Newsgroups: ampr.mailbox.sysop
From: dl8hbs@db0gr.nts
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 95 18:56:00 GMT
Subject: RE:German route problems????
Message-ID: <DKEXFB_DB0R@hamradio>
Path: nl0jor.nl.cbpr.org!sys2.pe1nhl!pa3ewk.ampr.org!pi8shb!pi8zaa!pi8jop!db0ovn!db0iz!db0lj!db0gv!db0fp!db0son!db0mak!db0pv!db0wgs!oe3xsr!ok0nkt!sp6kbl!ok0phl!ok0nf!ok0pkl!db0jes!db0gr!dl8hbs
Distribution: bbs.eu
BBS-Reply-To: R:951230/1856Z @:DB0GR.#BLN.DEU.EU [Berlin-BBS OP:DL7QG] DP4.09 $:DKEXFB_DB0GR
BBS-Message-ID: <DKEXFB_DB0R>
BBS-Newsgroups: SYSOP @ EU < DL8HBS
BBS-Gateway: PA3EWK PA3EWK.#NBO.NLD.EU [LBBS 0.1.6A]
Lines: 24

From: DL8HBS @ DB0GR.#BLN.DEU.EU (Joachim)
To  : SYSOP @ EU

In response to Jan-Martin, LA8AK.

Dear Jan-Martin,

just about two years ago you started the same kind of campaign concerning
dk0mnl. Should I repeat the multiple answers of sysops in europe that stated:
"better the system tells the originator that his mail couldn't be forwarded
than deleting it without a comment"?

Did you thought about that maybe a reject of the next bbs in the forwarding
chain caused the hold up? Maybe due to a filter setting deferring that useless
7PSERV-avalance following up every upload of 7plus-stuffed material?

But anyway, thank you for your polite words. How would YOU feel if being begged
to stop operation due to a heavy lack of communication standards (non-technical
ones) ?

Let's have a pceful new year,

73's from Berlin,
Joahim, DL8HBS