*:MSGHDR_1
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 4969; Fri,
 04 May 90 01:50:34 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 2761; Fri, 04 May 90 01:49:51 O
Date:         Thu, 3 May 90 14:25:44 EDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         Tom J Hayko <tjhayko@THUNDER.LAKEHEADU.CA>
Subject:      AmigaWorld
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

I thought I should post this, since I said I would, so here goes.

begin quote


IDG Communications/Peterborough, Inc.
80 Elm St.
Peterborough, NH
03458

Dear Publisher,

     I am writing after a  particularly  annoying  incident  with
your customer service department.
     First, being a caller from outside your 800 number  zone,  I
attempted  to  place  a  collect  call  to  your customer service
department.  I was informed that you do not accept collect  calls
and  that  I  would  have to dial direct to your customer service
department, at my own expense, and was not even given  the  phone
number.   Surely,  a  magazine that is attempting to represent an
international machine such as the  Amiga  should  accept  collect
calls  from  it's subscribers to the customer service department,
or at the  very least, give out the phone  number!   After  going
through  my  old  phone  bills  to determine the customer service
phone number (I had the misfortune to have to deal with them four
times  previously),  I  called  you  customer service department.
After inquiring why it was taking 6 to 8 weeks from the date that
AmigaWorld  appeared on the newstands until I received a particu-
lar issue, I was told that my subscription had  not  begun  until
February. Previously, when I called your customer service depart-
ment approximately one month after my subscription card had  been
mailed,  I  was  told  that  my subscription would begin with the
January issue.  Second, I was told that payment for my  subscrip-
tion had not been made until April.  A payment was made, by Visa,
as soon as a statement of the account was received from your com-
pany.   If  a  statement  was not received until April, the fault
lies with your company, not with myself.  I addition to  this,  I
was  told  that the address that the magazine was being delivered
to had been changed four times.  I moved once.   The  reason  for
the  four  address  changes  is  each successive time I contacted
your customer service department, I was told that the address had
not  yet  been  changed.   Finally, I stated that I would like to
cancel my subscription.  The  customer  service  representive  (I
didn't get her name), questioned why I was canceling my subscrip-
tion.  I stated that I was tired of waiting six to eight weeks to
receive  magazines  that I had already paid for.  She again asked
me why I wanted to cancel my subscription.  I stated again that I
was tired of waiting to receive magazines that I had already paid
for.  She iagain  asked me why I wanted to  cancel  my  subscrip-
tion.  I then stated that I was tired of hearing the excuses from
your company and that I would like to please cancel my  subscrip-
tion.   Your customer service representive then hung up on me.  I
immediately called back and was connected to another,  (thankful-
ly)  more  polite  customer  service representive who canceled my
subscription and told me that I would be receiving a full  refund
of my subscription price.
    Copies of this letter  and  your  reply  will  be  posted  to
USENET.
    I would like a written apology for the rude behavior of  your
customer  service representives, including an answer to my origi-
nal question as to the difference in time  between  the  magazine
appearing  on the newstand and the time a subscriber receives the
magazine, better customer service and a  complimentary  subscrip-
tion.

Sincerely,

Tom Hayko


end of quote
**********************************************************
* Tom Hayko                    * only the Amiga      /// *
* tjhayko@thunder.lakeheadu.ca * (if only Commodore ///  *
* tjhayko@LUSUN.BITNET         *   knew that)   \\\///   *
* tjhayko@LAKEHEAD.BITNET      *                 \XX/    *
**********************************************************
*:MSGHDR_2
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 4974; Fri,
 04 May 90 01:58:33 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 2852; Fri, 04 May 90 01:59:13 O
Date:         Thu, 3 May 90 21:05:54 BST
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
From:         WEEKSJH@KIRK.VAX.ASTON.AC.UK
Subject:      SignOff PLEASE
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

Please sign me off the list.

I know I should be telling the list server and not the list, but I've tried
 every possible sign-off message, and it keeps on telling me I haven't
 subscribed, despite sending me loads of mail.
*:MSGHDR_3
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5024; Fri,
 04 May 90 04:45:51 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 4031; Fri, 04 May 90 04:46:36 O
Date:         Thu, 3 May 90 16:32:48 CDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         Dan Shipley <S092592@UMRVMA>
Subject:      Comp.sys.amiga
X-To:         sub@UMRVMA, Comp.sys.amiga@UMRVMA
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

I would like to subscribe to Comp.sys.amiga and Comp.sys.amiga.tech.  If
anyone can tell me how to do this, I would be grateful.

Thanks in advance ...

Dan
*:MSGHDR_4
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5029; Fri,
 04 May 90 04:51:17 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 4067; Fri, 04 May 90 04:51:56 O
Date:         Thu, 3 May 90 16:26:56 -0400
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was barrett@CRABCAKE.CS.JHU.EDU
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         Dan Barrett <barrett%crabcake@CRABCAKE.CS.JHU.EDU>
Subject:      amiga floppies
X-To:         i-amiga@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

"Amanda C. Lee" <ALEE%MSSTATE.BITNET@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu> writes
>why are amiga drives so slow.   I have had an amiga ever since the 1000
>came out, and I thought there would be an improvement eventually.
>the thing is, I don't think they are that bad, except for directory listings
>and such.

	Actually, the Amiga drives themselves (mechanical) are not slow.
Rather, the filesystem is optimized for certain things and not for others.

	The Amiga file system is EXTREMELY fast at finding a particular
named file.  If you have a huge directory and say:

	1> type foo

the file "foo" is found very quickly.

	However, the file system is extremely slow at moving through a
directory.  That's why commands like:

	1> dir

are so slow.

	The advantage of the Amiga file system is that it will be able to
find named files fast, no matter how many files you have on your disk.
A system like the IBM PC's (MS-DOS) does quick directory listings, but the
speed to access a particular file slows down a lot as the disk fills up.

	No matter what you do, you get a tradeoff.  The Amiga filesystem
was designed to be extremely efficient on a hard drive, but it is very
lousy for certain floppy operations.

                                                        Dan

 //////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
| Dan Barrett     -      Systems Administrator, Computer Science Department |
| The Johns Hopkins University, 34th and Charles Sts., Baltimore, MD  21218 |
| INTERNET:   barrett@cs.jhu.edu           |                                |
| COMPUSERVE: >internet:barrett@cs.jhu.edu | UUCP:   barrett@jhunix.UUCP    |
 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////////////////////////
*:MSGHDR_5
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5070; Fri,
 04 May 90 09:24:02 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 6692; Fri, 04 May 90 09:24:36 O
Date:         Fri, 4 May 90 01:16:00 CDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         MARTIN%TIGGER.DECNET@MSUS1
Subject:      Amiga System for sale.....
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

I am looking to sell my amiga 2000 system, it includes:

Amiga 2000 w/ Super Agnes and 1MB
2 3.5" floppy drives
1 Segate 296N 80MB HD w/ Trumpcard controller (works w/Amax)
Amax w/128K ROMs and Mac Drive (Cutting Edge 800K)
Future Sound Digitizer
Gravis Joystick
1084Sd RGB Monitor
Lots and Lots of software.....
all cables, and any necessary extras.

I would like any offers that are reasonable....
Send to:
MARTIN%TIGGER.DECNET@MSUS1.BITNET
or if you can't send there put it on the net......

NOTE:  THIS ENTIRE SYSTEM IS LESS THAN 6 MONTHS OLD!!! The HD is only 2 months
          old.......

Jim Martin
*:MSGHDR_6
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5072; Fri,
 04 May 90 09:30:03 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 6816; Fri, 04 May 90 09:30:44 O
Date:         Thu, 3 May 90 12:48:00 U
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
From:         CSHUYEB@NTIVAX
Subject:      Amiga
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>


Just like to know more about Amiga 300...

*:MSGHDR_7
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5078; Fri,
 04 May 90 11:35:32 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 8071; Fri, 04 May 90 11:31:53 O
Date:         Fri, 4 May 90 11:35:46 EET
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
From:         mea@MEA.UTU.FI
Subject:      Re: Problems on unsub...
X-cc:         weeksjh@kirk.vax.aston.ac.UK
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  <9005040915.AA05953@mea.utu.fi>; from
              "WEEKSJH@KIRK.VAX.ASTON.AC.UK" at May 3, 90 9:05 pm

Jonny Weeks had a problem:

> Please sign me off the list.
>
> I know I should be telling the list server and not the list, but I've tried
>  every possible sign-off message, and it keeps on telling me I haven't
>  subscribed, despite sending me loads of mail.

This is quite simple thing.
When Jonny had made his subscription, his system had given its address
as (Internet style)  KIRK.ASTON.AC.UK.  Now it gave  KIRK.VAX.ASTON.AC.UK.

  They are NOT the same.  (For LISTSERV anyway.)

I did help him out anyway.

Everybody:  If your system now gives different address for your mails
than what is your current subscription address (It may be visible on
your mail headers in 'To:' field), you are in trouble --
unless you have 'multi-faced' system (BITNET + Internet + Decnet + ...)
which all may have different outbound names.

  You know, my IBM account is either  FYS-MA@FINTUVM (+ .BITNET) or
FYS-MA@MAMMUTTI.UTU.FI / FYS-MA@FINTUVM.UTU.FI

When I use TELL (Jnet: SEND) to inform LISTSERVs, address is plain FINTUVM.
When I send mail, it can be any of those three - my choise - default being
FYS-MA@MAMMUTTI.UTU.FI.

        /Matti Aarnio   <mea@mea.utu.fi>
                        <mea@funic.funet.fi>
                        Span/Hepnet:  21905::kontu::mea
                        <fys-ma@fintuvm.bitnet>
        FUNIC:  Finnish Academic and Research Network Project
                Network Information/Software Archival Service
        OH1MQK - Radio Amateurs do it in Super High Frequency (10GHz)

*:MSGHDR_8
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5230; Sat,
 05 May 90 00:34:58 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 5352; Sat, 05 May 90 00:35:44 O
Date:         Fri, 4 May 90 14:42:25 MEZ
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
From:         Karsten Klemm +49 0511 532-4269 <OMER@DHVMHH1>
Subject:      Fish List Avaiable ?
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

Hi all

Two questions:

first, is there Fred Fish PD between 321 and 340 available per FTP
over FINTUVM ?
and second... are new Fish Disks ( over 340 ) available and can
anybody send me an Index from Fish PD over 340 ?

thanx in advance
Karsten
*:MSGHDR_9
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5232; Sat,
 05 May 90 00:35:32 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 5372; Sat, 05 May 90 00:36:07 O
Date:         Fri, 4 May 90 14:13:08 BST
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
From:         WILLETTSAC@KIRK.VAX.ASTON.AC.UK
Subject:      Comp.sys.amiga.tech address
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>


Before I type the address, let me just warn you that you can read this list,
but please, please, please, kepp any enquiries to the list very technical.
there have been flames recently regarding the general downfall in the quality
of postings there. It is STRICTLY a technical list, if it keeps getting worse
then CBM people won't have time to wade thru all the garbage to find the
genuine problems.  It's a great list, very 'educational' reading for
programmers, subscribe and read at will, just don't post to it unless it's
absolutely essential.
By the way, I know that a lot of you will have the sense to keep postings
to CSAT technical, but this is just an attempt to keep the standard up, if
I'm going to post the subscription address, I don't want to be held
responsible for more garbage appearing there.
Ok, here's the address, it's a BITNET one, from here (JANET) anyway.

  LISTSERV@DHDURZ1

there, simple, eh?

either send a
 tell LISTSERV@DHDURZ1 sub csamiga Your_Name
or send a
 sub csamiga Your_Name

to the subscription address (This is how VMS users would do it)

 Have fun,
   Andy
*:MSGHDR_10
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5300; Sat,
 05 May 90 04:21:51 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 7810; Sat, 05 May 90 04:22:34 O
Date:         Fri, 4 May 90 14:05:50 -0500
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         "Jeffrey R. Allegrezza" <jra1@RA.MSSTATE.EDU>
Subject:      internet newsgroups
X-To:         i-amiga%rutvm1@cornellc.cit.cornell.edu
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

Ahhh. I have finally gotten an internet account, and I was wondering if
someone could send me a list of internet news groups.  especially the
amiga ones.

jra1@RA.msstate.edu
or, if you want to irritate me
alee@msstate.bitnet

thanks
*:MSGHDR_11
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5306; Sat,
 05 May 90 04:33:14 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 8040; Sat, 05 May 90 04:33:32 O
Date:         Fri, 4 May 90 11:42:00 CDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         "Mark Gooderum - Univ. of Kansas ACS" <MARKV@UKANVAX>
Subject:      Re: amiga floppies
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

> why are amiga drives so slow.   I have had an amiga ever since the 1000
> came out, and I thought there would be an improvement eventually.
> the thing is, I don't think they are that bad, except for directory listings
> and such.
>
> any ideas?

Actually the Answer is pretty simple.  The Amiga file system scatters
header blocks for both files and directories accross the disk
according to a hash function.  This makes accessing a particular file
very fast (you just has to that block, and put put with just one or
two collisions), but makes directories very slow (since you have to
jump all over the disk to read in the directory headers).  Workbench
is even worse since it has to indvidually access each .info file too.

BAD (a program I dont have, but want to get) is a commercial optimizer
that fixes this by clustering directory blocks on the root track and
(optionally) clustering the .info files togather for each directory.
Also, with OFS, you have the overhead of stripping out the DOS header
information from each data block (34 bytes).

FFS on floppies is a bit better and with 2.0 will be officailly
supported.  (Although with 1.3 its easy with a little program called
AutoDiskChange).

> ps. check out the mars bbs. it is at 130.18.64.3
> we have a steadily growing amount of software on board.
> mars is also open to anonm[Dymous ftp, by the way.

Does mars have a Domain name yet?

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark Gooderum                   Only...         \    Good Cheer !!!
Academic Computing Services            ///        \___________________________
University of Kansas                 ///  /|         __    _
Bix:      markgood            \\\  ///  /__| |\/| | | _   /_\  makes it
Bitnet:   MARKV@UKANVAX         \/\/  /    | |  | | |__| /   \ possible...
Internet: markv@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*:MSGHDR_12
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5343; Sat,
 05 May 90 09:06:06 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 9133; Sat, 05 May 90 09:06:49 O
Date:         Fri, 4 May 90 17:44:00 EST
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         D_BLEZARD@UNHH
Subject:      RE: A3000 Student Discount
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

     Here's the basics once again on the Commodore Student Dicounts:

        1.  All certified schools, teachers at such schools, and ONLY
post-secondary students qualify.
        2.  The necessary forms and current price list are available only
through your local dealers.  Contact C= if you need to find one.
        3.  The discounts are from 45% to 50% on packaged systems.  Separate
components are at 40% off and must be purchased with a CPU (unless the
component deal has been extended again.)
        4.  Payment is upfront in cash or certified check, only one purchase
per year, and lots of other assorted legalese.

     And now for the rumors:  I heard a few days ago from the local dealer that
the A3000 will be available on the discount plan at the same savings.  A
hypothesized system of an A3000/16 and a multisync monitor should be right
around $2000.  Definitely not bad.

BCNU,

 / \
(   )
 /_\  Acer

David Blezard             //
d_blezard@unhh.bitnet   \X/
*:MSGHDR_13
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5345; Sat,
 05 May 90 09:06:37 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 9150; Sat, 05 May 90 09:07:26 O
Date:         Sat, 5 May 90 13:35:13 SST
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         "S. Sujarittanonta" <AKISUJAR@NUSVM>
Subject:      A-MAX VERSION 2
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

Hello from Singapore,

Has any one know if the A-Max Mac emulator version 2 is available yet?
and whether this new version 2 supports the hard disk.

Thanks,  Suthipuntha.  School of Architecture,
                       National University of Singapore
                       AKISUJAR@NUSVM.BITNET
*:MSGHDR_14
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5347; Sat,
 05 May 90 09:10:01 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 9178; Sat, 05 May 90 09:10:32 O
Date:         Tue, 1 May 90 11:45:57 EDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         Martin Gemmel <mgemmel@CS.VU.NL>
Subject:      I would like a newer A68k and ZC...
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

Is there a newer version of the Amiga port of ZC, the Sozobon
C compiler, than version 1.01, Dec-88? If so, could someone
please mail it to me?
And, is there a newer version of A68k, than V2.42, Jan-89? If so,
could someone please mail it to me?

Thanks in advance...
*:MSGHDR_15
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5352; Sat,
 05 May 90 09:11:02 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 9205; Sat, 05 May 90 09:11:35 O
Date:         Wed, 2 May 90 02:39:27 EDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         Gustavo Cordova <al158305@MTECV2.MTY.ITESM.MX>
Subject:      Re: I would like a newer A68k and ZC...
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  mgemmel@cs.vu.nl's message of 1 May 90 15:45:57 GMT

In article <6416@star.cs.vu.nl> mgemmel@cs.vu.nl (Martin Gemmel) writes:

> Is there a newer version of the Amiga port of ZC, the Sozobon
> C compiler, than version 1.01, Dec-88? If so, could someone
> please mail it to me?
> And, is there a newer version of A68k, than V2.42, Jan-89? If so,
> could someone please mail it to me?

> Thanks in advance...

or, better yet, inform the list where we can get them if they're ftp-able..

/======================================================\
|                  Gustavo Cordova                     |
|             al158305 @ mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx           |
|             al158305 @ 131.178.1.5                   |
|             bl158305 @ tecmtyvm.bitnet               |
\======================================================/
--
Gustavo Cordova
al158305@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx
pl158305@tecmtyvm.bitnet

disclaimer: These are my opinions, it you don't like'em, just kill'em.
*:MSGHDR_16
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5450; Sat,
 05 May 90 16:37:44 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 1525; Sat, 05 May 90 16:38:12 O
Date:         Sat, 5 May 90 02:34:29 EDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         Pietro Vago <EK094C@GWUVM>
Subject:      Re: AmigaWorld
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  Message of Thu,
              3 May 90 14:25:44 EDT from <tjhayko@THUNDER.LAKEHEADU.CA>

Dear Tom;
I think the answer is only one: you are a


GGGGG EEEEE EEEEE K   K  !
G     E     E     K  K   !
G  GG EEE   EEE   KKK    !
G   G E     E     K  K   !
GGGGG EEEEE EEEEE K   K  !

Sincerely yours, Pietro Vago.
*:MSGHDR_17
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5456; Sat,
 05 May 90 17:27:01 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 2283; Sat, 05 May 90 17:27:46 O
Date:         Sat, 5 May 90 12:22:59 ADT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     <05MAY90.13381673.0033.MUSIC@UNB.CA>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         "Troy Morehouse <MOREHOUS@UNB.CA>" <MOREHOUS@UNB.CA>
Subject:      Re: Amiga World
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

I too have had problems with the magazine. I always seem to get my copy
of Amiga World one or two weeks after it hits the newsstands. With other
magazines that I have subscribed to, I have always recieved my copy two
weeks before the news stands get it. Something does not seem right here.
Once I recieved the May issue of Amiga World before I got the April
issue!

Troy.

P.S. These are my opinions and do not necesarily reflect those of the
     rest of the world.
*:MSGHDR_18
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5482; Sat,
 05 May 90 23:20:02 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 3715; Sat, 05 May 90 23:20:39 O
Date:         Sat, 5 May 90 11:47:40 EDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         Ed Champ <JBUSELME@SBCCVM>
Subject:      Re: Amiga World
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  Message of Sat, 5 May 90 12:22:59 ADT from <MOREHOUS@UNB.CA>

I have subscribed to Amiga World for 2 years and have never had a problem
with them.  Maybe you should look into why it gets delayed sometimes.

Perhaps the USPS is at fault (especially when you got May before April).
*:MSGHDR_19
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5512; Sun,
 06 May 90 12:25:21 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 6573; Sun, 06 May 90 12:26:10 O
Date:         Sun, 6 May 90 00:29:00 CST
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         DA3721A@DRAKE
Subject:      DECWindows
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

Does anyone know of an implementation of DECWindows for the Amiga? Please tell
me if there is one available somewhere.

                        Thanks,
                        David Aschbrenner
                        DA3721A@DRAKE
                        Drake University
                        Des Moines, IA
*:MSGHDR_20
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5538; Sun,
 06 May 90 19:44:16 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 7842; Sun, 06 May 90 19:44:49 O
Date:         Wed, 2 May 90 02:39:27 EDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         Gustavo Cordova <al158305@MTECV2.MTY.ITESM.MX>
Subject:      Re: I would like a newer A68k and ZC...
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  mgemmel@cs.vu.nl's message of 1 May 90 15:45:57 GMT

In article <6416@star.cs.vu.nl> mgemmel@cs.vu.nl (Martin Gemmel) writes:

> Is there a newer version of the Amiga port of ZC, the Sozobon
> C compiler, than version 1.01, Dec-88? If so, could someone
> please mail it to me?
> And, is there a newer version of A68k, than V2.42, Jan-89? If so,
> could someone please mail it to me?

> Thanks in advance...

or, better yet, inform the list where we can get them if they're ftp-able..

/======================================================\
|                  Gustavo Cordova                     |
|             al158305 @ mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx           |
|             al158305 @ 131.178.1.5                   |
|             bl158305 @ tecmtyvm.bitnet               |
\======================================================/
--
Gustavo Cordova
al158305@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx
pl158305@tecmtyvm.bitnet

disclaimer: These are my opinions, it you don't like'em, just kill'em.
*:MSGHDR_21
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5701; Mon,
 07 May 90 17:42:47 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 6053; Mon, 07 May 90 17:43:23 O
Date:         Mon, 7 May 90 06:00:07 CDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was I-AMIGA@RUTVM1
From:         "1.6d Revised List Processor" <LISTSERV@UTARLVM1>
Subject:      Renewal of your subscription to list I-AMIGA
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

Dear subscriber,

  Your subscription to list  I-AMIGA is due for renewal. If  you wish to remain
subscribed to I-AMIGA, please issue  the following command to LISTSERV@UTARLVM1
at your earliest convenience:

                     CONFIRM I-AMIGA

  You will be automatically removed from the  list if you do not send a CONFIRM
command within the next 7 days.

Virtually,

   The LISTSERV management
*:MSGHDR_22
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.05) with BSMTP id 5723; Mon,
 07 May 90 20:19:26 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 6984; Mon, 07 May 90 20:19:06 O
Date:         Mon, 7 May 90 11:11:17 CDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
From:         nop <nop@NIC.GAC.EDU>
Subject:      Renewal of your subscription to list I-AMIGA
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  "1.6d Revised List Processor"'s message of Mon,
              7 May 90 06:00:07 CDT <9005071342.AA08379@nic.gac.edu>

CONFIRM I-AMIGA
*:MSGHDR_23
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 5771; Mon,
 07 May 90 21:59:17 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 8129; Mon, 07 May 90 21:59:45 O
Date:         Mon, 7 May 90 11:00:00 CDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
From:         "Mark Gooderum - Univ. of Kansas ACS" <MARKV@UKANVAX>
Subject:      Re: DECWindows
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

DECWindows is a GUI (grahpical user interface) standard layered on top
of X Windows.  In this vein, any X Terminal can talk to a host with
DECWindows because once the stuff goes out over the net, its down to
the X Windows level.

There is a version of X Windows for the Amiga by a company named GfxBase,
I don't know anything more except that it requires an Ethernet conncection.
(Of course trying to run W Windows over anything else (an Amiga can talk to)
would be almost impossible.

For now,

Mark Gooderum
MARKV@UKANVAX
markv@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
*:MSGHDR_24
================================================================================
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE by bi.no (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 5773; Mon,
 07 May 90 21:59:40 CET
Received: by SEARN (Mailer R2.05) id 8151; Mon, 07 May 90 22:00:22 O
Date:         Mon, 7 May 90 13:30:12 CDT
Reply-To:     Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
Sender:       Info-Amiga List <I-AMIGA@FINHUTC>
From:         FINEBERG@WUMS2.WUSTL.EDU
Subject:      Re: 2.0, a500, a1000, etc.
To:           Espen Outtasight Lyngaas <EDB88002@NOBIVM.BITNET>

A Public note of appreciation for Dan's cogent, reasonable and highly accurate
note.
        Charlie Fineberg                  BITNET: FINEBERG@WUMS
        Wash. U. School of Medicine     internet: fineberg@wums2.wustl.edu
