[SF5S][SC1S][SK2S]EDITORS' CHARTS
 [SF2S][SC0S][SK1S] 
Is it necessary and really indispensable?

    Many editors acknowledge charts as a few original idea, superfluous filling so much space. The idea is more profound than it seems to you. Would you like to read a critique of your mag in some magazine that your mag is poor, because has only xx kilobytes? Do you want to allow to be estimated at first right, especially on the ground of number texts in mag? I can't allow to that. I'll do everything to insert this article in Gedan #3 and next numbers. Editor's charts is a kind of encouragement. Then you can distinguish. And it is worthy to know who works hard and who's idle. You can say: "OK, but somebody can make a shit to be as good as it's possible". Yes, but what selection is for?

    The article should be put in every mag by reason of that everone likes to see whather some of his article, maybe he found time to write texts and maybe he didn't leave scene, but only stopped to be a swapper.
 [SF6S][SC1S][SK3S] 
MR.WOLF OF INQUISITION
 [SF3S][SC0S][SK1S] 
The Knight: I must admit that I decided to resign editors' charts from Gedan #2, because I didn't feel like count all kilobytes of text, all authors etc. But Mr.Wolf announced me, plainly black mailed, that he will worry me until there won't be charts. Looking at Mr.Wolf I decided to prepare charts to all Gedans. You won Mr.Wolf! I'd like to mention about some detail - sometimes I like to add a little postscript to someone's article (like here) it grows and it gets on the author's account. I didn't become insane that to substract all my fragments. That's all.
 [SC1S] 
Translating by Paweî Sîomczyński
 [SC0S]