±b3 DISKMAGAZINE× ±b3 REVIEWS× ±32By Dolphin/Stone Arts× A total of four diskmags have been reviewed this time: ±12 Upstream #8 from Balance ±13 Compass #1 from Alcatraz ±12 Propaganda #3 from Razor 1911 ±13 Buzz #2 from Defiance ±41These are the only diskmags I've received in the last couple of months (++). If you want your own diskmag to be reviewed in Headline, then send it! ±b2 UPSTREAM VIII× ±21Publishing group...............±23Balance ±21Main editors....±23Cesium, Wolfman, Mount ª32±41 Although most the scene seem to think that Upstream is one of the two best diskmags right now, after reading trough this issue, people are bound to change their opinion! The eighth issue is after normal standards quite good, but not±42 THAT±41 good. The average quality of the articles makes a good impression. The design is what Upstream lacks most of. To put it in other words: Upstream is in desperate need of better design! The standard two blue colours they use in the articles, combined with the also blue menu panel looks quite simply disgusting. The music, which is conducted by Lizardking, is o.k, but gets boring after reading approximately 10 minutes. - Not something suitable to listen to when reading a mag. Unfortunately, Upstream is bugged like hell. Anytime you chose to load another module, to save an article or to exit(±43!±41) - you'll see that irritating guru! (This only happened on my disk version, though! - On my harddisk it worked properly.) The intro included on the disk containing Upstream #8 could and should have been left out... It lacks of design, ideas and graphics. I don't think that this is the best issue of Upstream so far. Try to be better next time! ±b2 COMPASS I× ±21Publishing group..............±23Alcatraz ±21Main editors...............±23Disney, Mop ª22±41 The team responsible for the late McDisk seem to have made a new diskmagazine. The design is very nice with a simple, yet well drawn menupanel. The colours are also well chosen. The articles which basicly are written by Mop are well written, but perhaps slightly boring. The subjects brought up are original, but not suitable for the masses, sort of speak. The design and the code of Compass balances one a fine line between a rip-off of the late Zine's 11th issue and a mere source of inspiration from the mentioned diskmagazine. Compass seems to be one of the best newcomers in the diskmag scene, and with the hardworking maineditors responsible for most of the articles - it can most certainly be expected to last. ±b2 PROPAGANDA III× ±21Publishing group............±23Razor 1911 ±21Main editor..................±23Colorbird ª42±41 Propaganda is quite a good name for a diskmag, possibly even the best name since Zine. But the name itself isn't enough to make a classic. This diskmagazine lacks quality in several important places. The majority of the articles concern the standard diskmag subjects such as "elite v.s lame" and "stamp-faking". This is actually quite unoriginal and makes the impression that much worse. In addition there are far too many short articles with 1-2 columns. The menu-panel looks awful, and while watching it you get the distinguished feeling that it's unfinished. A thing that really pisses me of is the poor variation of fonts. Only one font, siesta 8, which is - along with good old topaz - among the most boring fonts available. The design and layout of the various articles is practicly nonexisting. The only tune included is made by Strobo/Stellar and is ±43 quite±41 nice. Given the fact that this is the third issue, the quality should have been of a higher standard. If the producers are aiming for the top-5 diskmagazines, as they claim(!), the whole concept needs to be re-concidered. Both the design and the general quality of the articles must be improved in order to be more than average. Note to colorbird: You need to sit down and think over what you can offer the readers which other existing diskmag don't! ±b2 BUZZ II× ±21Publishing group..............±23Defiance ±21Main editor...................±23Plugster ª62±41 I've never seen the first issue of Buzz, but it seems that I haven't missed out on anything. Why? Buzz is quite frankly the most ugly, non-user-friendly diskmagazine I've ever had the misfortune to come across. Most important, the articles are utterly boring and the english is very bad. The design is ancient! If Buzz had been released 4-5 years ago, people wouldn't have been impressed then either. The concept is based on a swapper-advertisements diskmagazine, at least it seems so, because nobody can amuse themselves with it. My advice to Defiance is to ±42quit±41 Buzz! ç