|The TV Portrait of Computers - Continued by Freak of NFA I typed this little one to follow on from what Keˇ was saying, but on a slightly different note, with a few corrections, and some debatable bits too so YOU can write in... I don't think it's the problem of Actors and Script-Writers being out of touch, although admittedly it does happen. I think the reason that THAT specific episode of The Bill seemed crap to us sceners is that we are all familiar with the terminology, whereas those watching the programme are not necessarily going to be bang up-to-date on their scene lingo. We thought it crap but you've got to remember that it asn't actually MADE specifically for US, you have to take into account the fact that Britain is slow to take new ideas onboard, it's one of the things that makes Britain great (some call it "tradition") but at times it can be a bloody frustrating thing indeed! The kid in the episode was not killed simply because of what he was doing, i.e. cracking and selling games (Funny, but he must also have had a CD-Pressing machine to do some of tht stuff!), he was killed because he let his computer work HIM instead of the other way round, became the sort of chap we'd call "a right little shit", and the guy selling the stuff for him just lost his temper. Unfortunately The Bill's script- writers implied that the computers were solely to blame, which (getting nicely back to Keˇ's article) is rediculous. A similar situation exists in books, as I pointed out to Phil!/Neř a while ago. Dean Koonz (for example) insists on calling a disk a "floppy diskette" and a drive a "floppy drive". While these names are indeed very exact and perfectly correct, the are hardly the cutting edge of technology and so their more modern "slang" names should be used. For another example, not everybody calls an Optical Drive a "floptical" as they've not got used to the idea of them yet, and so (for the moment!) the term "Optical Drive" would be perfectly acceptable in an episode of "The Bill". To get back to that episode, you could rewrite several of the lines in more modern terminology thus: "Is he on any Bulletin boards?" -> "Is he on any BBS's" "Is he on any Boards?" But of course not everybody would know what the hell you were on about and the episode would probably take a nose-dive in the eyes of umpteem million viewers as opposed to one million Amiga owners, you go for the hightest rating group in TV! Incidently, I couldn't help noticing that the kid helping the police was asked "Where would he keep the importnt stuff?" and replied "On the PC" - despite the fact that there were at least three of them... I mean come ON! How many 15-yr old kids do YOU know who: a) Can Crack a Game? b) Can reproduce the exact packaging of a commercial Product without arousing anybody's suspicions? c) Have THREE PC's in their bedroom? d) Manage ALL of the above and STILL keep their mum from going into their bedroom? Do you remember the program (I forget what it was called) on C4 about the hackers who were buated and what have you? THEIR room was a spare room in a house, wall-to-wall Amiga's (just like NFA-WHQ!), grubby disks piled high, and MORE IMPORTANTLY - Empty packing boxes that usually come wrapped round 500 blank disks, the very same ones I used to have kicking around because Sceners rarely throw stuff out! Perhaps The Bill should have taked a closer look at that doccy... But we digress, the point is that TV Producers and Writers alike are not in sufficient touch with the tiny worlds that they're trying to bring into their work in order to portray them successfully. The other point in Keˇ's article is that of the TV and media only showing us (Or rather Joe P. Ublic) the shadey uses of computers. This all boils down to viewing figures again, after all who would watch a documentary about how Flower Arranging is made easier using computers of how a Leisure Centre keeps track of everything using a computer? These are (well, I'm not sure about the flowers ;-) real uses for computers but the point is that they're not sensationalistic enough to grab the interest of the public at large, and so the TV & Media ignore them. How about a Bill episode in which a gang or Car Theives/Strippers is caught because parts from a dodgy vehicle (a cut-n-shut perhaps?) were traced using a revolutionary new Country-Wide database that takes the data from all the Police Forces and cross-references it with the pooter at the DVLC? It's plausible but they won't touch it simply because it won't generate sufficiant interest, sad really! Yes, I'd like to see a programme dedicated to the fun use of computers as well, and not just some tosh like Lamesmaster or Sad Influence. Demos are an art form, we have Top of the pops so why not a computer version of the same thing? Imagine if a 1-hour program was split into three 20-minute sections, one each for PC, Amiga, and everything else! Can you imagine how the sales of Amigas would go if people saw just what the machine could DO? Link it with a good PD-House (17-Bit?) so that people could actually BUY the stuff as well, and you'd have a top-rated TV show! I've seen PC demos, they're poo... Trust me. It's sad that people are only interested when it's the bad stuff that's being portrayed on the screen or in the pages, and I think it's kind of indicative of the decline in morals and intellect of the population. If people didn't watch/read cack then nobody would produce it, mind you, we all thought that about computer games...