Newsgroups: alt.cult-movies,rec.arts.sf.movies,rec.arts.movies,news.answers,rec.answers,alt.answers
Path: bloom-beacon.mit.edu!hookup!swrinde!pipex!sunic!trane.uninett.no!eunet.no!nuug!EU.net!sun4nl!news.nic.surfnet.nl!tudelft.nl!news.twi.tudelft.nl!vos
From: Vos@Dutiws.TWI.TUDelft.NL
Subject: MOVIES: ALIEN FAQ part 4/4
Message-ID: <CyvG3D.EEs@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl>
Followup-To: rec.arts.sf.movies
Sender: vos@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl (E.W.C. de Vos)
Organization: Weyland Yutani - "Building Better Worlds"
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 1994 00:30:49 GMT
Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu
Expires: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 23:00:00 GMT
Lines: 823
Xref: bloom-beacon.mit.edu alt.cult-movies:47357 rec.arts.sf.movies:22419 rec.arts.movies:123555 news.answers:28834 rec.answers:8272 alt.answers:5502

Posting-Frequency: approx. every month
Archive-name: movies/alien-faq/part4
Version: 2.1

 
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
&                                                                            &
&                         ALIEN, ALIENS and ALIEN^3                          &
&                                                                            &
&                 Information and Frequently Asked Questions                 &
&                                                                            &
&                               Version 2.1                                  &
&                                                                            &
&                               PART 4 of 4                                  &
&                                                                            &
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&



16. SOME HEAVY DEDUCTIONS


The following is  a highly speculative theory regarding the evolutionary 
history of the alien creatures and their natural hosts, as well as the nature 
and conditions of the alien homeworld. These speculations are based on 
the following assumptions; that the alien evolved on a planet and was not 
created de novo by another species in its current form, that the alien and its 
homeworld have been shaped by physical and evolutionary forces which 
are similar to those in effect on our own world, that the alien is not the 
dominant life form on its homeworld, existing instead as part of a complex 
ecosystem, and that the homeworld is as diverse with life forms and 
potential habitats as is our own. The information used as a basis for this 
speculation comes solely from the Alien, Aliens and Alien^3 films.

Important common features of aliens taken from the 3 films:

	Host dependent reproduction
	Dual stage metamorphic life cycle
	Metallo-silicate exoskeleton
	Endoskeleton in juvenile form
	Growth-stage mediated shedding of skin
	Low pH blood
	Increased speed & strength (relative to human standards)
	Large curving crania of varying morphology
	Internal mouthed tongue
	Carnivorous external teeth
	Air sac bellows in the juvenile form
	Articulated limbs and tail in all life stages
	Varying number of limbs and digits in different life stages
	Predatory or greater intelligence
	Copious production of "slime'

Presumed common features observed in some subset of the films:

	Presumed sociality and communication 
			(i.e., the hive was not a fluke)
	Internal pressure greater than 14 psi
	Body temperature equals ambient temperature 
	Can "breathe" underwater
	Nest built in hot area

Some or all of these features may be due to the adaptation/modification of 
the organism to its current lifestyle as a space faring parasitic species. In 
the case of modification, it would be most parsimonious to assume that the 
aliens were intended for use as biological weapons. This theory assumes 
that the creatures found in space are adapted or modified to living in this 
habitat, and focuses on estimating their possible ancestral forms and the 
state of the ancestral homeworld. It assumes that any modifications and 
adaptations have been made using pre-existing characteristics, so that the 
ancestral creatures posses similar characteristics. The creatures found in 
space are referred to as "modern" in the following discussion.

To avoid confusion between discussions of various theorized species and 
their respective life cycles, the life stages have been given specific 
designations as follows:

Life cycle phases:					Life stage designation
[1]	Egg is lain							EGG
		*maturation phase*	[this period might occur in utero]
[2]	Egg matures 
		*dormant phase*	[length of this phase is indefinite]
	Host signals are detected	= motion + sounds
[3]	Egg hatches and mobile crawler follows signals to hostLARVA
[4]	Host's breathing orifice is secured by "face hugging" crawler
		*implantation phase*		~24 hours
	Embryo is implanted in host breathing system.	EMBRYO
		Crawler falls off, dead.
		*gestation phase*		~1-10 days
[5]	Chestbuster emerges from host			NYMPH
[6]	Chestbuster stage undergoes a series of instar-like	INSTAR
		transformations until the imago is achieved.	IMAGO
[7]	Queen-imago lays egg				QUEEN

The life stages encompassing the egg, larva and embryo are referred to as 
JUVENILE, and those encompassing the nymph, instars and imagoes are 
referred to as ADULT.

Discussion of observed characteristics:

	The alien life cycle is divided into two distinct stages which are 
reminiscent of the alternating sporophyte and gametophyte generational 
stages of plants and fungi. Plants produce distinct types of reproductive 
cells (spores or gametes) which give rise to genetically distinct types of 
organisms. Spores grow into gametophytes, which produce gametes, while 
gametes fuse to form sporophytes which produce spores. In the alien 
species, the sporophyte stage could be represented by the juvenile stages. 
These would create the "spore" or embryo. The gametophyte stage could 
be represented by the adult stages. These would lay eggs after gamete 
fusion. Such a strategy in might be indicative of an chaotic and dangerous 
natural environment (see discussion of hypothetical ancestors). We have 
zero knowledge of the genetics of these creatures, so further speculation 
on the existence or nature of alien reproductive cells is futile.

	The alien morphology seems to be a melange of arthropod and 
vertebrate characteristics. The segmented exoskeletal carapace and 
variable numbers of limbs are reminiscent of terrestrial arthropods (as well 
as armored fishes and reptiles to a lesser extent), while the adult body plan 
seems more vertebrate in nature; the presence of a jaw, spine terminating 
in a tail and limbs ending in grasping hands and feet as opposed to the 
mouthparts, legs and body plan of an arthropod suggest a vertebrate 
morphology. The larval legs are articulated via an endoskeleton, which 
appears to be covered in a sheath of muscle and a pliable external layer of 
protein and silicon. This seems to indicate that the oldest ancestors of 
these creatures posessed endoskeletons, and that exoskeletons evolved 
later. As is the case with vertebrate evolution in the Silurian and Devonian 
periods, the endoskeleton may have evolved first as a means to protect the 
CNS, and the exoskeleton could have evolved secondarily; in response to 
environmental challenges.

The eggs are complex organisms in and of themselves. They are 
responsible for maintaining life support for the larva for an indefinite 
amount of time, and must recognize a potential host and distinguish it 
from valid members of the nest. The eggs contain rudimentary moving 
parts. Once the egg has determined that a host is proximal, it releases the 
larva. In the modern species, the egg is flammable, translucent and 
unarmored. Their gracile nature in comparison to the adults may be in 
response to the security afforded by the nest strategy. Because of these 
unusual qualities in an egg, it might be that the egg and larva constitute a 
single organism up until the point where the larva is released. The size of 
an egg in comparison to the size of the contained larva indicates 
substantial internal morphology, consistent with requirements for life 
support and sensory systems.

Despite the obvious immediate differences, the organism's basic body plan 
may be conserved between the juvenile and adult forms. The larval form 
has 8 legs, and while imago forms only appear to have 4 limbs, queens 
appear to have 8. All forms have a single articulated tail, implying the 
presence of a spine and CNS. As the juveniles posses an endoskeleton it 
could be assumed that the adults do as well. The adult head morphology is 
quite distinctive. In the post-nymph forms, the mouth contains a secondary 
set of jaws on the end of the tongue, and the head is long and curved. In 
the modern species, it is probable that the larval form is derived to the 
point where a majority of the sensory portions of the larval body remain in 
the egg when the larva is released. Anatomy corresponding to the adult 
head may be contained within the egg. Accordingly, if the juvenile "air-
sacs" are used for respiration, any adult breathing apparatus would be 
located posterior to the hindmost pair of adult legs. Four "vanes" are 
visible on the backs of most adults, and six are visible along the backs of 
queens. These may function in breathing. Additionally, the head 
configuration of the adult may be adaptive in that it would prevent 
accidental implantation of an embryo into an adult by a larva, or prevent 
intentional implantation by a larva of another species. The legs of the larva 
will not easily grasp the adult head, and the ventral "embryopositor" tube 
will be subject to attack by the mouthed tongue. This may suggest that 
there are competing species of these creatures on the homeworld.

While in the egg, the larva sloshes about in a fluid, suggesting aquatic 
origins for this species. The emerging larva retains a thin coating of the 
internal fluid, and this layer appears to be caustic, although the caustic 
properties are not as dramatic as those displayed by the organism's blood. 
The combination of the egg fluid and blood pH indicates drastically 
different aquatic environment on the homeworld than on earth. It is 
possible that the pH of the egg fluid is closer to the true pH of the oceans 
on the homeworld and that the caustic properties of the organism's blood 
are due to a combination of modification and adaptation to the parasitic 
lifestyle, or the egg maturation process may deplete the egg fluid of its 
caustic properties. 

Interior carapace pressure might indicate a higher average planetary 
pressure than 14 psi. This could be a defense mechanism, or it could 
simply be circulatory pressure. The internal physiology of the organism 
has yet to be revealed, but pulsing "artery-like" structures have been 
observed in emergent nymphs. Possibly the homeworld is larger or the 
atmosphere is heavier than on earth. The larval air sacs/bellows might be a 
historical adaptation to living beyond the aqueous environment, but it is 
possible that these are a parasitic adaptation, and are not required by the 
organism. The degree to which they function is probably dictated by the 
atmospheric requirements of the host, but we have no knowledge of the 
organism's atmospheric requirements. If such sacs are required, the larva 
will not survive in vacuum. The adults appear to function as well 
underwater as out of it, implying that the do not use air sacs. It is possible 
that inert gasses irritate the adults. Possibly, they breathe using modified 
gill structures located in the dorsal vanes.

Body temperature is ambient, perhaps indicating a generally warm 
planetary surface temperature, or geothermal habitat requirement. It 
remains to be seen how long the imago can survive in a vacuum or sub-
freezing temperatures. The low pH of the blood would seem to indicate a 
drastically reduced freezing point. Queens  survive extended periods of 
transit through both of these environments, and it is possible that other 
instar and imago forms may as well. The various adult forms demonstrate 
aversion to open flames, but unlike the eggs and nymphs, are not 
flammable. This suggests temperature boundaries within the upper limits 
of terrestrial environments.

The lack of obvious eyes in any observed stages indicates that the aliens 
either live entirely in enclosed or subterranean areas, or that there is no 
visible light incident on the surface of the homeworld. If the organisms 
lived entirely underground, their size and potential for well populated 
nests implies  a well developed and robust subterranean ecosystem. If they 
lived the entirety of their lives in their nests, they would be dependent 
upon the movement of prey and hosts into the nest for survival. It is 
possible that they lure these into the nest, but the aliens seem quite capable 
and adept at retrieving them as well. If they dwelled on an illuminated 
surface for any amount of time, eyes would be a distinct advantage. 

The aliens display significant ability to cling to and move on vertical and 
inverted surfaces, supporting the idea that a significant portion of time is 
spent underground or in enclosed spaces. Nests fit this description, and it 
may be that castes which venture outside of the nest posses eyes. In this 
case, these castes have not yet been observed. The nests might be 
constructed above or below ground or water, but seem to be designed so 
that the resinous construction material covers all surfaces near their cores. 
Partially submerged nests would require air chambers for hosts and larvae.

Copious amounts of a viscous substance are constantly being secreted 
from the mouthparts and neighboring regions. This substance appears to 
be used in constructing nests, hardening to form a resin. Thick strands may 
also be produced, although the mechanism for this is unclear. Prior to 
hardening, the resin does not display caustic properties, and may act to 
neutralize acids. This would be useful, both in offering protection from an 
acidic environment, and in protecting the nest from being accidentally 
dissolved.

Homeworld speculation: 
(assuming that the aliens are not entirely subterranean)

The homeworld has a higher atmospheric pressure and possibly a greater 
gravity than terrestrial standards. It has oceans which are of a very low pH 
and most likely an atmosphere of similar low pH. The EM spectrum 
incident upon the homeworld is significantly different from terrestrial 
standards, lacking "visible" wavelengths. This might  indicate that the 
planet's orbit is very large, that it is extremely overcast or that it orbits a 
weak sun. In this case, the ecosystem might be based on geochemical and 
geothermal systems. Geothermal activity might also provide a relatively 
high ambient temperature. The acidic nature of the aquatic and 
atmospheric environments might also be due to extensive production of 
hydrogen sulfide and other "high energy" compounds via geochemical 
activity. A high level of volcanic and tectonic activity might be maintained 
by tidal forces stemming from planetary and stellar bodies in the system.
	An ecosystem not based on photosynthesis would require radically 
different energy production schemes. Such an ecosystem might be 
founded on thermo- and acidophillic microorganisms. Larger autotrophs 
might incorporate endosymbiotic versions of these microorganisms. 
Vegetative "plants" would be found around areas of geothermal and 
geochemical activity, both on the surface and on the floor of the oceans. 
Other organisms might exploit the difference in pH and temperature at the 
boundary between aquatic and terrestrial environments. If volcanic activity 
were responsible for the overcast nature of the atmosphere, incident light 
might be used by photosynthetic organisms high in the atmosphere. 
Thermophillic photosynthesizing organisms might also be found near lava 
flows. Areas free of volcanic activity would be dead zones, possibly 
inhabited by hibernating organisms awaiting an increase in ocean level or 
the occasional lost creature.
	Extensive tectonic and volcanic activity might result in habitats 
subject to frequent change. A geothermal habitat might be replaced by a 
geochemical or volcanic habitat, or might be flooded. If this were the case, 
organisms would have to be either extremely adaptive or mobile in order 
to survive.

Hypothetical ancestors:

	The presence of an endoskeleton and an exoskeleton implies that 
conditions changed during the evolution of the organism, requiring 
armored protection of the entire body. Drastically increased predation is 
one such possible change, while a dramatic lowering of the pH of the 
environment is a second. These options are not mutually exclusive; hostile 
changes in the environment may cause increases in levels of predation. 
	A low pH ocean could literally dissolve its inhabitants, forcing 
them to lower their pH to meet that of the environment, present a barrier 
against the caustic properties of their surroundings, leave the oceans or try 
these strategies in various combinations. Thick layers of continuously 
renewed armor would be constantly ablated by the acid, but could protect 
underlying tissues, and secretion of neutralizing substances could serve as 
similar a shield. A lowering of the blood pH might offer some protection, 
but might also begin to damage one's own tissues, and would probably be 
energetically expensive. Raising the pH of one's tissues would not be a 
successful strategy in an aquatic environment. 
	The aliens posses all of these characteristics to various degrees, 
suggesting that the aquatic environment is either extremely caustic, or 
became progressively more caustic in discrete degrees. The modern 
species appears only to produce secretions in and around the mouth 
region; possibly the protective substance has to be applied to exposed 
regions of the anatomy, or whole body coverage is not necessary beyond 
an aquatic environment. In the former case, hardening of the resin might 
serve to bolster the exoskeleton, or the exoskeleton might be formed of the 
same substance, secreted from the surface of the body. The endo- and 
exoskeletons would be made from different substances in this case. In 
either case, the secretions around the mouth are used for building the nest. 
Ancestral types might have been covered in an additional layer of 
secretions.
	The larvae are known to have an external layer composed of some 
combination of protein-polysaccharides and polarized silicon. Larvae do 
not seem to produce secretions, and the external layer is not as hard in 
appearance as the adult carapace. In non-nymph adults, this carapace has a 
metallic appearance, and is probably composed of additional materials. 
The teeth of nymphs often have a metallic appearance. If the hardening of 
resinous secretions were the source of the exoskeleton, these secretions 
might contain different substances depending on their intended use. 
Secretions destined to become armor, structural material or strands and 
cables might have very different compositions.
	Living in a variety of challenging and dangerous environments 
might favor the observed division of reproductive strategies. The organism 
might be able to adapt rapidly to changing environments by using varying 
morphologies and reproductive strategies as a means of "shifting gears". 
An organism that was unconcerned with finding a mate could focus on 
finding a carrier or host capable of moving its offspring to a potentially 
more hospitable area. Organisms in a hospitable area could focus on 
reproducing themselves as efficiently as possible. Primitive juveniles 
could create embryos to be carried away by mobile hosts, while successful 
adults could create multiple eggs which were suited to their environment. 
Thus selection operates one way on the juveniles, selecting for those able 
to find suitable hosts (including mobility when the environment is 
shifting), and another way on the adults, selecting for those best suited to 
their environment. This implies that primitive juvenile stages were capable 
of predicting environmental shifts and altering their host selection 
accordingly. That the modern species has an "atrophied" juvenile stage 
implies that a stable environment was located, or that a novel strategy for 
relocating was developed. The stable environment may have been space, 
or perhaps there are yet unobserved castes capable of carrying eggs long 
distances.

	The ancestral organism's life cycle might have been similar to that 
of a caterpillar/butterfly. The organism searches for a host off of which an 
embryo may feed after being lain by a larva, much like a caterpillar on a 
leaf. Possibly older pre-parasitic forms of this organism were like 
caterpillars; the implanted "embryos" may have been mobile, representing 
an intermediate life-stage (PRO-EMBRYO). It is possible that the nymph 
stage may have occupied this position, having been "laid" by the larva in a 
more advanced form. It certainly seems to be the case that the juvenile and 
nymph stages of the modern species are developmentally simplified. The 
modern larva is not capable of ingesting nutrients, being solely devoted to 
implanting one embryo, and some modern nymphs emerge sans limbs or 
with "limbs buds".

This primitive life cycle might have proceeded as follows:

[1] Egg is lain - matures - hatches
[2] Larva proceeds in search of food and an appropriately mobile host.
[3] Larva finds a host, lays pro-embryo on the host and returns to stage 2.
[4] Pro-embryo "grazes" on host organism or organisms 
[5] Pro-embryo develops into first instar, becoming independent of host.
[6] Instars develop into imago forms.
[7] Imago searches for food and mates, lays eggs.

This life cycle is only "mildly" parasitic; the pro-embryo does not 
necessarily harm the host during its grazing/feeding activity, but remains 
in jeopardy of discovery and extermination in this vulnerable state. If the 
pro-embryo were implanted internally to the host and absorbed nutrients 
directly from the host, it could be less vulnerable. The first parasitic 
ancestors may have placed their pro-embryos internal to the host, where 
nutrients could be obtained partially digested food in the host's "stomach" 
or digestive system. If the host digestive system bore similarity to 
vertebrate systems, there may have been compartments of extreme pH, 
which may have contributed to the acidophilic nature of the modern 
species. More advanced parasites might have done away with their pro-
embryo forms, simply implanting embryos within their hosts and which 
would grow to nymph form by stealing nutrients directly from the host. 
These parasites would not have been social organisms.

hypothetical ancestors and habitats:
	unarmored aquatic vertebrate in a mildly acidic ocean
	slime-resin coated aquatic vertebrate in an acidic ocean
	resin-armored and slime coated aquatic creature in a 
		very acidic ocean
	armored terrestrial creature coping with a variety of hostile surface 
		environments
		above described creature with a grazing pro-embryo form
		above described creature with a parasitic embryo form

The development of sociality:

In descending order, the "weak" points in the life cycle of the pre-social 
organisms appear to be the dormant phase, the gestation phase and the 
travel time of the larva from egg to host. These risks could be minimized 
by securing the eggs "underground" (away from host/egg predation), and 
by immobilizing hosts near to the eggs. The eggs might remain susceptible 
to predation by small egg eating creatures or larger creatures capable of 
entering an active nest, requiring cooperative measures on the part of 
adults in protecting them. Sociality might develop naturally from such a 
system. Initially, a division of labor between hunter-foragers to locate and 
retrieve fresh hosts and warrior-scavenger-nurses to protect the eggs and 
gestating hosts from predators might suffice. The subsequent evolution of 
the queen dominated caste system may have been a way to diminish 
competition for hosts between partially related organisms, by establishing 
genetically homogenous nests. The large numbers of eggs produced by 
modern queens seem to indicate a strategy involving overproduction of 
eggs. The persistence of this strategy in the modern species might be due 
to co-evolution of egg predators, or to environmental conditions where the 
risk of destruction of significant portions of the nest was high.

Host Mediated Adaptation:

	A further means to adapt to an environment is by adopting 
strategies developed earlier by another species. The embryo is in a prime 
position to learn about the metabolic and environmental conditions of its 
host. Knowledge of local environmental conditions such as the pH, 
atmospheric content and energy generation schemes would be important 
for post emergence survival. Varying energy generation schemes may 
result in differing metabolisms. Knowledge of the metabolic level and 
requirements of the host gives an advantage to be used in hunting such 
hosts. The development of the nymph might mimic other physical 
attributes of the host as well. For example, if the host spent much time 
hanging upside down, the nymph could develop that way as well, making 
it a competent predator in an "upside down" environment. 
	Adult organisms are presumably adapted to their environment via 
some combination of this host mediated process in concert with post-
emergence selection. In the primitive species, larval offspring of these 
adapted adults will have to evaluate the state of the environment to 
determine if they should seek a mobile host to find a more hospitable 
environment, or  if the should seek one to which they are adapted. 
	If a larva chooses a mobile host, its embryo may posses different 
metabolic requirements or a generally different metabolism, which may 
result in the death of the embryo after prolonged exposure. The nymph 
must remain capable of aborting its development at the minimum possible 
stage and emerging from the host, developing a new adaptive strategy 
from the information gathered from the host, and surviving to reproduce 
and lay eggs adapted to the new environment. This minimum stage is 
limbless, displaying only the buds of limbs, and uses the segmented tail 
for propulsion.
	If the larva chooses a host to which it is adapted, there will be 
much less danger to the embryo from the host's metabolism, and the 
nymph will be able to develop to its full form prior to emergence. This full 
form possesses two sets of limbs in addition to the tail. It is possible that a 
host chosen by a larva that detects no impending environmental shift 
might be immobile or vegetative in nature.
	Once a relatively stable environment has been located (in which 
several rounds of reproduction were possible), a varying progression of 
forms might be observed, as pressures of selection and host mediated 
adaptation refine the organism's strategy for survival in the environment.




Sensation:
	Since the creatures do not posses any eyes by terrestrial standards, 
they must have some other means of sensing their environment. If the 
body plan is conserved between juvenile and adult stages, it is reasonable 
to assume that the same types of sensors are used in each case. The eggs 
appear to be able to detect motion and proximity, and to be able to 
distinguish between hosts and nestmates. The sensation of heat may not be 
important to this process, as the natural host may have had similar body 
temperature. The larvae are capable locating and determining the distance 
to the host implantation orifice, and of leaping through space to that 
orifice. The adults are capable of distinguishing between nestmates  and 
potential hosts, and are capable of detecting movement. They are probably 
also possessed of pattern recognition systems, and spatial arrangement 
recognition systems. Adults have been observed to fixate on objects using 
their heads, suggesting that their primary sensory organs are located in the 
anterior portions of their heads.
	All adult stages are capable of producing a variety of sounds, and it 
is probably the case that they can hear and communicate via sound. 
Communication with "stripped down" eggs is probably better facilitated 
via chemical means than sound. It is likely that recognition of nestmates is 
achieved via a combination of chemical and sonic communication. Eggs 
might communicate with each other via chemical signals. The detection of 
motion and proximity may be facilitated via sonic systems. In terrestrial 
nocturnal, subterranean and aquatic environments, these have proven quite 
successful, and accordingly, the shape of the head is reminiscent of 
cetacean crania. However, the large curving structure of the head might 
serve as some other sort of sensor as well. It could be used to detect EM 
wavelengths other than visible light, although it is not obvious how useful 
such a structure would be in detecting longer or shorter wavelengths. 
Interestingly, the creatures might have a sensory system similar to the 
"motion tracking" technology developed by humans.




Communication:
	Variation in the surface morphology of the head seems to indicate 
a sensory function. Lone adults have uniform smooth reflective heads, 
while adults functioning in a nest have distinct anterior and posterior head 
sections; the posterior region being covered in a ribbed pattern with a 
sagittal crest, and the anterior region being characteristically smooth with 
a pair of pits on either side of the head. This morphology in social 
organisms may be used in sonic and chemical communication. That this 
ribbed pattern is visible in the neck regions of the lone adult may indicate 
that the smooth reflective surface of the heads serves as a canopy covering 
more complex structures.
	This smooth canopy is reminiscent of the smooth surfaces of the 
queen's headpiece sheath. This sheath is comprised of at least three 
independent pieces, the largest of which possesses several overlapping 
flanges. Various sized holes are visible between these flanges, and the 
entire sheath may serve as a production organ for chemical signals. In the 
transformation from imago to queen-imago (see the discussion of ancestral 
types below), the adult canopy may develop into the sheath. Once this 
transformation has been accomplished, the new queen would issue 
chemical signals destroying the canopies of any nearby adults.
	If the ribbed structures beneath the canopy corresponded to modest 
versions of the signal procution organs beneath the queen's sheath and 
were be used for communication between nestmates, the canopy might 
serve to isolate a lone adult from foreign signals. Canopied adults would in 
effect be "deaf" to most nest signals. If all nestmates are progeny of the 
same queen, then the canopy destroying signal produced by a particular 
queen might be genetically specified. A canopied adult which found itself 
near a foreign nest or a foreign queen would not be susceptible to that 
queen's signals, and would develop into a queen. An adult which found 
itself near a related nest or queen would lose its canopy and join the nest. 
A dead queen would be replaced by a young canopied adult. It could be 
assumed that an uncanopied adult would be utterly subservient to the 
commands of a queen, in which case it might be possible for one queen to 
kill another and steal the uncanopied members of the nest. The canopy 
must allow limited communication, as a valid queen must be able to order 
its destruction. Possibly, canopied adults would be capable of identifying 
hosts harboring embryos as well, and could act to protect related embryos 
and possibly destroy unrelated ones.




The modern and ancestral natural hosts:

	The modern species" reproductive cycle is problematic because it 
displays a dependence upon the death of a host for the reproduction of a 
each organism. A host which survived nymph emergence might favor the 
development of this lifestyle. Such a host would have to withstand the 
damage incurred in emergence, and be able to survive further rounds of 
implantation, gestation and emergence. Alternatively, ancestral forms of 
the organism might have used a less injurious host-emergence strategy. If 
instead of creating new exits, the nymphs emerged via the orifice through 
which they were implanted, the chance of the host surviving would 
increase dramatically. Possibly, ancestral organisms used such a strategy. 
Also, a host with thick exterior armor would make creation of new exits 
difficult. In any case, a large organism would be better suited to surviving 
the embryo development process. The parasite might be little more than a 
pest for a host of sufficient size, and might even serve some symbiotic 
function by feeding on exoskeletal parasites of the host after emergence.

The implantation period indicates a requirement for about 24 hours of 
close contact. This is facilitated by the articulated limbs and the tail. In 
modern creatures, the larval "embryopositor" appears to be composed of 
soft tissue, indicating that implantation is probably directly onto the 
desired internal substrate as opposed to being gained by destruction of 
external tissue. In addition to other possible functions, the mouthed tongue 
of the imago might function to permit sampling of the tissue contained 
within a hard carapace. These data suggest that the natural host possessed 
a hard shell.

During the implantation phase, the host is provided with atmosphere via 
specialized bellows structures on the larva, implying that the host would 
be in danger of asphyxiation during the implantation process. Thus the 
natural host probably has only one breathing orifice, and is at least 
partially terrestrial. The parameters of the area surrounding the natural 
host's breathing orifice may be estimated via observing the length of tail 
available and the available span of the articulated limbs (2-3 feet for the 
limbs and 4-5 feet of tail). This orifice is most likely at the end of a stalk 
of indeterminate length, which might be up to a foot in diameter. The 
terminus of this stalk is most likely a spheroid 1-2 feet in diameter. 
	The amount of oxygen provided to the host is limited by the size of 
the larval bellows apparatus, and this would limit the size of a potential 
host and that host's activity during implantation. Possibly the bellows size 
has evolved to parallel changes in host size. The constrictive nature of the 
tail would seem to suggest that the host's breathing is accomplished by 
changing the volume of the stalk. Bi-directional air flow in the host might 
be accomplished via the use of peristaltic waves. Since the host is likely 
armored, the tail would probably not be capable of constricting the host 
unless this strategy were used to inhale and exhale.

Assuming that the host would resent an attack on its sole breathing orifice 
and the subsequent implantation event, temporary incapacitation of the 
host would be desirable on the part of the organism. An extremely large 
host might be able to detach the larva at negligible expense to its own 
structure. Possibly the constrictive nature of the tail is used to immobilize 
the host initially. However, an incapacitated host would be easy prey to 
various other predatory creatures. It is possible that the implantation 
period would not be *extremely* uncomfortable for the host, and that the 
host would be capable of enduring the implantation period without 
sufficient cause to successfully dislodge the parasite. In this case, the 
implantation process might only diminish the host's "natural breathing 
capacity', requiring the supplemental air supply provided by the larva. In 
such a scenario, it might be possible for multiple larvae to simultaneously 
implant embryos in hosts.

Emergence of the nymph seems to be triggered by moderate levels of host 
activity. This might be a valid strategy if the host was preyed upon. 
Moderate levels of activity would indicate that there were no predators 
around and that the locale was safe for nymph emergence. Sufficiently 
high level of activity might indicate flight from a predator, and a period of 
inactivity might be indicative of a host's attempt to hide from a predator.

The general conclusions regarding the natural host are as follows; it is a 
large terrestrial or semi-aquatic organism which breathes through an 
orifice at the end of a stalk. This could be the host's head, or it could be a 
specialized structure. The host is most likely armored and is possibly prey 
to other predators.

Most of the above speculation regards the natural host of the pre-social 
organism. The natural host of the social organism is most likely a smaller 
version of the described host. Smaller hosts would occur in more abundant 
numbers, and their populations might tolerate the parasitic lifestyle of 
increasing numbers of aliens. In addition, it is more efficient to capture, 
immobilize and maintain smaller hosts than large. It is possible that the 
modern organism's penchant for creating a new emergence orifice is a 
modification subsequent to the dispersal into space; on the homeworld, the 
social organisms might remain capable of multiple rounds of implantation, 
gestation and emergence on a single host. Some species might retain the 
ability to switch from a social mode to a more primitive non-social mode.

Proposed ancestral types: Presumably, organisms which use these 
strategies still live on the homeworld.

Early ancestor: a non-social creature with a multi-stage life cycle. Most 
stages of this life cycle are omnivorous. This is a very primitive version of 
the organism.
Natural host: The natural host might be any large mobile creature, or it 
might be some sort of immobile vegetative organism.
Life cycle: Eggs are laid in large clutches, perhaps buried in the ground or 
perhaps attached to vegetative organisms via resin. This resin might also 
serve to protect the eggs from predation. After a long maturation phase, 
these eggs hatch and larvae emerge. These are free living organisms in 
their own right, devoted to finding food and potential hosts. Possessed of 
advanced sensory capabilities, these creatures are capable of producing 
many pro-embryos. The eggs of this species would be little more than 
containers, possessing no sensory apparatus and probably opening upon 
the signal of the larva. These larvae locate and lay pro-embryos on 
putative hosts. These pro-embryos digest whatever available food there is 
to be found on their substrate; the food might be other surface parasites or 
vegetative matter or secreted substances. These pro-embryos would be 
capable of moving between hosts, and some in some "vegetative" species 
might serve in a "cross-pollinating" capacity. In more advanced forms, the 
pro-embryos might live in the host digestive system, feeding off of 
partially digested nutrients. Once a sufficient level of nutrition has been 
achieved, the embryo metamorphoses into a nymph and becomes a free 
living organism. Progression through of a series of predatory instars yields 
the imago, which serves the sole purpose of laying more eggs. 
Comments: There are a variety of lifecycle and lifestyle strategies which 
may be derived from this organism. There are probably a variety of 
different species descended from this general form. The imago is the fully 
adult form of the organism, having spent all of its instars searching for 
food. As with the pro-embryo, this food might be both vegetative or 
"animal" in nature. 

Medial ancestor: a non-social predatory creature with a dual stage life 
cycle. This type of creature is perhaps on the verge of developing into the 
modern organism.
Natural host: The natural host is a large creature that breathes atmosphere 
through a single orifice on the end of an armored stalk. Airflow through 
this stalk is maintained by expanding and contracting the walls of the 
stalk, possibly via peristaltic waves. 
Life cycle: Thick-hided and perhaps armored eggs are buried in the ground 
and are mortared in place with resin. The eggs mature and enter the 
dormant phase. The motion and sound of a passing potential host signals 
the egg to hatch and disgorge the larva which pursues, catches and 
"boards" the host. In this organism, the larva's sole purpose is to locate and 
implant an embryo into a host as quickly as is possible. Its sensory 
apparatus are devoted to this task alone, and because it does not take 
nutrition, it can only afford to implant a few embryos; in most cases it can 
only manage one. The egg retains a modest ability for detection and 
controls the release of the larva. The larva then locates the breathing 
orifice, affixes itself to it via means of the legs and tail and supplements 
the air flow to the host during the implantation phase. The embryo is 
implanted in the internal substance of the breathing canal. Once 
implantation is complete, the larva dies. The host proceeds, until the 
nymph emerges from its "breathing trunk" via the natural orifice. The host 
most likely survives this ordeal, although it might experience labored 
breathing for a few days. The nymph goes through a series of instars , 
which hunt for food, until an imago is realized, which hunts for food, 
mates and prospective host ranges. The mouthed tongue might be integral 
to all three pursuits, as well as protecting the adults form implantation by 
larvae of other species. Putative hosts might be weakened by use of the 
mouthed tongue, making them more susceptible to being boarded by the 
larva. A series of eggs might be lain over a large area, awaiting a 
weakened host to stumble through. Possibly, the adults are capable of 
cucooning themselves and or severely weakened hosts with resin in order 
to protect against predation.
Comments: The eggs and larvae of this species appear intermediate in that 
they share the responsibilities of host detection and selection. This 
suggests that the larva and egg are a single continuous organism in this 
species and that sensory organs are shared or duplicated between the two 
parts.

Immediate ancestor: a predatory social creature, possibly smaller than the 
medial ancestral type. This is the organism which immediately predated 
the modern organism.
Natural host: a smaller version of the ancestor's host, or a similar smaller 
creature.
Life cycle: A fertile queen lays thick hided eggs in a protected creche. 
These are guarded and tended by various castes of adult relatives. The nest 
is created and maintained by the adults and is constructed from secreted 
resin. The adults procure hosts from outside the nest and immobilize them 
near mature eggs. The eggs open and the larva immediately attach to the 
host. Larval energy usage is almost totally devoted to adhering to the host 
and implanting a single embryo. The large eggs contain most of the 
important sensory and decision making apparatus, leaving the larvae as 
"stripped down" as is possible. Implantation and gestation occur as in the 
medial ancestor, but the nymph tears its way out of the host body. Unless 
it is sufficiently large, the host likely expires in the emergence. The nymph 
develops into an imago via a series of instars, which might perform 
particular duties required by the nest according to their age or caste.
Comments: Queens display at least six limbs, and an additional pair of 
hind limbs are required to support the ovarian organ systems. Queens have 
a greater number of limbs, digits and dorsal vanes than are observed in 
various adult forms, and thus may represent a most advanced instar form. 
If this is the case, the various observed forms may represent different 
instar stages of adult development, and each of these might correspond to 
a different caste. A nymph which found it self isolated from a nest, or in a 
nest sans a functional queen, might develop rapidly through a series of 
instars (which would only be of use in a functional nest) and into a queen-
imago which could then begin the egg laying process and re-establish 
control of a leaderless nest. A queen in a functioning nest would suppress 
this development in all other individuals, halting their development at the 
penultimate imago stage. This could be accomplished via a special queen-
produced chemical signal which causes the destruction of adult canopies. 
A lone imago metamorphosing into a queen-imago might require a period 
of hibernation as it develops the morphological characteristics of a queen: 
the auxiliary ventral arms, large headpiece sheath and externalized ovarian 
systems with associated legs. In this case, the adult canopy might be the 
source of the developmental signals which trigger the transformation, and 
would develop into the sheath.
	The queen-imago is a form devoted to producing large numbers of 
eggs in a short amount of time. Presumably, this form is a novel 
development which is specific to the social species. It might be that imago 
form retains the ability to lay eggs at a much lower rate and at much 
greater expense to itself. This would require an override of the natural 
inclination for canopied imago forms to develop into queen-imagoes, and 
would probably only occur under periods of extreme stress when the 
nutritional requirements of metamorphosis into a queen could not be met.

Problems:

The most difficult problem regards the provenance of the "acidic blood'. It 
is likely that the caustic properties of the blood are not due to simple pH, 
but that other chemical and enzymatic factors are in effect. Regardless, the 
origin of such a system remains difficult to estimate. The egg fluid would 
seem to indicate a moderately acidic aquatic environment. An acidification 
of the blood might have arisen as a defense mechanism, or in response to 
changes in the environment, or as an adaptation to a life cycle stage in an 
acidic digestive environment. The organism's "blood" might be its 
digestive system, which would suggest an extremely different internal 
structure than terrestrial standards. The caustic properties of the blood 
appear to be more effective on synthetic and organic materials than on 
metals, supporting the idea that other chemical and enzymatic factors are 
at work, which in turn supports the digestive theory.

Disclaimer:
The characteristics discussed above are not the sole characteristics 
available for discussion, nor are the conclusions drawn the only 
conclusions possible. This is simply one possible picture based on the set 
of assumptions and the data.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

15. REVISION HISTORY

(Daryll Hobson initiated this FAQ)

v1.0 - March 22, 1993 - Initial draft.  Most information supplied by me alone.

v1.1 - March 31, 1993 - Added countless bits of information supplied by
       interested users of the net.

v1.2 - April 14, 1993 - Revision control.  Chestburster scene added, more info
       on the dog/cow scene of _ALIEN^3_, more _ALIENS_ cut scenes, added to
       the alien physiology discussion.  Small changes to the merchandise
       list.  Added more "memorable quotes" and more "trivia".  Added
       "rituals" section and switched around the order of the sections to
       make the FAQ more readable.

v1.3 - May 5, 1993 - Small changes to the "Who is?" section.  Removed the
       Chestburster scene.  Organized the discussion section.  Added some
       more frequently asked questions.  More complete descriptions of the 
       cut scenes from _ALIEN_ and _ALIENS_ were added as well.  More trivia.

v1.4 - June 23, 1993 - Added Gibson's ALIEN^3 script synopsis, James Cameron's
       answers to a few questions about ALIENS and vastly improved the 
       merchandise and FAQ sections.

v1.5 - Sept 14, 1993 - Added more frequently asked questions.  Added running
       times to some of the _ALIEN_ cut scenes.  More rituals.  Added 
       extensive info about _ALIEN^3_ script rewrites.

v1.6 - Sept 21, 1993 - In an effort to reduce (eliminate?) the all-too-common
       flaming of _ALIEN^3_, I added a section to Frequently Discussed 
       Topics that addresses both sides of the argument.  Broke the FAQ up
       into 3 parts so I could (once again) post it to the Internet.

v1.7 - Dec 25, 1993 - FINALLY got an FTP site for the FAQ.  Added to the 
       technical errors, frequently asked questions, trivia.  Increased 
       emphasis on NOT asking me "Where can I get Gibson's ALIEN 3 script?"

v1.8 - Mar 8, 1994 - More information on soundtracks.  Added to frequently
       asked questions, trivia and memorable quotes.  Memorable quotes  
       ordered according to when they occur in the movies.  Didn't get
       around to adding ALL that new merchandise yet.  What a nightmare!

v1.9 - April 10,1994 - Changed information on how to get Gibson's ALIEN 3
       script.  Added to frequently asked questions, merchandise and 
       memorable quotes.

v2.0 - June 14, 1994 - Added more memorable quotes, questions and
       merchandise.  Prepared the document to be HANDED OFF (ie: no longer
       maintained by me).

(Eelko de Vos took over the maintenace of the FAQ)

v2.1 - August 12, 1994 - Added some more info on various subjects. Also added
       part four to the faq: Steve's document about what he derived from the
       alien movies. It are the insights of a molecular biologist. I
       rearranged some bits, but most this document is mostly in its original
       state.
       I made the Alien WWW pages grow considerably. They are at:
         http://www.twi.tudelft.nl/~vos/alien.html

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
&                                                                            &
&                                 The END                                    &
&                                                                            &
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&



