SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Date: 8 March 1995 Department 103 Hon. Lance A. Ito Deirdre Robertson, Deputy Clerk People v. Orenthal James Simpson Case # BA097211 ================================================================ DISCOVERY ORDER The Court has read and considered the Defendant's MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF PEACE OFFICER'S PERSONNEL FILE, the LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION RE DISCOVERY OF POLICE OFFICER PERSONNEL RECORDS; REQUEST FOR IN CAMERA INTERVIEW, heard the argument of counsel, including counsel for the officer whose records are sought, and has conducted an in camera review of the records produced by the custodian of records of the Los Angeles Police Department. Defendant, by way of a renewed /FN1/ "Pitchess" motion, /FN2/ seeks discovery of personnel and departmental records relating to three additional incidents or allegations: 1. An Internal Affairs Division investigation of allegations that the subject officer planted evidence, which includes interviews of at least 14 officers who were present at the crime scene on Bundy Avenue. 2. Possession by the subject officer of a swastika or other Nazi Style symbol. 3. The subject made comments regarding intimate parts of Nicole Brown Simpson's anatomy indicating a prior undisclosed relationship. The Court Finds and orders as follows: 1. The Los Angeles Police Department shall disclose the interviews of the officers at the Bundy Avenue crime scene. 2. The court finds no relevance to the swastika allegations and the alleged incident to be well beyond the time limits of Evidence Code Section 1045 (b)(1). /FN3/ 3. The Los Angeles Police Department shall disclose the statements of DDA Ellen Burke, DDA Lucienne Coleman, Detective Daryl Maxwell and Detective Mark Arneson, each redacted to reflect only the investigation into those statements rumored to have been made by the subject officer regarding Nicole Brown Simpson's breast augmentation. The custodian of records is to provide the redacted statements to the court for its inspection, comparison and approval. The court will then provide one copy to each side. 4. No copies of the statements referred to in item 3 directly above shall be made, nor shall the contents be shared with any person not directly involved in the prosecution and defense of this case. Said court provided copies shall be returned to the court upon the conclusion of the case. IT IS SO ORDERED.