STATISTICAL PROGRAMS OF THE
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
FY 1996


Table of Contents

Introduction

Chapter 1. Budgets for Statistical Programs

Overview of Statistical Program Budgets
Highlights of Congressional Action on the President's FY 1995 Budget Request
FY 1996 Budget Highlights
Reimbursable Programs
Purchases of Statistical Services

Chapter 2. Programs and Program Changes

Health and Safety Statistics
Social and Demographic Statistics
Statistics on Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment
Economic Statistics

Chapter 3. Long-Range Plans

Updates on Previously Reported Activities
New Activities

Glossary of Agency Abbreviations

Appendix


INTRODUCTION

Statistical Programs of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 1996 outlines the funding proposed for Federal statistical activities in the President's budget. The budget requested an estimated $2.8 billion for statistical work to be carried out in FY 1996.

The information in this report covers almost 70 Federal agencies that have annual budgets of $500,000 or more for statistical activities. This information was obtained from materials supplied to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) during the budget process, with the agencies providing additional details about their expenditures for reimbursable work and purchases of statistical services.

The report fulfills a responsibility of OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Section 3504(e)(2) of Title 44, United States Code) to prepare an annual report on statistical program funding.

Inquiries may be directed to the Chief Statistician, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D. C. 20503.


CHAPTER 1: Budgets for Statistical Programs

This chapter provides information about agency budgets for major statistical programs for FY 1994, FY 1995, and FY 1996. The impact on statistical activities of Congressional action on the President's FY 1995 budget request also is highlighted. The chapter includes as well information about statistical work performed by agencies on a reimbursable basis and about agency purchases of statistical services and products. The budget information for FY 1996 is from the President's budget as submitted to the Congress and thus does not reflect Congressional action.

Overview of Statistical Program Budgets

The following should be kept in mind when reviewing the information in this report:

Table 1: Direct Funding for Major Statistical Programs,
FY 1994 - FY 1996

(In millions of dollars)

Department Agency 1994
Actual
1995
Estimate
1996
Estimate
Agriculture ARS
ERS
FAS
FCS
FS
NASS
NRCS
4.5
55.1
26.3
19.0
10.1
81.7
88.3
4.3
53.5
28.5
18.8
10.1
81.0
85.5
4.5
54.7
30.4
19.3
10.1
89.8
90.6
Commerce BEA
Census
current
periodic
1990 census
2000 census
ITA
NOAA
NMFS
OBA
USTTA
40.3
262.5
133.2
129.3
9.5
18.7
2.6
41.4
19.4
5.3
1.2
42.4
277.4
135.7
141.7
0.1
42.1
3.3
46.7
22.3
6.1
1.3
51.5
341.4
144.8
196.6
0.0
60.1
2.4
47.8
23.4
5.7
1.4
Defense Corps Eng
DMDC
OSD
4.2
3.3
2.1
4.1
3.3
2.4
4.2
3.3
2.2
EducationNCES87.090.0104.1
EnergyEIA
OSETI
Safety & Health
87.9
1.2
48.2
86.4
1.2
35.6
84.7
0.2
29.0
HHSACF
AHCPR
AoA
ATSDR
CDC
NCHS
HCFA
HRSA
IHS
NIH
NCI
NEI
NHLBI
NIA
NIAAA
NIAID
NIAMSD
NICHD
NIDA
NIDCD
NIDDK
NIDR
NIEHS
NINDS
NINR
OD
OASPE
SAMHSA
21.6
66.4
6.3
5.4
167.9
83.4
14.2
9.9
2.7
293.4
68.2
1.4
48.9
7.5
4.8
24.3
0.2
26.8
34.2
0.3
51.9
3.9
19.2
1.8
--
1.1
20.6
69.0
22.4
66.3
3.4
3.5
169.5
81.3
13.1
9.9
2.6
304.5
71.3
1.3
50.3
7.4
6.6
25.0
0.2
27.5
37.0
0.5
52.7
3.9
18.7
2.2
--
1.2
20.2
68.3
22.5
66.5
3.1
3.5
173.0
81.4
13.3
10.1
2.7
312.7
74.1
1.4
51.8
7.4
5.1
26.2
0.1
28.4
38.3
0.5
54.6
3.9
19.4
1.5
0.1
1.1
22.6
64.9
HUDCP&D
Housing
OFHEO
PD&R
P&IH
--
1.5
0.0
21.4
0.0
0.1
1.5
2.0
23.1
0.4
0.2
1.6
2.4
21.7
2.0
InteriorBoM
FWS
NBS
MMS
USGS
19.5
4.2
2.1
1.6
65.3
15.9
8.5
2.1
1.5
61.1
16.8
7.6
2.0
1.5
62.3
JusticeBJS
BOP
DEA
FBI
INS
24.7
2.2
0.8
5.8
1.2
25.5
2.4
0.8
4.7
1.3
26.2
2.4
0.8
4.8
11.3
LaborBLS
ESA
ETA
MSHA
OSHA
339.6
4.2
24.5
2.2
12.0
351.3
4.6
39.5
2.2
18.5
376.7
4.4
81.5
2.2
19.5
TransportationBTS
FAA
FHWA
FRA
FTA
MARAD
NHTSA
OST
15.0
5.6
27.3
1.5
2.0
3.4
22.2
0.8
17.0
5.9
29.6
1.5
2.3
3.2
21.8
0.6
22.0
5.6
28.7
1.5
1.5
3.1
24.1
0.6
TreasuryCustoms
IRS
SOI
6.8
28.6
23.9
7.1
38.0
29.4
7.2
39.3
29.4
Veterans Affairs 37.753.554.7
Other AgenciesAID
CPSC
EEOC
EPA
NASA
NSF
SBA
SSA
21.6
4.8
0.9
109.2
26.5
44.0
0.7
7.7
25.3
4.8
1.0
122.1
25.6
49.9
0.6
8.0
15.7
5.5
1.0
136.5
19.3
50.4
0.6
19.9
TOTAL 2448.72550.42757.3
TOTAL without 1990 and 2000 decennial censuses 2420.52508.22697.2
Note: Figures shown in Table 1 have been provided by the agencies and are derived from "total direct program" funds (line 00.91) shown in the program and financing schedule for these agencies in the President's FY 1996 budget. The symbol "--" indicates that the amount reported by the agency was less than $50,000. Components may not add up to stated totals because of rounding.


Highlights of Congressional Action on the
President's FY 1995 Budget Request

The figures for FY 1995 in Table 1 reflect Congressional action on the President's budget request for funding of statistical activities. The following are highlights of the impact of these appropriation levels on the programs of the principal statistical agencies:

Bureau of the Census: The appropriated level for FY 1995 was $27.5 million below the President's request. Funds totaling $6.2 million were not provided for planned program increases for services statistics, construction statistics, and manufacturing statistics. In addition, the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code research was reduced by $1.4 million; the 2000 decennial census planning budget was reduced by $6.6 million; the mid-decade computer modernization was reduced by $3.3 million; and the request of $7.4 million to develop further Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection (CASIC) was not provided. Funding was increased by Congress to accelerate work on poverty statistics and to prototype high performance computing technology for the 2000 census.

Bureau of Economic Analysis: The FY 1995 appropriation, which was $6.2 million below the President's request, did not provide funds requested by the Administration to modernize and extend the national accounts and to launch new initiatives, including the Integrated Environmental-Economic Satellite Accounts. Funds to redesign the information collection, processing, and estimation process also were reduced. (The BEA subsequently received a Departmental transfer of funds to provide sufficient resources to begin the redesign effort.) In addition, BEA began a process to designate a private custodian for its Composite Indexes of Leading, Coincident, and Lagging Indicators series. This effort resulted in a reprogramming of funds from the indicators program to address some of the needed improvements in the national economic accounts.

Bureau of Justice Statistics: FY 1995 funding was appropriated at the requested level, which included a base increase of $436,000 from the FY 1994 appropriated level.

Bureau of Labor Statistics: The FY 1995 appropriation was $15.8 million below the President's request. At the same time, additional funds were provided by the Congress for BLS to include Georgia and Virginia among the states for which direct monthly estimates of employment and unemployment are produced. Subsequently, Congress rescinded $0.7 million for that program and also rescinded $2.0 million for administrative functions.

Bureau of Transportation Statistics: FY 1995 funding was appropriated at the requested level. The $2.0 million increase in the agency's funding above the requested level reflects the transfer of the aviation information statistics program from the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

Economic Research Service: FY 1995 funding was appropriated at approximately the requested level.

Energy Information Administration: The FY 1995 appropriation was $0.4 million lower than the President's request. There was no significant impact on statistical programs from this reduction. Savings were achieved through efficiencies in data collection, reporting, processing, and publishing afforded by prior-year investments in new capabilities and technologies.

National Agricultural Statistics Service: The FY 1995 appropriation was $8.5 million below the President's request. Funds were not provided for proposed increases to the Distributed Data Base Systems program for the State Statistical Offices, the Pesticide Data Program, and the Restricted Use Pesticide Data program.

National Center for Education Statistics: The FY 1995 appropriation was $20.9 million below the President's request. This funding level required a change in the periodicity of core surveys that will result in less frequent collection of data in areas such as teacher attrition, student financial aid, pre-kindergarten schooling, and adult education. In addition, analyses of data previously collected will be reduced. Preparation for a 1996 assessment of art programs also had to be delayed.

National Center for Health Statistics: The FY 1995 appropriation was $2 million below the President's budget request. This decrease resulted in the postponement of the next cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) which was to begin in 1997; reducing the number of items collected from birth and death records; and minor adjustments to the timing of the Health Provider Surveys.

FY 1996 Budget Highlights

As shown in Table 1, the FY 1996 estimated budget submitted by the President for statistical activities covered by this report is estimated at $2,757.3 million. The following are highlights of proposed program changes in the principal statistical agencies and their associated costs (in millions of dollars). Additional details about these changes are provided in Chapter 2 of this report.

Bureau of the Census: Increases are provided for the Economic Statistics initiative that will improve services statistics (+$5.8), State and local government data for the gross domestic product (+$1.4), export statistics (+$1.6), construction statistics (+$1.3), restructuring of the Standard Industrial Classification (+$3.9), and Statistics 2000 initiative (+$2.3); Computer-Assisted Survey Information Collection initiative (+$11.5); American Community Survey (formerly Continuous Measurement Survey) initiative (+$11.0); Sample Redesign initiative (+$2.0); data processing systems modernization (+$12.4).

Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA): Increases are provided to strengthen the underlying source data for the economic accounts (+$1.6); to modernize and extend the economic accounts (+$3.3); and to develop a customer-oriented data collection and dissemination system (+$3.6).

Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS): The request does not include any program changes but does include an increase to the base from the FY 1995 appropriated level (+$0.6).

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS): Increases are requested for work related to the continuation of the periodic revision of the Consumer Price Index (+$6.2); government-wide revisions to both the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) and the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) systems (+$2.6); and new business surveys on emerging labor market issues (+$3.1).

Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS): Increases are provided for the expansion of the Transborder Freight Study; to initiate an Intermodal Equipment Inventory and Use Survey, a Nationwide Truck Activity Survey, and major extensions to the 1997 Economic Census and Census of Governments; and to establish an Information Technology Center (+$5.0).

Economic Research Service (ERS): Increases are provided to maintain statistical programs at the current level (+$1.2).

Energy Information Administration (EIA): The budget request provides for the same level of funding as the FY 1995 appropriation.

National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS): Increases are provided for the enhanced Distributed Processing Data Base Systems Program (+$1.1); the Pesticide Use Data Program (+$3.3); and the Integrated Pest Management/Restricted Use Pesticide Data program (+$3.0).

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES): Increases are provided for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)(+$5.2), and to enhance the general statistics program by increasing the frequency and types of data collected about the condition of, and trends in, education (+$8.8).

National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS): The budget request provides essentially the same level of funding as the FY 1995 appropriation.

Reimbursable Programs

Agencies whose missions are primarily or entirely statistical often perform statistical work for others on a reimbursable basis. These reimbursements come from other agencies within the same department or other Federal agencies, State governments, and occasionally the private sector or foreign governments. Some agencies that have reimbursable programs, for example, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (OASPE) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), do not necessarily perform the work. Rather, the reimbursable program money is used to purchase statistical work from other Federal agencies or the private sector.

Table 2 presents a list of agencies that reported performing at least $100,000 of statistical work on a reimbursable basis for State and local governments, the private sector, and/or other Federal agencies, ranked by the estimated size of the reimbursable program for FY 1996. As shown in the Appendix, of the estimated total of $425.6 million in reimbursable work, an estimated $339.8 million is performed for other Federal agencies. A large portion of the reimbursable work performed for other Federal agencies is funded through intradepartmental transfers, as discussed below.

Table 2: Estimated Agency Reimbursements for
Statistical Activities, FY 1996

(In millions of dollars)

AgencyDirect
Funding
Total
Reimbursable
Program
State/Local
Gov'ts
Private
Sector
Other
Federal
Agencies
Census341.4170.0 1.314.7 154.0
USGS62.3105.1 52.92.5 49.7
AHCPR66.538.1 0038.1
NCHS81.421.5 00.920.6
BLS376.721.2 0.11.6 19.5
CDC (w/o NCHS)173.011.4 00.910.5
NASS89.89.0 1.707.3
OASPE22.68.3 008.3
FAS30.46.8 006.8
NOAA47.86.7 0.14.32.3
ERS54.75.7 005.7
NRCS90.64.7 2.402.3
EIA84.73.0003.0
OBA5.72.7 0.11.80.8
NCES104.12.4 002.4
IRS/SOI39.31.9 0.1--1.8
FS10.11.3 0.50.10.7
NSF50.41.1 001.1
HCFA13.31.0001.0
CPSC5.50.7000.7
BOP2.40.5000.5
BTS22.00.5000.5
ATSDR3.50.5000.5
BJS26.20.5000.5
BEA51.50.5--0.30.2
USTTA1.40.50.10.30.1
NIH312.70.4000.4
FHWA28.70.2000.2
HRSA10.10.2000.2
INS11.30.1000.1
Notes: Reimbursements from the private sector also include funds received from foreign governments. Agencies receiving funds from foreign governments are: Census ($3,206,000); USGS ($140,000); BLS ($250,000); NOAA ($200,000); OBA ($11,000); and BEA ($88,000). Components may not add up to stated totals because of rounding. The symbol "--" indicates that the amount reported by the agency was less than $50,000.


For FY 1996, the Census Bureau has the largest reimbursable program, totaling $170 million. Most of this work ($154 million) entails data collections and preparation of tabulations for other Federal agencies. In particular, the Census Bureau expects to perform approximately $52.6 million of reimbursable work for the Department of Labor, including the Current Population Survey, the Point of Purchase Survey, and the Consumer Expenditure Survey for BLS.

Examples of reimbursable work that the Census Bureau expects to perform for other Federal agencies include: the National Schools and Staffing Surveys, the Private Schools Survey, and the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System Survey for NCES; the Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey for EIA; the National Health Interview Survey, the National Hospital Discharge Survey, the National Mortality Followback, and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for NCHS; the American Housing Survey and the Housing Sales Survey for the Department of Housing and Urban Development; the National Crime Survey and National Prisoner Statistics Program for BJS; the Commodity Flow Study and the American Travel Survey for the Department of Transportation; and the Survey of College Graduates for the National Science Foundation. In addition, the Census Bureau receives funds from the Agency for International Development and from foreign governments for training and advising in statistical techniques.

The Water Resources Division in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) has the second largest reimbursable program estimated at $105.1 million. Among the Federal agencies, USGS performs the largest amount (almost $53 million) of work for the States through a Federal-State Cooperative Program. This program provides for water resources appraisals, hydrologic data collection and analysis, areal water-resources appraisals and special analytical and interpretive studies. The Water Resources Division also expects to perform almost $50 million in statistical work for other Federal agencies including: hydrologic data collections and analyses for the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, Energy, State, and Transportation; other agencies in the Department of the Interior; the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).

The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) in HHS has the third largest reimbursable program, estimated at $38.1 million. This reimbursable work is conducted through the use of grants, contracts, and interagency agreements for other agencies within HHS. These intradepartmental transfers of funds will be used for the third National Medical Expenditure Survey and to research and evaluate the effectiveness of medical treatment and health services under the Medical Treatment Effectiveness Program.

Slightly over half of BLS's reimbursable work is done for other agencies in the Department of Labor. This work includes, for example, an estimated $7.2 million that will be transferred to BLS from the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) for the Mass Layoffs Statistics Program, for surveys of training availability in companies and displaced workers surveys, for the National Longitudinal Wage data base project, and for providing labor statistics for Vietnam era veterans. In addition, the Employment Standards Administration will transfer $3.3 million to BLS to conduct studies of occupational wages in selected areas and industries. The BLS also is reimbursed by the Labor Department's Bureau of International Labor Affairs for providing statistical training for foreign participants, and by the Employment Standards Administration to conduct studies of occupational wages in selected areas and industries.

A large portion of the reimbursable work in HHS is done within the Department. As noted above, most of the reimbursable work performed by AHCPR will be funded from transfers from the Public Health Service (PHS) one-percent evaluation fund. Most of the reimbursable statistical work performed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) including NCHS is done for other agencies within HHS. All the reimbursable work of the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) is done for the PHS' Medical Treatment Effectiveness Program.

Intradepartmental transfers also support much of the reimbursable work shown in Table 2 for Department of Agriculture (USDA) agencies. Approximately $6.3 million of NASS' reimbursable work is done for other agencies in USDA. In particular, NASS will receive from the Economic Research Service $3.4 million for survey support in the areas of farm costs and returns. The NASS will also be reimbursed by the USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service for providing training and technical assistance in statistics. The ERS will receive approximately $5.7 million for performing evaluation studies and analyses for other USDA agencies. The Foreign Agricultural Service will provide an estimated $6.8 million in statistical services to the Commodity Credit Corporation in support of export programs. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will receive approximately $0.2 million for soil survey work on Forest Service land.

Purchases of Statistical Services

Agencies contract for statistical services with other Federal agencies, State and local governments, or with private sector organizations. Table 3 shows the agencies with total purchases of at least $1 million, ranked by total purchases; information on agencies with smaller estimated purchases is provided in the Appendix.

Table 3: Estimated Agency Purchases of
Statistical Services, FY 1996

(In millions of dollars)

v
AgencyDirect
Funding
Total
Purchases
State/
Local
Govt's
Private
Sector
Other
Federal
Agencies
BLS376.7139.081.43.054.5
NCES104.197.42.883.710.9
EPA136.592.552.339.80.4
NIH313.783.8--73.99.9
ETA81.581.180.50.60
SAMHSA64.962.018.643.30.1
CDC (w/o NCHS)173.060.529.014.716.8
NSF50.451.5047.93.6
EIA84.740.6040.60
NCHS81.437.113.28.015.9
AHCPR66.534.50.532.02.0
OASPE22.630.9025.65.3
FHWA28.725.99.711.94.3
NASS89.824.821.53.3--
DOE (Safety & Health)29.0 24.300 24.3
ACF22.522.5 0.418.53.7
HUD (PD&R)21.721.7 00.521.2
BJS26.221.3 3.62.515.2
FCS19.319.3019.20.1
NHTSA24.118.85.012.21.6
HCFA13.312.4012.30.1
BTS22.011.30011.3
ERS54.78.52.20.65.7
NOAA47.84.91.63.30
FAA5.64.701.92.8
ARS4.54.304.20.1
FWS7.63.5 0.503.0
OSHA19.53.103.10
ESA4.42.90.502.4
IRS39.32.702.20.5
FAS30.42.1002.1
AoA3.12.002.00
P&IH2.02.002.00
Census341.41.9--0.31.6
USTTA1.41.901.40.5
BEA51.51.8--0.11.7
FRA1.51.601.20.4
FTA1.51.501.50
CPSC5.51.40.11.30
ATSDR3.51.10.50.6--
Note: Components may not sum to stated totals because of rounding. The symbol "--" indicates that the amount reported by the agency was less than $50,000.

When the contract is a transfer of funds to another Federal agency, the contract is a direct program obligation in the budget of the purchasing agency, and is part of the reimbursable program of the agency providing the service. Examples of these kinds of purchases of statistical services were given above in the section on reimbursable programs. The National Science Foundation (NSF), U.S. Travel and Tourism Administration (USTTA), and OASPE can purchase more than their direct funding for statistics allows because they receive the difference from other Federal agencies under their reimbursable programs.

The four largest purchasers of statistical services are BLS ($139 million), CDC including NCHS ($97.6 million), NCES ($97.4 million), and EPA ($92.5 million). They are followed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ($83.8 million) and the Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration (ETA) ($81.1 million). During FY 1996, it is estimated that Federal agencies covered by this report will purchase $1,070.2 million in statistical services. Of this total approximately half of the services will be purchased from the private sector, about 30 percent from State and local governments, and approximately 20 percent from other Federal agencies.

The largest purchasers of statistical services from the States are BLS ($81.5 million), ETA ($80.5 million), EPA ($52.3 million), CDC including NCHS ($42.2 million), NASS ($21.5 million), and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) ($18.6 million). The BLS funds support the cooperative labor force statistics program. The ETA funds support the States in developing the statistical resources for the One-Stop Career Centers. The EPA funds support State operation of the nationwide air quality monitoring network. The CDC funds reimburse the States for their participation in the collection of vital statistics and for their cooperation in the reporting of diseases. The NASS funds support data collection services provided by the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture. The SAMHSA funds are provided to States to implement the minimum data standards developed by the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program, and to develop an assessment of their needs for substance abuse treatment and prevention services under the block grant program. In all cases, the cooperation of the States is essential to the production of Federal data.

Based on the information shown in the Appendix, the agencies reported that they expect to purchase an estimated $521 million in statistical services from the private sector during FY 1996. Of that total, approximately $387 million in purchases from the private sector are made by the following eight agencies: NCES ($83.7 million), NIH ($73.9 million), NSF ($47.9 million), SAMHSA ($43.3 million), EIA ($40.6 million), EPA ($39.8 million), AHCPR ($32.0 million), and OASPE ($25.6 million). The private sector provides a variety of services, such as survey design, data collection and processing, analysis, program evaluation, preparation of reports, data dissemination, computer services, and methodological research and development.

The Appendix presents estimates (rounded to the nearest $100,000) of direct funding, reimbursements, and purchases for FY 1996, as reported by each of the agencies covered in this report.


CHAPTER 2: Programs and Program Changes

This chapter presents brief descriptions of the statistical activities of the agencies that are covered in this report. The chapter highlights program changes for Federal statistical activities for FY 1996 as proposed in the President's budget. Hence, the focus is not on base program activities that continue to be supported by the budget request, but rather on new activities, improvements or reductions in the existing base programs, or any other important changes that affect an agency's statistical program.

For purposes of this discussion, the statistical programs are divided into the following categories: Health and Safety Statistics; Social and Demographic Statistics; Statistics on Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment; and Economic Statistics.

Health and Safety Statistics

Health

The principal agency that produces general-purpose health data is the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The NCHS is responsible for the collection, analysis, and dissemination of statistics on the nature and extent of the health, illness, and disability of the U.S. population; the impact of illness and disability on the economy; the effects of environmental, social, and other health hazards; the use of health care services; health resources; family formation, growth, and dissolution; and vital events (births, deaths, marriages, and divorces). The CDC also provides data on morbidity, infectious and chronic diseases, occupational diseases and injuries, and vaccine efficacy.

The statistical activities of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) support the design and implementation of epidemiological studies, clinical trials, biomedical research, and laboratory investigations conducted by the various institutes. The NIH also supports data collections on health and health-related topics by Federal agencies, industry, State and local governments, and private nonprofit organizations.

The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) collects, analyzes, and disseminates data on health care use and expenditures, and supports studies on the outcomes of medical treatment and health services. AHCPR and NCHS are jointly responsible for the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, which produces annual national estimates for a variety of measures related to health status, health insurance coverage, health care use, and expenditures and sources of payments for health services.

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) collects, maintains, analyzes, and disseminates information relating to serious diseases, mortality, and human exposure to toxic or hazardous substances, and establishes registries necessary for long-term followup or specific scientific studies.

The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) collects administrative data associated with its oversight of the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and also studies the quality of care delivered by those programs.

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) collects data about general health services, the health professions workforce, and resource issues relating to access, equity, quality, and cost of care; and maintains the Scientific Registry for organ transplants.

The Indian Health Service (IHS) collects information regarding the status of the health care delivery program for American Indians and Alaska Natives.

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) provides information on health problems related to the use and abuse of drugs and alcohol, and the mental health condition of the population.

The Department of Energy's Office of Environment, Safety, and Health conducts epidemiological studies of the health effects of exposure to radiation and other hazardous substances.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Safety

Statistics on safety are produced by the following agencies:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) collects and reports data on the occurrence of work related injuries and illnesses.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) maintains a national injury and illness recordkeeping system based upon employer records, which is used to determine the cases that are included in the annual BLS safety and health statistics survey.

The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) collects current information on accidents, injuries, and illnesses in the mining industry, including mine, victim, and equipment characteristics, as well as causal information. This information is coded, computerized, and analyzed on a daily basis to provide current accident, injury, and illness information to MSHA's inspectorate, engineering staff, and education and training staff.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) conducts data collection, analysis, and dissemination activities on consumer product-related hazards and potential hazards. As part of its statistical programs, CPSC maintains the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), which provides national consumer product-related injury statistics based on the reporting of a sample of hospital emergency rooms.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Social and Demographic Statistics

2000 Decennial Census

Current Demographic Statistics

The following agencies sponsor data collections and studies that produce current demographic statistics or provide information about special population groups in support of policy analysis, policy research, and program planning and evaluation:

The Census Bureau's current demographic statistics program provides information on the number, geographic distribution, and social and economic characteristics of the population, and supports tests of new approaches and concepts for demographic surveys.

The Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) has responsibility in the Department of Defense for collecting and integrating manpower and personnel data to support department-wide studies, analysis, research, and reporting requirements.

The Administration for Children and Families (ACF) collects information for the evaluation of its programs for children and youth, such as Headstart, Job Opportunities and Basic Skills, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, child support enforcement, adoption assistance, foster care, child care, and child abuse programs.

The statistical activities of the Administration on Aging (AoA) are conducted in support of the research, analysis, and evaluation of programs to meet the needs of the elderly population.

The Food and Consumer Service (FCS), formerly the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), conducts surveys, program evaluations, and studies to evaluate the Food Stamp, Child Nutrition, and other food assistance programs which it administers.

The Agricultural Research Service (ARS) has assumed the responsibility for the nationwide food consumption surveys that previously were conducted by the Human Nutrition Information Service (HNIS). (Legislation passed on February 20, 1994, transferred the functions and staff of HNIS to ARS.)

The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (OASPE) funds studies on policy issues related to programs in HHS.

The Social Security Administration (SSA) collects, tabulates, and publishes data on the Old-Age and Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs and their beneficiary populations. The SSA also performs actuarial and demographic research to assess the impact of program changes or alternatives.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) statistical program provides data on the volume, characteristics, financing, price, and suitability of housing in the United States.

The statistical programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) focus on providing estimates of the veteran population, including socioeconomic data; on analyses of patient use of VA health care; on the medical care provided to veterans in VA medical centers, nursing homes, domiciliaries and outpatient clinics; and on medical research.

The Agency for International Development (AID) collects and analyzes data on population and family planning to assist developing countries in planning and evaluating population programs and programs for socioeconomic development.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) collects data from public and private employers and labor organizations about the composition of their workforces by sex and by racial and ethnic categories. These data are used to carry out EEOC's enforcement activities under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The National Science Foundation's (NSF) Division of Science Resources Studies statistical program comprises surveys that measure the magnitude and characteristics of the domestic and international resources devoted to science and engineering. The NSF also provides funding in support of social science research and studies, such as the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, the General Social Survey, and the National Election Studies.

The Office of Science, Education, and Technology Information (OSETI), in the Department of Energy, provides information on degree attainment in science and engineering, and forecasts the availability of trained persons in the fields of science necessary for research and development in the energy area.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Crime and Justice

Statistics related to crime and justice are collected by the following agencies within the Department of Justice:

The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) collects, analyzes, publishes, and disseminates statistical information on crime, criminal offenders, victims of crime, and the operations of justice systems at all levels of government and internationally.

The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) prepares projections of the prison population and conducts studies on such topics as recidivism, inmate programs, inmate misconduct, and institutional social climate.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) produces data on Federal drug law enforcement.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) produces statistics on Federal criminal offenses reported to the police.

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) produces and analyzes data on immigrants, refugees, temporary visitors (nonimmigrants), naturalizations, and apprehension and removal of illegal aliens.

New activities planned for FY 1996 to improve data related to crime and immigration are as follows:

Education

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) in the Department of Education collects, analyzes, and publishes statistics on education in the United States; conducts studies on international comparisons of education statistics; and provides leadership in developing and promoting the use of standardized terminology and definitions for the collection of those statistics.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Transportation Statistics

The following agencies provide statistics on transportation:

The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) compiles, analyzes, and makes accessible information on the Nation's transportation systems; collects information on intermodal transportation and other areas as needed; and enhances the quality and effectiveness of DOT's statistical programs through research, development of guidelines, and promotion of improvements in data acquisition and use.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) collects data on aviation safety.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) collects, analyzes, and disseminates data on the Nation's highway system, financing, travel, fuel consumption, extent of the highway system, vehicle registrations, drivers licenses, and personal travel characteristics.

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) collects and disseminates public mass transportation financial and operating data.

The Maritime Administration (MARAD) maintains data bases on foreign trade, vessels, port facilities, shipbuilding and repair, equipment owned by American steamship and container leasing companies, and maritime employment.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) collect information on motor vehicle-related accidents and fatalities and highway safety.

The Office of the Secretary of Transportation collects, analyzes, and publishes data in support of the Department's programs and transportation policy decision making.

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) collects data on railroad traffic, accidents, and grade crossings.

The United States Travel and Tourism Administration (USTTA) in the Department of Commerce provides data on international travel markets; traveler characteristics, motivations, destinations, and spending patterns; and projections of future visitors to the United States.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Statistics on Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment

Environment

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitors the quality of the air; the quality of drinking, surface and ground water; ecosystem status; and the introduction of toxic or hazardous substances into the environment. It conducts research and studies to provide baseline data and to evaluate and support environmental monitoring systems.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) gathers worldwide environmental data about the ocean, earth, air, space, and sun and their interactions to describe and predict the state of the physical environment. The NOAA National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service and National Climate Data Center maintain archives and environmental data bases that support statistical analyses and research throughout the Federal Government and the academic community. These include crop type and crop yield analyses for the Department of Agriculture; climatic, atmospheric, and environmental data for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Department of Defense; and remote-sensed data to support high-technology cartography. The NOAA conducts research and studies to provide baseline data and to evaluate and support environmental monitoring systems.

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) collects remote-sensed data to support climate research and to describe and measure the energy and environmental phenomena that may contribute to climate variation and change.

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) through its mapping program acquires and maintains basic data to support digital cartography throughout the Federal Government (e.g., Geographic Information Systems and geographic support for surveys). The Water Resources Division in the USGS maintains the National Water Resources Research and Information System and the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. The USGS collects, analyzes, interprets, and makes available information on the quantity, quality, and location of the Nation's ground and surface waters. In cooperation with the States, academia, and other Federal agencies, the USGS administers the National Trends Network for monitoring acid precipitation chemistry in the United States.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Energy and Minerals

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects and disseminates data on energy reserves, production, consumption, distribution, prices, and technology. Coverage of EIA's programs includes data on coal, petroleum, gas, electric, and nuclear energy. The EIA also provides information on international energy markets and publishes the State Energy Price and Expenditure Report.

The Bureau of Mines (BoM) collects, interprets, analyzes, and disseminates information on mineral resources and production, consumption, and recycling for virtually every commercially important nonfuel mineral material.

The Minerals Management Service (MMS) collects data on off-shore oil, gas, and minerals as part of its responsibility for management of both the Outer Continental Shelf Lands and the Royalty Management Programs. The MMS is responsible for resource evaluation and classification, lease management activities, and the collection of revenues from minerals leasing.

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) maintains the Mineral Resource Data System data base, which contains information on the location and geologic occurrence of minerals and mineral commodities. The USGS also has two computer-based information systems of onshore oil and gas resources to aid in resource assessment studies. One contains information on the size of oil and gas pools and fields, their year of discovery, and their rate of production; the other has records on individual wells. The National Coal Resources Data System contains areal or regional point-source information on U.S. coal resources.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Soil, Forest, Fish, Wildlife, and Public Lands

The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), conducts soil surveys and maintains and updates a national soils data base containing physical land facts. The NRCS also administers a Snow Survey program for making water supply forecasts to manage seasonal use of water for irrigation, flood control, fish and wildlife, recreation, power generation, municipal and industrial water supply, and water quality management.

The Forest Service (FS) conducts renewable resource inventories of forest lands and collects statistics on forest products. These data are used to identify trends in extent, condition, ownership, quantity and quality of timber, and other forest resources.

The statistical activities of the National Biological Survey (NBS) include research and monitoring of trends in contaminant residue levels in birds and fish by geographic location. The NBS annual bird banding program is conducted to determine the distribution, mortality, and survival of migratory game and nongame species. Data from NBS' annual breeding bird survey are used to identify species whose populations are declining and which may eventually become candidates for listing under the Endangered Species Act.

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in NOAA collects and publishes data on the volume and value of commercial fish and shellfish landings; the catch by recreational fishermen; employment of people and craft in the fisheries; number of recreational fishermen; production of manufactured fishery products; and fishery prices.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) conducts annual surveys to monitor the waterfowl, dove, and woodcock populations, and to evaluate waterfowl harvests.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Economic Statistics

Periodic Censuses

The Census Bureau conducts several periodic censuses every five years covering the years ending in 2 and 7. The Economic Censuses include censuses of manufacturing and mineral industries, construction industries, retail and wholesale trade, service industries, and transportation; they also provide statistics on businesses owned by minorities and women and companies operating at multiple locations. The Census of Governments collects State and local data on public finance, public employment, governmental organization, and taxable property values. The Census of Agriculture collects information on the number of farms, farm acreage, operating expenditures, value of farmland, land use, crops and livestock, and equipment.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Current Economic Statistics

The current economic statistics program of the Census Bureau provides information on retail and wholesale trade and selected service industries; construction activity such as housing permits and starts, value of new construction, residential alterations and repairs, and quarterly price indexes for new, single-family houses; quantity and value of industrial output; foreign trade; and State and local government activities.

The International Trade Administration (ITA) in the Department of Commerce uses data on imports, exports, production, prices, foreign direct investment in the United States, and other economic data to analyze domestic and foreign market situations.

The Office of Business Analysis (OBA) in the Department of Commerce makes current economic statistics available through the Economic Bulletin Board and operates the National Trade Data Bank and the National Economic, Social, and Environmental Data Bank.

The Corps of Engineers in the Department of Defense collects and publishes statistical data on waterborne commerce and vessel operations on waterways, ports, and harbors of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

The U.S. Customs Service verifies tariff and trade data which are tabulated, analyzed, and disseminated by the Census Bureau.

The Small Business Administration (SBA) maintains a small business data base and conducts economic and statistical research into matters affecting small businesses.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

National Accounts

The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) is responsible for the preparation, development, and interpretation of the national income and product accounts, summarized by the Gross Domestic Product (GDP); the wealth accounts, which show the business and other components of national wealth; the input-output accounts, which trace the interrelationships among industrial markets; personal income and related economic v series by geographic area; the U.S. balance of payments accounts and associated foreign investment accounts; and measures relating to environmental change within the framework of the national economic accounts. The BEA's work also encompasses the preparation and analysis of other measures of business activity, including various tools for forecasting economic developments.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Statistics of Income

The Statistics of Income (SOI) Division in the Internal Revenue Service provides annual income, financial, and tax data based on individual and corporate tax returns and returns filed by tax-exempt organizations. SOI also provides periodic data based on other returns, such as those filed by estates, as well as in-depth analyses of various tax-related computations, including those for the foreign tax credit and for gain or loss from sales of capital assets.

No major program changes are planned for FY 1996.

Labor

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) produces statistics on employment and unemployment; consumer expenditures; prices and living conditions; wages and employee benefits; industrial relations activities; productivity and technological changes in U.S. industries; projections of economic growth, the labor force, and employment by industry and occupation; and occupational injuries and illnesses.

The statistical activities of the Employment Standards Administration (ESA) support surveys of occupational wages in selected industries.

The statistical activities of the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) support the collection and dissemination of local, State, and national occupational, wage, and other labor market information.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:

Agriculture

Several agencies in the Department of Agriculture produce most of the data on agricultural activity:

The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) collects, summarizes, analyzes, and publishes agricultural production and marketing data on a wide range of items including: number of farms and land in farms; acreage, yield, production, and stocks of grains, hay, oilseeds, cotton, potatoes, tobacco, fruits, selected vegetables, floriculture, and selected specialty crops; inventories and production of hogs, cattle, sheep and wool, goats and mohair, mink, catfish, trout, poultry, eggs, and dairy products; prices received by farmers for products, prices paid for commodities and services, and related indexes; cold storage supplies; agricultural chemical use; and related areas of the agricultural economy. Estimates for approximately 120 crops and 45 livestock items are published in over 400 reports each year.

The statistical work of the Economic Research Service (ERS) includes research, situation and outlook analysis, and development of economic and statistical indicators in four areas -- commercial agriculture, food and consumer economics, natural resources and environment, and rural economy.

The Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) maintains a worldwide agricultural market intelligence and commodity reporting service to gather information on world agricultural production and trade. FAS analyzes this information to assess the foreign supply and demand conditions in order to provide estimates of the current situation and to forecast the export potential for U.S. agricultural commodities. The FAS program serves as the analytical foundation for USDA's export programs and is an important factor in trade policy efforts.

Major program changes and new activities planned for FY 1996 are as follows:


CHAPTER 3: Long-Range Plans

This chapter describes selected interagency initiatives to improve the performance of Federal statistical programs. The first section provides brief updates on a number of activities that were discussed in the report on statistical programs for FY 1995. The second section provides information on several new activities.

Updates on Previously Reported Activities

Sharing of Statistical Information

Congress has recognized that a confidential relationship between statistical agencies and their respondents is essential for effective statistical programs. However, the specific statutory formulas devised to implement this principle in different agencies have created difficult barriers to effective working relationships between these agencies. The development of mechanisms to establish a uniform confidentiality policy that substantially eliminates the risks of sharing confidential data will permit significant improvements in data used for both public and private decisions without the current duplication of effort and without compromising public confidence in the integrity and security of their reports to the Federal government.

Initiatives of the Statistical Policy Office to enhance public confidence in the stewardship of sensitive data in Federal statistical programs and to permit limited sharing of confidential data for exclusively statistical purposes received a substantial impetus in the 1995 reauthorization of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) which was signed into law by the President on May 22, 1995. The Act strongly endorses the principles embodied in statistical confidentiality pledges and charges OMB to promote sharing of data for statistical purposes within a strong confidentiality framework. The final language of the new PRA also incorporates both substantive and technical amendments designed to strengthen confidentiality protection in sections 3504(e), 3506(e), 3506(g), and 3510(b). Congressional endorsement of statistical confidentiality principles was also reflected in OMB's revised Paperwork Rule adopted in August 1995.

OMB currently expects to seek public comment on an order that would clarify, and make consistent, government policy protecting the privacy and confidentiality interests of individuals or organizations who provide data for any Federal statistical program. The order is intended to assure respondents who supply statistical information that their responses would be held in confidence and would not be used against them in any government action. It would at the same time aim to resolve a number of ambiguities in existing law and to give additional weight and stature to policies that statistical agencies have pursued for decades.

2000 Decennial Census Planning

Efforts to reengineer the 2000 decennial census have been driven by two major concerns. First, there is general agreement that traditional counting methods have limited potential to provide further gains in accomplishing a complete enumeration of the increasingly diverse population of the United States; such methods are expensive and have been only marginally effective in counting the people in several population groups. Second, the cost of conducting decennial censuses has increased dramatically in the past few decades. Finding new ways to deal effectively with both concerns has been the motivating force in reengineering the 2000 decennial census. The Statistical Policy Office is working in cooperation with the Department of Commerce and OMB Program Examiners to develop, monitor, and evaluate research and testing of alternative designs for the 2000 census that could yield both reduction of the differential undercoverage and cost savings.

The FY 1996 budget proposes funding to continue the Census Bureau's research and development efforts to examine fundamental changes for the future. During 1996, the Census Bureau will evaluate the results of the 1995 Census Test which addressed the most promising options for taking the next decennial census. Sampling and estimation procedures will be tested as a means to reduce both the differential in the count and the cost of the census. Further work will be undertaken on exploring statistical techniques and the use of administrative records to estimate the number and types of people missed in the census, while the decennial census is being conducted, so that the combined results would produce a "one-number" census. At the same time, proposed content for the 2000 census continues to be reviewed by Federal agencies to determine items that are specifically mandated in legislation, those that are required by legislation, and those that are requested by agencies for programmatic uses.

The Census Bureau will also continue its work on the Master Address File (MAF) and the sharing of addresses with State and local governments. Public Law 103-140 assigns to OMB the task of developing an appeals process to resolve differences between local areas and the Census Bureau. The Census Bureau has published a Federal Register (60 FR 45137-40) notice on the acceptance of local addresses for consideration in the decennial census, and further work on developing the proposed process will be undertaken during the coming year.

Economic Statistics Initiative

Building on previous endeavors, the Statistical Policy Office is continuing its efforts to strengthen Federal economic statistics. The initiative seeks to improve the quality of statistics in rapidly changing areas of the economy where accurate information is most needed. Implementation will result in a fundamental reorientation of the Federal statistical system to inform public and private responses to the economic challenges facing the United States by recognizing the basic structural changes of the last 30 years.

As part of this effort, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) announced on December 22, 1994, the initiation of a "Mid-Decade Strategic Review" of the Nation's economic accounts. Initial steps have included: (1) the January 11, 1995, release of seven papers providing background material, tallies of shortcomings, and alternative proposals to maintain the accuracy, reliability, and relevance of the economic accounts; (2) a proposed strategic plan to improve the economic accounts published in the Bureau of Economic Analysis' February 1995 Survey of Current Business; and (3) a March 21, 1995, conference of users of the accounts to present the findings of the review and discuss the plan.

In response to comments received from these initial steps, BEA revised its proposed strategic plan. This revised plan, published in the April 1995 Survey of Current Business, outlined the improvements that will be incorporated as BEA proceeds with this initiative. These include the introduction of new measures of real output and prices based on an annual-weighted index; the implementation of an improved empirical basis for the estimates of depreciation and capital stocks; and the treatment of government purchases of structures and equipment as an investment. The plan also includes developing new methods and concepts for measuring changes in output and prices for difficult-to-measure goods and services; updating and improving measurements in services and other industries; improving measures of investment, savings, and wealth; and improving the coverage of international transactions.

Revision of the Consumer Price Index

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is the principal source of information concerning trends in consumer prices and inflation in the United States. The measure is used extensively for economic analysis and policy formulation in both the public and private sectors, to escalate contract costs among individuals and organizations, and to index government payments and receipts.

In order to maintain the relevance of the CPI, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) undertakes a comprehensive updating of the index approximately every 10 years. The revision provides opportunities to reflect changes in the geographic distribution of the population and in consumers' buying habits, to incorporate improvements in technology and index methodology, and to redesign survey questionnaires and computer systems to make the index a more accurate and reliable reflection of economic conditions. An updated CPI, based upon the 1990 distribution of the U.S. urban population and the 1993 - 1995 pattern of consumer expenditures, will be introduced in January 1998. The BLS budget for FY 1996 requests funding for work on the revision scheduled for completion in 2000.

As part of its continuing effort to improve the accuracy of the CPI, BLS introduced a number of methodological changes beginning with the index for January 1995. These improvements affected the food at home, prescription drugs, residential rent, and owners equivalent rent components of the index. Together, these improvements are estimated to reduce the annual increase in the CPI by about 0.1 percentage point.

Additional BLS research in 1995 indicated that a further adjustment to index methods was warranted in order to address a systematic upward bias stemming from the way price changes in the CPI are calculated at the lowest level of item detail. Until the specific details of the further modifications have been determined, it is not possible to say precisely how they will affect the CPI. Based upon earlier research, and upon the informed judgment of BLS research staff, however, the BLS estimates that these further modifications could reduce the annual rate of increase in the CPI by between 0.1 and 0.3 percentage points. BLS expects to announce a time schedule for the incorporation of the additional modifications early in calendar 1996.

Economic Classification Policy Committee

During the past 3 years, the Economic Classification Policy Committee (ECPC), chartered by OMB to conduct a "fresh slate" examination of economic classifications for statistical purposes, has released for comment a series of papers that focus on such issues as the need for a conceptual framework for the system, aggregations and hierarchies, collectibility of data, criteria for establishing industries, service industry classifications, international comparability, product code groupings, and time series.

In 1994, the ECPC entered into an agreement with Statistics Canada and Mexico's Instituto Nacional de Estad¡stica, Geograf¡a e Inform tica (INEGI) to establish a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) that will be based on a production-oriented concept. The three countries have agreed to place special emphasis on developing classifications for service industries, new and emerging industries, and industries engaged in the production of advanced technologies. The NAICS will provide comparability for the three countries at the four-digit level and comparability with the United Nation's International Standard Industrial Classification system at the two-digit level.

In July 1994, OMB published a Federal Register (59 FR 38092-96) notice soliciting public comment on the usefulness and advisability of a common North American system for industry classifications; the proposed conceptual framework for the NAICS; and the proposed next steps in the development of the classification system for detailed industries. In addition, the notice requested proposals for new industries and for changing the boundaries of existing industries, and for market-oriented, or demand-based, groupings of economic data. During FY 1995, responses to this notice were evaluated by the U.S. team and work on developing the proposed NAICS continued in joint meetings among representatives of the three countries. In March 1995, the ECPC released a report containing a summary of the public comments that were received in response to the July 1994 Federal Register notice and provided further information on ECPC activities that relate to these comments.

In July 1995, OMB published a third Federal Register (60 FR 38436-52) notice seeking comments on the usefulness and advisability of several proposed industry revisions. The notice presented the proposed NAICS structures for petroleum and coal products manufacturing, chemical manufacturing, and rubber and plastics manufacturing; broadcasting and telecommunications; and food services and drinking places and accommodations. Subsequent Federal Register notices will seek comment on other industry groupings of sector and subsector proposals.

Plans for FY 1996 include final OMB decisions related to the entire NAICS structure coupled with key statistical agency actions to prepare for NAICS implementation. To reach decisions on the NAICS structure, the ECPC and OMB will review all public comments received on industry sector and subsector proposals, publish a complete proposed NAICS structure for public comment early in 1996, review comments and publish a complete revised NAICS structure for final comments in mid-1996, and review the final public comments and prepare a notice of OMB's final NAICS classification decisions. Key agency actions planned to prepare for NAICS implementation include ECPC assistance in reviewing and responding to public comments; BLS preparation and publication of regulations and instructions needed by cooperating State agencies to implement NAICS; and Census Bureau completion of detailed preparations to collect, process, and publish the 1997 Economic Census statistics based on the NAICS structure.

Occupational Classification Policy Committee

Rapid changes in both the U.S. and world economies have brought the U.S. Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) under increasing criticism. The 1993 International Occupational Classification Conference hosted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics provided a forum for exploring the issues and for considering new approaches to classifying occupations. Papers presented at the conference and the discussion and insights that they generated strongly indicated that the time has arrived to take a fresh look at the concepts, methodologies, procedures, and uses of occupational classifications for statistical purposes. To address criticisms of current approaches and foster a resolution process, the Statistical Policy Office invited the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to chair an interagency Standard Occupational Classification Policy Committee consisting of representatives from the BLS, the Census Bureau, the Defense Manpower Data Center, the Employment and Training Administration, the Office of Personnel Management, and, ex officio, the National Occupational Information Coordinating Committee, the National Science Foundation, and OMB.

The Standard Occupational Classification Policy Committee is charged with revising and modernizing the SOC and integrating the structure of the SOC and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles by the late 1990's in time to incorporate the new SOC classifications in the 2000 decennial census. The revision is intended to produce a pragmatic occupational classification system that will support economic analysis, strengthen the ties between education and work force data, unify Federal agency occupational classification usage, and foster international comparability.

On February 28, 1995, OMB published a notice in the Federal Register (60 FR 10998-11002) announcing the SOC revision process and requesting public comment on the uses of occupational data, the purpose and scope of occupational classification, the principles underlying the current SOC, conceptual options for the new SOC, and the Standard Occupational Classification Revision Policy Committee (SOCRPC) process. Based on those comments, the SOCRPC provided recommendations to OMB that were the subject of an October 5, 1995, Federal Register (60 FR 52284-86) notice. This notice solicited: (1) public comment on the SOCRPC's recommendations to OMB on the purpose and scope of the new SOC, the principles underlying the new SOC, and the unified conceptual framework to use to guide the revision, and (2) proposals from the public for changes to the existing SOC at the detailed 4-digit level based on the principles and conceptual foundation presented in the notice.

An additional Federal Register notice is planned for the fall of 1996 on the SOCRPC's recommendations for changes to the existing SOC at the 4-digit level. These changes will be based on the principles and unified conceptual framework agreed upon after review of the comments to the October 1995 notice as well as proposals from the public. The SOC revision is tentatively scheduled for implementation beginning in July 1997. All Federal agencies that collect occupational data are expected to utilize the new system.

Classification of Data on Race and Ethnicity

OMB's Statistical Policy Directive No. 15 on Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting provides standard classifications for record keeping, collection, and presentation of these data. The current categories, adopted in 1977, were developed in response to needs expressed by both the Executive Branch agencies and the Congress to provide for the collection and use of compatible, nonduplicated, exchangeable racial and ethnic data by Federal agencies. During the past few years, the Directive has come under increasing criticism. Citizens who report information about themselves and users of the information collected by Federal agencies have indicated that the categories set forth in Directive No. 15 are becoming less useful in reflecting the diversity of our Nation's population. A principal challenge is to determine what changes, if any, would be useful in the context of the Federal Government's many different needs for data on race and ethnicity, while at the same time promulgating categories and definitions that are readily understood and generally accepted by the public. During 1995, OMB continued its review of the Directive, focusing primarily on developing a research agenda and on analyzing the public comment received in response to the June 1994 Federal Register (59 FR 29831-35) notice and during the July 1994 public hearings.

Research to examine the possible effects of any proposed changes on the quality and comparability of racial and ethnic data is an important component of the OMB review process. A Research Working Group established under the auspices of OMB's Interagency Committee for the Review of the Racial and Ethnic Standards reviewed all the criticisms and suggestions for changing the current categories received in response to OMB's June 9, 1994 Federal Register (59 FR 29831-35) notice, including requests to expand the standards by establishing additional categories for specific population groups. Some of the more significant issues that were identified for research and testing are the classification of multiracial persons; combining race and Hispanic origin questions; combining concepts of race, ethnicity, and ancestry into a single question on ethnicity or race and ethnicity; and changing the names of current categories.

To provide a first vehicle for studying these issues, the Research Working Group developed the May 1995 Supplement on Race and Ethnicity to the Current Population Survey (CPS). In the CPS supplement, households were asked various forms of the racial and ethnic questions. In addition, all households were asked questions about their ancestry, preferences concerning specific terminology for racial and ethnic categories, and use of languages other than English in the home. Results of this test are expected to be available by the end of 1995.

In addition to the May 1995 CPS supplement, several other research and testing activities were planned, including the following:

On August 28, 1995, OMB published a Federal Register (60 FR 44674-93) notice that serves as an interim report on its review of Directive No. 15. The notice summarizes the public comment (including comments from Federal agencies) that resulted from the June 1994 Federal Register (59 FR 29831-35) notice and the July 1994 public hearings, and presents some information on past research findings relevant to the issues. It also sets forth proposed principles to be used in reaching a final decision on standards for the classification of data on race and ethnicity. (The issues, suggestions for change, and arguments on the issues described in the notice are those raised in public comment and do not reflect OMB positions or decisions. The notice does not contain any proposals for changing Directive No. 15.) The notice requested public comment by September 30, 1995, on additional issues, arguments on the issues, decision principles, and options for research in 1996.

During the coming year, OMB in cooperation with the Interagency Committee will continue the comprehensive review of the racial and ethnic categories to determine if changes to the categories would be useful in the context of the Federal Government's many different needs for data on race and ethnicity. Final decisions will take into account evaluations of the results from the May 1995 CPS supplement, the 1996 Race and Ethnicity Targeted Test, the 1996 National Content Survey for the 2000 decennial census, and other related research. This review process must be completed by mid-1997 so that changes, if any, in the racial and ethnic categories can be implemented in the 2000 census.

Metropolitan Areas 2000

The OMB has issued definitions of metropolitan areas for use in collecting and publishing Federal statistics since 1950. The standards for defining metropolitan areas have been reviewed and modified several times since then, but the underlying concepts have remained essentially the same over the decades.

At the request of OMB, the Census Bureau has initiated a thorough review of the concepts and methods underlying the definitions of metropolitan and alternative statistical areas. A set of four studies was commissioned to address such issues as the usefulness of classifying the entire country and measures of integration that could be used in determining the size or extent of statistical areas. A report, including the papers produced by the four studies, was prepared to serve as background for a November 1995 conference on metropolitan and related statistical areas that might be defined following the 2000 census. (Another recent publication, Metropolitan Areas 1994, documents the present definitions of metropolitan areas; it includes as well an historical review of changes in the metropolitan area definitions since they were first adopted in 1950.) The November 1995 Conference on New Approaches to Defining Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Areas was developed to present and discuss the concepts presented by the four academicians in their studies of future definitions of metropolitan classifications as well as work done on these topics by several Federal agencies: the Economic Research Service, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Bureau of the Census.

During 1996, a Federal Register notice will be prepared summarizing the views presented on various alternatives and requesting further comment on these or other proposals by metropolitan area data users and other members of the public. Based on the comments in response to this notice, preliminary proposals will be developed and made available for further comment. A revised proposal for metropolitan area standards will be published in the Federal Register in the fall of 1999 for public comment. OMB will publish the final metropolitan area standards before the 2000 census is conducted.

Supporting the Customer Service Initiative

In 1993, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs launched three initiatives in support of Executive Order 12862, Setting Customer Service Standards, to facilitate the development, review, and operation of customer surveys--a resource manual, a "generic" clearance process to support customer survey research, and a graduate-level training program in customer survey methods. Since the inauguration of these activities, many Federal professionals have taken advantage of the training opportunities offered by the Joint Program in Survey Methodology, and the Resource Manual for Customer Surveys has become a standard reference that has been reproduced and distributed, in whole or in part, by many firms in the private sector.

The streamlined "generic" clearance process established in 1993 provided opportunities for public comment on broad classes of customer surveys. In the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Congress expanded the statutory requirements for public comment. Existing data collection programs approved under the streamlined process remain in force for their normal three year term. It is anticipated that the experience gained during this three year period will permit all agencies to meet fully the requirements of the new PRA when requests to extend or revise such programs are submitted for OMB review.

Reducing Reporting Burden on Business

A multi-agency task force, chaired by the Census Bureau and including the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, currently is undertaking several initiatives that will help to streamline data collection processes and reduce the reporting burden on the business community. Examples of these efforts include the use of recently filed administrative records from the Internal Revenue Service to replace a door-to-door area survey of new and smaller businesses, and adoption of a new sampling frame to reduce and more fairly share burden for current manufacturing surveys. Activities planned for FY 1996 include obtaining receipts data from administrative records for future business register use to reduce survey samples and augment published statistics, and determining how to eliminate duplication in three separate surveys of business capital and operating expenditures that are scheduled for 1997.

In 1995, the BLS and the Census Bureau planned and began implementing a new joint electronic data collection project. Previously, the Census Bureau had confirmed the feasibility of using Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) to collect statistical information directly from business data systems in the 1992 Economic Census, and incorporated EDI as a reporting medium in the 1993 Company Organization Survey. A new joint project would extend EDI reporting to information requested for the Census Bureau's Annual Retail Trade Survey and Annual Survey of Manufactures and BLS' Current Employment Statistics Survey and Multiple Worksite Report. Businesses selected for these programs would have the option of preparing one set of EDI-formatted statistical information, transmitting it electronically to the Census Bureau and BLS, and having it used to fulfill the multiple program reporting requirements of both agencies.

Statistical Agency Heads Council

In the fall of 1988, OMB organized the Federal Council of Statistical Agency Heads. The members of this council are the heads of the principal statistical agencies, plus the heads of the statistical units in the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, and the Internal Revenue Service. This policy-level group was established to enable OMB to obtain more direct participation from the agencies in planning and coordinating Federal statistical activities. In 1995, the Congress provided an explicit legislative base for this group when it directed OMB to establish the Interagency Council on Statistical Policy in the Paperwork Reduction Act reauthorization (44 U.S.C. 3504(e)(8)). Since the members of the council have management responsibility for statistical programs in their respective agencies, their advice and cooperation is essential for effective implementation of OMB statistical policy decisions and for planning improvements in Federal statistical programs.

The council is a vehicle for coordinating statistical work, particularly when activities and issues overlap and/or cut across agencies; for exchanging information about agency programs and activities; and for providing advice and counsel to OMB in statistical matters. During 1995, agenda topics included, among others, developing legislation to permit sharing of data for statistical purposes, statistical system initiatives in the context of reinventing government, establishing performance outcomes for statistical agencies, improving access to the products of the Federal statistical system, alternatives for collecting small area data historically gathered in the decennial census long form, and activities and issues related to revising the industrial and occupational classification systems and the standards for data on race and ethnicity.

New Activities

Definition of Poverty

OMB is responsible for establishing and maintaining the U.S. statistical definition of poverty. The annual U.S. poverty income levels, or thresholds, are derived from OMB's current definition of poverty that is based on research done in the 1950's and 1960's. Although many major statistical series are revised periodically to reflect current price, consumption, and production patterns, the official poverty measure has not had a significant revision since its inception over 30 years ago.

On April 30, 1995, the National Academy of Sciences' (NAS) National Research Council released its panel report on the measurement of income and poverty, Measuring Poverty: A New Approach. The report recommends that the official U.S. poverty thresholds be changed to comprise a budget for the three basic categories of food, clothing, shelter (including utilities), and a small additional amount to allow for other needs, such as household supplies, personal care, and non-work related transportation.

The NAS report has generated serious questions about an appropriate poverty standard. Before a revision of the poverty definition can be considered, it is necessary to: (1) explore issues that the NAS report identified as involving judgement rather than science; (2) choose between an absolute and a relative poverty threshold; and (3) make sure the required data, some of which are not now available, are reliable.

In light of such issues, the Statistical Policy Office is undertaking a thorough review of the options, including the NAS proposal, before taking a position on revising the definition of poverty. To accomplish these tasks, OMB is forming a working group under the auspices of the Interagency Council on Statistical Policy to consider the statistical issues that must be addressed in the review process. The working group will coordinate closely with the Census Bureau to develop additional experimental poverty series that incorporate relevant NAS recommendations. Promising series will be published to allow analysts to examine their utility and see how they behave.

American Community Survey

At the present time, comparable local area data on the size and characteristics of the U.S. population are available only once every ten years. While national level data for certain population characteristics are available on an annual basis, most detailed data for States and localities are provided by the decennial census long form.

The proposed American Community Survey (ACS) would provide demographic and housing data annually for geographic areas with populations greater than 250,000 and would provide annually updated averages, based on the accumulation of data over a period of years, for rural areas, census tracts, and block groups. In FY 1996, the Census Bureau expects to conduct research and prepare a prototype system to demonstrate an alternative to collecting decennial census data. If successful, this program might supersede the long form that has been used in the decennial census after the 2000 census is conducted.

Redesign of the Occupational Compensation Survey Program

The surveys underlying the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Employment Cost Index (ECI) program and the Occupational Compensation Survey Program (which includes the locality pay surveys) are being redesigned into an integrated system to improve the accuracy, enhance the efficiency, and strengthen the analytical content of the index and level measures produced. In addition, the ECI index and the current weighted cost per hour compensation data are being revised and extended to incorporate new methodologies that have become available since the index was first published in 1976.

The sample design for this integrated program will be a cluster design with a sample rotational pattern that is geographic within industry group rather than the current, solely industry-based pattern. New samples will be introduced annually across every industry in every covered area, mitigating the "catch up" effect of the industry rotation pattern present in the current Employer Cost for Employee Compensation series. This new design fully integrates the "birth sample" that is appended to the current design. The single sample will produce time-series for both indexes and average compensation levels for industry and occupational groups, thereby increasing the analytical potential of the data, including improved measures of trends, better integration of benefit costs and plan provisions, data on selected compensation-determining characteristics of individual workers, and broader regional and occupational coverage. Finally, the redesign project includes an evaluation of alternative index formulas and statistical procedures that make use of the most current data available from the Bureau's Current Employment and Occupational Employment Surveys, among other sources, to better reflect current trends in the composition of the labor services employed by the civilian economy, and provide improved estimates of the accuracy of these series. These planned enhancements to the Bureau's compensation statistics, some of which already are being tested, will be implemented as quickly as the available resources permit.

Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics

Statistics on families and children are gathered by several Federal agencies, each with a different programmatic objective. In 1993, a report prepared for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) identified more than 60 major surveys and data bases that contain information about the characteristics, experiences, and behaviors of American families; the majority of these are funded by the Federal Government. A 1995 report from the National Academy of Sciences, Integrating Federal Statistics on Children, underscored the critical need for improved cross-agency planning and coordination, as well as coordination across private and public data sources. Historically, there has been little or no coordination among these efforts. Indeed, in many cases the agencies have been unaware of activities being carried out by other organizations.

In the fall of 1994, an informal working group of agency personnel recommended that a more formal mechanism be established to reduce redundancy, improve consistency, and fill gaps in statistics on families and children. Building on the successes of the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics, the new Interagency Forum on Children and Family Statistics has the mission to "foster coordination, collaboration, and integration of Federal collection of data on child and family issues and Federal reporting of child and family conditions." Agencies that are providing leadership for the forum include the Office of Management and Budget, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Center for Health Statistics, the Bureau of the Census, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (OASPE) in HHS. Representatives of these agencies will meet two or three times a year with others from within and outside government to develop general directions for the Forum's agenda, review reports from working groups carrying out more specific charges, and consider recommendations that may be addressed to one or more Federal agencies.

During 1995, the Forum created two committees to enhance coordination among agencies. The Committee on Reporting developed plans for reporting childhood indicators to the policy community and the general public. In collaboration with the Forum, OASPE will publish a report in late December entitled Trends in the Well-being of America's Children and Youth. This report will compile over 70 indicators of child well-being that have been produced in time series by the Federal statistical system. The Forum's Committee on Data Collection developed priorities for coordination to enhance data collection on children. The Committee focussed on household composition and the involvement of absent parents.

Looking ahead to 1996, the Forum will work through these two committees both to enhance the reporting of existing indicators and to improve data collection. The Forum will work closely with OASPE on its 1996 indicators report and will also consider publishing its own summary document on a smaller set of key indicators. In addition, it will work to strengthen further communication among the agencies on forthcoming studies and reports. The Forum's Committee on Data Collection will develop improved questions on household composition and parent involvement that may be added to existing surveys by all member agencies. During the coming year, the Forum will consider creating a Committee on State and Local Data to work across agencies to meet the growing challenge of producing data on children below the national level.

Improving and Integrating Health Surveys

During the past year, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has developed a health data initiative and survey integration plan designed to respond to critical data gaps and emerging data needs. The major goals of the HHS Survey Integration Plan are to implement a more rational, systematic strategy for collection of data on key health issues facing HHS; fill a critical gap by producing details that underlie annual estimates of health care expenditures, insurance coverage, and employer-related insurance costs; continue to meet public health data needs now met through ongoing population and provider-based surveys within a framework that also allows for expansion to address currently unmet public health data needs; enhance the analytic capabilities of HHS surveys by allowing multiple HHS data collection efforts to be linked analytically through the use of common core questionnaires, common sampling frames, and common definitions and terms; reduce the overall burden imposed on survey respondents by HHS below what would have been required in independent surveys to meet the same data needs; and achieve efficiencies in sampling, data collection, questionnaire design, and survey operations, thereby allowing more of HHS' resources to be focused on meeting high priority data needs.

The major elements of the HHS Survey Integration Plan are:

The President's FY 1996 budget request for HHS includes $20 million to fund enhancements to existing HHS statistical activities during the initial stages of the proposed survey improvements and integration plans.

One Stop Shopping for Federal Statistical Data

It is difficult for the general public, and even frequent data users such as social science researchers, to know about and to access the extensive array of statistical information produced by the decentralized Federal statistical system. Statistical agencies have, for the most part, made tremendous progress in developing easy access to their data and databases through the Internet, and in particular, the World Wide Web. Data users accessing information from one Federal agency may even find out about related statistics available from another agency, as a result of cross-agency links that some agencies are providing. A coordinated interagency approach is needed to provide easy access to all Federal statistics.

Under the auspices of the Interagency Council on Statistical Policy, OMB has formed a Task Force on One-Stop Service for Federal Statistical Data Users. The Task Force is primarily responsible for designing and developing easy World Wide Web access to a broad range of Federal statistics. The Task Force is also expected to obtain input from important stakeholders, including representatives from the Association of Public Data Users, the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, academic researchers, and statistical agencies not represented on the Task Force. The Task Force will develop and monitor contracts or other mechanisms to design, implement and maintain the agreed upon approach. The Task Force is also expected to take advantage of recent scientific research activities related to its mission, especially digital library research. It is anticipated that this endeavor will provide access to as much statistical information as possible without imposing user charges.

The Oregon Option

The Oregon Option is a Federal-State partnership to increase program flexibility in exchange for improving performance in meeting mutually agreed upon goals. Oregon's focus is on measuring program results for use in setting public priorities, allocating resources, and designing services. To assist in developing appropriate strategies to measure results, the Data Cluster of the Oregon Option Team was established. Members of the Data Cluster include representatives of Federal statistical agencies, relevant data producers in Oregon, and the leaders from other cluster groups. The Data Cluster works on projects that benefit both Oregon and the Federal Government, and that are useful as well to other States. Functions of the Data Cluster include: providing and developing local data to measure Statewide progress and performance; supplying technical support; coordinating statistical policy among State and Federal agencies; addressing data quality issues; and identifying barriers to the use of administrative records for statistical purposes. Activities the Oregon Option Team Data Cluster currently is supporting include the use of Oregon's Shared Information System (10 sets of matched administrative records) to improve estimates of local area characteristics, reduce data costs, and reduce respondent burden; a cooperative partnership to improve and update geographic files for surveys and Oregon's emergency telephone (911) system; exploration of the use of Oregon's administrative records in evaluations of the Survey of Income and Program Participation, in models to improve estimates from the proposed American Community Survey, and in the decennial census; and the design of a survey of crime victimization by Oregon's Criminal Justice Commission, including cooperative efforts with the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Justice Statistics to improve modelled estimates of crime victimization.


GLOSSARY OF DEPARTMENT AND AGENCY ABBREVIATIONS

ACFAdministration for Children and Families (HHS)
AHCPRAgency for Health Care Policy and Research (HHS)
AIDAgency for International Development
AoAAdministration on Aging (HHS)
ARSAgricultural Research Service (Agriculture)
ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (HHS)
BEABureau of Economic Analysis (Commerce)
BJSBureau of Justice Statistics (Justice)
BLSBureau of Labor Statistics (Labor)
BoMBureau of Mines (Interior)
BOPBureau of Prisons (Justice)
BTSBureau of Transportation Statistics (Transportation)
CDCCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS)
CensusBureau of the Census (Commerce)
CMHSCenter for Mental Health Services (HHS)
Corps EngArmy Corps of Engineers (Defense)
CP&DCommunity Planning and Development (HUD)
CPSC Consumer Product Safety Commission
CSATCenter for Substance Abuse Treatment (HHS)
CustomsUnited States Customs Service (Treasury)
DEADrug Enforcement Administration (Justice)
DMDCDefense Manpower Data Center (Defense)
DOEDepartment of Energy
EEOCEqual Employment Opportunity Commission
EIAEnergy Information Administration (Energy)
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency
ERSEconomic Research Service (Agriculture)
ESAEmployment Standards Administration (Labor)
ETAEmployment and Training Administration (Labor)
FAAFederal Aviation Administration (Transportation)
FASForeign Agricultural Service (Agriculture)
FBIFederal Bureau of Investigation (Justice)
FCSFood and Consumer Service (Agriculture) (formerly Food and Nutrition Service)
FHWAFederal Highway Administration (Transportation)
FRAFederal Railroad Administration (Transportation)
FSForest Service (Agriculture)
FTAFederal Transit Administration (Transportation)
FWSUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service (Interior)
HCFAHealth Care Financing Administration (HHS)
HHSDepartment of Health and Human Services (Agriculture)
HousingOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Housing (HUD)
HRSAHealth Resources and Services Administration (HHS)
HUDDepartment of Housing and Urban Development
IHSIndian Health Service (HHS)
INSImmigration and Naturalization Service (Justice)
IRSInternal Revenue Service (Treasury)
ITAInternational Trade Administration (Commerce)
MARADMaritime Administration (Transportation)
MMSMinerals Management Service (Interior)
MSHAMine Safety and Health Administration (Labor)
NASANational Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASSNational Agricultural Statistics Service (Agriculture)
NBSNational Biological Survey (Interior)
NCESNational Center for Education Statistics (Education)
NCHSNational Center for Health Statistics (HHS)
NCINational Cancer Institute (HHS)
NEINational Eye Institute (HHS)
NHLBINational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHS)
NHTSANational Highway Traffic Safety Administration (Transportation)
NIANational Institute on Aging (HHS)
NIAAANational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (HHS)
NIAIDNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (HHS)
NIAMSDNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (HHS)
NICHDNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHS)
NIDANational Institute on Drug Abuse (HHS)
NIDCDNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (HHS)
NIDDKNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (HHS)
NIDRNational Institute of Dental Research (HHS)
NIEHSNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (HHS)
NIHNational Institutes of Health (HHS)
NINDSNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (HHS)
NINRNational Institute of Nursing Research (HHS)
NMFSNational Marine Fisheries Service (Commerce)
NOAANational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Commerce)
NRCSNatural Resources Conservation Service (Agriculture) (formerly Soil Conservation Service)
NSF National Science Foundation
OASPEOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (HHS)
OBAOffice of Business Analysis (Commerce)
ODOffice of the Director, NIH (HHS)
OFHEOOffice of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (HUD)
OMBOffice of Management and Budget (Executive Office of the President)
OSDOffice of the Secretary of Defense, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administration (Defense)
OSETIOffice of Science, Education, and Technology Information (Energy)
OSHAOccupational Safety and Health Administration (Labor)
OSTOffice of the Secretary of Transportation (Transportation)
PD&ROffice of the Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research (HUD)
PHSPublic Health Service (HHS)
P&IHOffice of Public and Indian Housing (HUD)
Safety & HealthOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety and Health (Energy)
SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (HHS)
SBASmall Business Administration
SOIStatistics of Income Division (Treasury)
SSASocial Security Administration
USDAUnited States Department of Agriculture
USGSUnited States Geological Survey (Interior)
USTTAUnited States Travel and Tourism Administration (Commerce)
VADepartment of Veterans Affairs


Appendix

Direct Funding, Reimbursable Programs, and
Purchases, FY 1996

In millions of dollars)

Sources of Funding Purchases
Department/Agency Direct
Funding
State/
Local
Gov'ts
Private
Sector
Other
Federal
Agencies
State/
Local
Gov'ts
Private
Sector
Other
Federal
Agencies

AGRICULTURE:
ARS4.50 00 04.2 0.1
ERS54.7005.72.20.65.7
FAS30.4006.8002.1
FCS19.3000019.20.1
FS10.10.50.10.7000
NASS89.81.707.321.53.3--
NRCS90.62.402.3000

COMMERCE:
BEA51.5--0.30.2--0.11.7
Census341.41.314.7154.0--0.31.6
ITA2.4000000.4
NOAA47.80.14.32.31.63.30
OBA5.70.11.80.800.10
USTTA1.40.10.30.101.40.5

DEFENSE:
Corps Eng4.2000000.5
DMDC3.3000000
OSD2.200 000 0

EDUCATION:
NCES104.1002.42.883.710.9

ENERGY:
EIA84.7003.0040.60
OSETI0.2000000
Safety & Health29.00000024.3

HHS:
ACF22.50000.4 18.53.7
AHCPR66.50038.10.532.02.0
AoA3.100002.00
ATSDR3.5000.50.50.6--
CDC173.000.910.529.014.716.8
NCHS81.400.920.613.28.015.9
HCFA13.3001.0012.30.1
HRSA10.1000.2000.1
IHS2.700000--
NIH312.7000.4--73.99.9
OASPE22.6008.3025.65.3
SAMHSA64.90008.643.30.1

HUD:
CP&D0.2000000.2
Housing1.6000000
OFHEO2.4000000
PD&R21.700000.521.2
P&IH2.000002.00

INTERIOR:
BoM16.8000000.8
FWS7.60000.503.0
NBS2.0000000
MMS1.5000000
USGS62.352.92.549.70.30.50

JUSTICE:
BJS26.2000.53.62.515.2
BOP2.4000.5000
DEA0.8000000
FBI4.80--0000
INS11.3000.1000.1

LABOR:
BLS376.70.11.619.581.43.054.5
ESA4.40000.502.4
ETA81.500080.50.60
MSHA2.2000000
OSHA19.500003.10

TRANSPORTATION:
BTS22.0000.50011.3
FAA5.60000 1.92.8
FHWA28.7000.29.711.94.3
FRA1.500001.20.4
FTA1.500001.50
MARAD3.100000.30.2
NHTSA24.10005.012.21.6
OST0.600000--

TREASURY:
Customs7.2000000
IRS39.30.1--1.802.20.5
SOI29.40.1--1.801.00.5

VETERANS AFFAIRS
54.7000000

OTHER AGENCIES:
AID15.7000000
CPSC5.5000.70.11.30
EEOC1.000000.90
EPA136.500052.339.80.4
NASA19.3000000
NSF50.4001.1047.93.6
SBA0.60000--0.6
SSA19.90------0--
TOTAL2757.359.326.5339.8324.2521.0224.9
Note: Components may not sum to totals because of rounding. The symbol "--" indicates that the amount reported by the agency was less than $50,000.