========== 
mail/messages #116, from jrblack@shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu, 6558 chars, 22 May 91 03:41:53 GMT 
---------- 
Received: from k30hslxsys by muse.compulink.co.uk id aa00501; 
          25 May 91 19:34 GMT 
Received: from kestrel.ukc.ac.uk by bugs.specialix.co.uk 
 id aa25104; Sat, 25 May 91 18:03:19 BST 
Received: from mcsun by kestrel.Ukc.AC.UK   via EUnet with authorised UUCP 
           id aa04300; 25 May 91 18:02 BST 
Received: from ns-mx.uiowa.edu by mcsun.EU.net with SMTP; 
 id AA13324 (5.65a/CWI-2.88); Sat, 25 May 91 18:55:53 +0200 
Received: from shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu by ns-mx.uiowa.edu (5.64.jnf/910516) 
   on Sat, 25 May 91 11:53:40 -0500 id AA09164 with SMTP  
Received: from ncar.ucar.edu by shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu (5.61.jnf/891218) 
   on Sat, 25 May 91 11:53:31 -0500 id AA28796 with SMTP  
Received: by ncar.ucar.EDU (5.65/ NCAR Central Post Office 04/10/90) 
 id AA17049; Sat, 25 May 91 10:53:28 MDT 
Received: by scicom.alphacdc.com (smail2.5) 
 id AA20057; 25 May 91 10:50:21 MDT (Sat) 
To: abdlist@shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu 
Subject: Abduction Digest 
Message-Id: <9105251050.AA20057@scicom.alphacdc.com> 
Date: 25 May 91 10:50:21 MDT (Sat) 
From: Abduction Moderator <abdmod@scicom.alphacdc.com> 
Apparently-To: tprinn 
 
  
                          Abduction Digest, Number 13 
  
                            Saturday, May 25th 1991 
  
Today's Topics: 
  
                              Re: Tesla & Tau Ceti 
                          Re: Rima Laibow (Conclusion) 
                          Re: Rima Laibow (Conclusion) 
                          Re: Rima Laibow (Conclusion) 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 
From: jrblack@shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu 
Subject: Re: Tesla & Tau Ceti 
Date: 22 May 91 03:41:53 GMT 
 
From: James Roger Black <jrblack@shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu> 
 
Why all the interest in Tau Ceti? 
 
Tau Ceti is one of the four nearby stars most commonly cited as possible 
homes for extraterrestrial life: 
 
  Name                    Spectra           Distance        Comments 
  ----                    -------           --------        -------- 
  Epsilon Eridani         K2                10.76 ly 
  61 Cygni                K5/K7/??          11.08 ly        triple star 
  Epsilon Indi            K5                11.44 ly 
  Tau Ceti                G8                11.87 ly  
 
These are the only star systems within a 16-light-year radius of earth 
that are considered likely to have habitable planets.  The others are 
thought to be either too unstable gravitationally to have planets at 
all, or are too hot, too cold, too young, too old, too whatever to 
provide a stable environment for life to develop and to survive long 
enough for it to achieve intelligence.  Tau Ceti is considered the best 
candidate, since it is the most like our own sun. 
 
Of course, even 'uninhabitable' planets could be colonized by high-tech 
immigrants from somewhere else; and in any case the parameters of 
'official' opinion in this area change year by year.  For example, it 
was long thought impossible for multiple-star systems such as Alpha 
Centauri and 61 Cygni to have stable planetary orbits within the 
habitable zones, but computer simulations have questioned that 
conclusion. 
 
One reason these four are attractive is that they all lie approximately 
11 light years from earth.  Apparently the first major UFO waves took 
place some 22-24 years after the first high-power radio transmissions 
from earth which could have been detected at interstellar distances. 
Such transmissions, moving at the speed of light, would have taken 
about 11 years to reach them, and spacecraft moving at near-light speed 
would have taken not much more than that to return here--hence the 22-24 
year time frame. 
 
Of course, that's assuming that 'they' are in fact extra-terrestrials, 
which is far from proven.  Jacques Vallee, Gordon Creighton, and others 
have suggested that the so-called 'aliens' are in fact as closely bound 
to this planet as we are, in which case Tau Ceti is utterly 
irrelevant. 
 
Or, maybe, both theories are right ... 
 
 
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 
From: Paul.Carr@f4.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Paul Carr) 
Subject: Re: Rima Laibow (Conclusion) 
Date: 19 May 91 20:19:00 GMT 
 
One very interesting aspect of the Rima Laibow paper is that 
it describes a semi-repeatable experiment - Having a psychiatrist 
test several abductess, attempting to deduce if they have anything in  
common.  A control group of non-abductees (or perhaps several such 
groups) would be needed to establish the validity of the results. 
Let CSICOP's Psychologists (Robert A. Baker, Irving Biederman, 
Susan Blackmore, Milton Rosenberg, and B.F. Skinner) pick the 
psychiatrists to perform the examinations. 
--   
Paul Carr - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name 
INTERNET: Paul.Carr@f4.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG 
 
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 
From: Jim.Speiser@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Speiser) 
Subject: Re: Rima Laibow (Conclusion) 
Date: 20 May 91 06:48:00 GMT 
 
Paul: 
 
On the subject of Robert Baker, are you aware of a book of his entitled  
"They Call It Hypnosis"? (presumably Prometheus). I have been told that in  
it he speaks of a study of 300 abductees, in which it was discovered that a  
large majority of them, on the order of 80-90%, suffered from Fantasy-Prone  
Personality. I'm asking because this information not only came as a shock to  
me, but to several other "professionals" I've conversed with. One of them  
assured me that the only people who have ever worked with such a large group  
were Budd Hopkins and, indirectly, Eddie Bullard. If you, or anyone  
watching, is aware of this book or the aforementioned study, please speak  
up. Abductees everywhere are waiting with baited breath! 
 
Jim  
  
--   
Jim Speiser - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name 
INTERNET: Jim.Speiser@paranet.FIDONET.ORG 
 
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 
From: Paul.Carr@f4.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Paul Carr) 
Subject: Re: Rima Laibow (Conclusion) 
Date: 21 May 91 19:11:00 GMT 
 
Did Dr. Baker work with a control group?  And where did he get 300 
abductees?  Put an ad in the National Enquirer? 
--   
Paul Carr - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name 
INTERNET: Paul.Carr@f4.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG 
 
 
 
****************A**B**D**U**C**T**I**O**N****D**I**G**E**S**T******************* 
 
Submissions UUCP  {ncar,isis,boulder}!scicom!abduct 
Submissions DOMAIN  abduct@scicom.alphacdc.com 
Admin Address   abduct-request@shemtaia.weeg.uiowa.edu 
  
****************A**B**D**U**C**T**I**O**N****D**I**G**E**S**T******************* 
 
 
