On 10 Apr 1998, Nils Bandener wrote:
> > > BUTTON -> script which does a CALL "SCRIPTNAME" "ARGUMENT" -> YOUR SCRIPT
> > >
> > > So you have many small "call scripts" to call the needed one and all with
> > > a single difference in the ARGUMENT parameter of the CALL command.
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Giuseppe Chillemi
> >
> > Thanks for the advice, but those are the fashions I resent using. I do it
> > the "argument" way right now, but was wondering if there was a way to
> > determine the button since that would ease the process of adding buttons,
> > etc.
> >
> > Perhaps include some kind of IDs for buttons?
>
> Optional IDs for buttons would be no big problem. If an ID for a
> button would have been defined, it could be automatically sent as
> argument to the script.
Yeah, I would really like that!
> > And text?
>
> Do you think of text fields? I see no real use for IDs for such
> fields, as they cannot start any action at all.
Yes, text fields. In the sense that if one double clicks on a text field,
you can invoke scripts, etc. Kind of like hyper text.
Martin Sahln
Director, AAA Awards
V. President, Amiga Computer Group
You can download the complete archive as Fiasco database here.