| From: | TOM BAILIE |
| Date: | 24 Oct 2000 at 22:39:12 |
| Subject: | Re: AmigaOS 3.9 screenshot |
Hello Andy (?????) Hall,
> > Actually..they were much more cost competetive originally..since the
> > price/performance ratio was better in1997 (PPC) and(1994/5 (when I got my
> > first gfx card).....
>
> Some of us weren't around as an Amiga User in 1997 (I was upgrading from
> 3.1 to Win95 around then, and playing Tie Fighter all day. :-))
You spaketh such truths! I didn't get an Amiga until 'Feb. '99!
And OHHOOOooo! what a sorry day THAT was.
> > I still advocate that if you want a better/faster/more fun Amiga
> > experience that *you should stil upgrade* .... prices may seem `high` but
> > remember in real terms they`re cheap due to slow recovery of development
> > costs in such a small market.
>
> I agree for the most part, people should upgrade whenever they can, but
> remember it doesn't matter why they are expensive, they still are and some
> of as are mere students......
Or, like me, 60 or over - don't worry - I'm not in the 'over' bracket
just yet. But I'll never work again, and havn't done for over 3
years, so pennies count!
However, for one with an unelectronicalprogrammablecybernet ear, the
Amiga news seems (for now), most promising.
Unlike the rest of you, I don't live in hope - I just hope to continue
to live.
'luck to All,
Regards,
Tom.
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails