F15 STRIKE EAGLE III <<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PART 3 FUNDAMENTALS OF FLIGHT THE FOUR FORCES There are four basic forces which affect each and every object which moves through the air. Lift, Thrust, Drag, and Gravity. The same forces which act upon a football to determine how far it is thrown also affect huge airliners with hundreds of people aboard. Controlled flight is the art of managing these four forces in order to travel through the air and reach a desired destination. Lift is perhaps the least understood of all the forces which affect aircraft. Lift is the difference in air pressure, above and below an object, caused by air rushing past it. As air strikes the leading surface of an object, the even flow of air is deflected over. under, and around the object. These deflected air streams change speed as they are forced past the object. In the case of an airplane, air moving over top of a wing surface moves at a greater speed than the air moving below. Since slow moving air has a higher air pressure, it causes the wing surface to rise. As the speed of the air moving over top of the wing surface increases, the difference in pressure above and below the wing becomes greater. The greater the difference in pressure becomes, the more Lift is ultimately generated. This same principle works on any object, not just wing surfaces. To test the theory. one only has ride in an automobile with a hand extended into the wind. (Remember to exercise caution when performing this experiment) The air striking your hand from underneath will force it upwards because of the difference in air pressures. Thrust is the aerodynamic force which propels an object through the air. The principle is the same whether the wing is pulled through air by a propeller or pushed from behind by a jet engine. The purpose of Thrust is to force air across the wing surface in order to create Lift. Obviously the faster an object moves through the air, the more air is forced past the wing. THE FOUR FORCES Lift Draa ANGLE OF Attack LOW SPEED HIGH ANGLE OF ATTACK To explain the principle behind Thrust we can refer back to our automobile experiment. By depressing the car's accelerator pedal, the driver adds power to the engine (Thrust) which in turn converts this additional energy into speed. As the automobile increases speed, more wind is forced past your hand causing it to rise. Notice that slowing the car down has an opposite effect. Drag is another force which is ofen misunderstood. To grasp the concept, it is first necessary to separate Drag from the idea of weight. Aerodynamic drag is anything which impedes the movement of an object through the air. While weight is a counter-balance to Lift, Drag is in direct opposition to Thrust. The more Drag created by a moving object, the greater amount of thrust is needed to overcome it. Returning yet again to the automobile experiment, Drag is the difference between keeping your hand horizontal, pointing in the direction of travel and raising a palm into the wind. Your palm creates more drag than your fingers slicing through the air like a knife. The last of the four forces and the only one we cannot control to some extent. is Gravity. Gravity is the force behind the saying, "Whatever goes 1 1 4 up, must come down." It must constantly be overcome by Lift in order for anything to remain airborne for long. If the force of Gravity becomes greater than the Lift being exerted, the object wing will be drawn toward the ground, eventually ending the flight. ANGLE OF ATTACK (AOA) The amount of lift generated by a particular surface is a function of its "angle of attack." Basically, AOA is the difference between the aircraft's flight path and the "chord line" of the wing. In level flight, the "chord line" of the wing is facing directly into the airflow. When climbing, the "chord line" of the wing is pitched upward relative to the airflow. With its nose and wing pitched up, the aircraft is said to have increased its angle of attack. The reverse is true when diving. STALLING THE AIRCRAFT It is a common misconception among the non-flying public that "stalling" an aircraft means trouble with the engines. If this were true. gliders (which have no engines) would be in a permanent stall. That simply isn't the case. G-FORCES WHEN BANKING LEVEL FLIGHT 1G Stalling an aircraft refers to a condition which occurs when a wing fails to produce the amount of lift needed to maintain flight. In other words, a stall is the lack of an adequate airflow passing under the wings to overcome the force of gravity. It is important to note that speed, pitch attitude, and bank inclination are all factors in determining whether a plane is about to stall. An aircraft in level flight may stall if it attempts too sharp a turn without increasing its speed. This is due to insufficient lift being generated by the wing in direct opposition to gravity's effect on the aircraft. The effects of a stall are different depending on the aircraft. Some aircraft simply assume a mild nose-down attitude until returning to level flight. Other aircraft may enter a sudden and potentially dangerous spin. On low level missions a pilot may not have time to recover before striking the ground. This is especially true if one wing stalls before the other. 1 1 5 11. AIR TO AIR COMBAT (DOGFIGHTING) During the normal course of a mission, an F-15E should not be used as an interceptor. That type of mission should be left to the Eagle- Charlies. That's what they are there for. However, there may come a time that you are engaged in air combat at a time and place not of your choosing. If your aircraft is engaged while returning from a mission the enemy will quickly discover that without ordnance the F-15E retains all of its exceptional dogfighting ability. But if you are "bounced" while in-bound to the target area, a fully loaded F-15 will be fighting at a disadvantage. The worst time to become engaged is always on the approach to a target. Your back-seater will have his head "inside the cockpit", preoccupied with delivering ordnance. While it is not impossible to dogfight while loaded with ordnance, it is exceedingly difficult. Certain maneuvers are out of your flight envelope. In most instances, an aircraft will jettison ordnance if attacked. This automatically aborts the mission since you may as well return to base. If however, you decide to retain your ordnance, you must assume an offensive posture early in the fight. The following section is offered as a brief familiarization with air combat. It includes how to perform maneuvers that have been common to dogfighting since 1915. Performed correctly they will help you in gaining the advantage over attacking aircraft or aid you in escaping from unfavor able situations. HOW TO FIGHT Assuming you have read the preceding chapter on how to fly an F-15E, you are now ready to take on the opposition. Its a cruel world out there and there are no points for second place. This section is dedicated to giving you some tactical experience before you go head- to-head with your first MiG-29. Aerial combat tests all your flying skills during periods of extreme stress. Engaging an enemy aircraft requires split-second timing. Reactions in combat must be instinctive since there is little time for decision making travelling at Mach 1. The first thing every pilot should learn in order to become a top- notch fighter-jock, is Energy Management. The principle behind energy management is being able to fly the aircraft while maximizing the benefits derived from the four forces discussed earlier. Used properly, the "Big Four" can give you distinct advantages in combat. Ignoring them only leads to trouble. Think of your F-15's flight envelope as being egg shaped. In the horizontal plane, it will fly a perfect circle if constant g-force and speed are maintained. In the vertical plane, however, the circle will be distorted by gravity. At the top of the circle, the fighter will be traveling slow and turning tightly. Near the bottom the aircraft will have picked up speed during its descent and have a much longer and flatter arc. To begin with, a pilot that is caught flying low and slow is a poor manager. Granted, sometimes a pilot is forced into this predicament by circumstances beyond his control. A pilot found in such a situation has few options if "bounced" by enemy fighters. He cannot accelerate fast enough to escape nor can he trade altitude for speed. Low and slow is a deadly combination. Remember, speed equals life. An aircraft does not carry enough fuel to allow a pilot to fly in full afterburner throughout an entire mission. Afterburners are fine at high altitudes where the air is less dense and offers less resistance (Drag). But the heavier air at low altitudes causes an afterburner to use too much fuel for practical use. Remember also, that the IR signature of an aircraft's jet-engine is like a beacon to heat-seeking missiles. The more throttle you apply, the better I R target you become. So, pilots must learn to make the most of the speed that is available to them. The primary means of gathering speed without boosting the throttles is to point the nose of the aircraft down. Even shallow dives of short duration enable an aircraft to build-up considerable momentum. Converting this momentum into speed is a tactic which can only be used for so long. Sooner or later the aircraft must either pull out of the dive or strike the ground. One sure way to lose all the energy you've built up in the dive is to pull up too abruptly. To transition from a dive. gently pull back on the stick until your wings are horizontal to the ground. Your energy and airspeed will then bleed off gradually. This way you are making the most of your dive momentum. Diving is like energy stored in a battery. A battery releases its energy gradually and only as needed. It continues to provide energy until it runs out of juice. Another way of losing speed unnecessarily is by making high-g turns when less sharp turns would work equally well. Even aircraft as aerodynamically maneuverable as the F-15 have trouble sustaining high- g turns for long. Try it once and watch how rapidly your speed drops off. Once you load-up your wings in a sustained turn, all your lift is being directed horizontal. The aircraft runs the risk of stalling since nothing is being used to oppose gravitational forces. Of course, the most obvious way to lose energy and air speed is by climbing. Increasing your altitude is like putting money in the bank for future use. The more altitude an aircraft possesses, the more potential energy will be available once in combat. The problem is that the higher you go, the more visible you become. As the pilot, you must be judge whether flying at a higher altitude is worth the added risk. 1 1 7 Energy management is a necessary part of everyday flying but is absolutely essential once in combat. Not only do you need to remain aware of your own aircraft's energy status, it is always a good idea to pay attention to what the other guy is doing with his aircraft. Watching the other guy is part of another major element involved in air combat. Situational Awareness. Situational Awareness (or SA, in fighter-speak) is the concept of taking in the whole picture. New pilots become so focused on their own aircraft that they lose track of what is going on around them. In a effort to shoot down an opponent, a pilot may forget to look out for the enemy's wingman until it is too late. Bearing in for the easy kill, the novice often finds another "bandit" tucked neatly in his i six " Two-seat aircraft, like the F-15, have the advantage of a second pair of eyes when it comes to SA. The "GIB" (Guy In Back) is usually detailed to take some of the work load off the pilot. In return for the free ride, the Wizzo must be able to spot enemy aircraft the pilot may have missed. Although air combat is a three dimensional affair, inexperienced pilots tend to fight in only two. Pilots must learn to fight in the vertical as well as horizontal plane. As part of a pilot's situational awareness, he must be able to judge the distance relationships between his aircraft and the enemy's. Adding a third dimension to combat sometimes distorts this spatial perception. Despite some truly remarkable advances in technology, the basics of air combat have not changed since the Wright brothers. Missiles and jet engines have quickened the pace of combat considerably but a dogfight is still a dogfight. The human element has remained the one constant in an ever changing world and air combat continues to be a man against man proposition. The better man almost always wins, even when flying an inferior aircraft. In fact, modern gadgetry often hinders rather than assists a pilot in completing his mission. The noise generated by all these systems is deafening and a distraction. Imagine having to concentrate on SAM warnings, missile-ready growls and your back-seater talking all at the same time. Add to that vector commands and real time intelligence coming over your headset from an AWACS. The pilot rapidly experiences an information overload and no longer hears anything being said. Many pilots in the Vietnam era went through a personal check list whereby they began turning off various systems as soon as they left the ground. The advanced systems in contemporary fighters are nice to have but in the final analysis only a pilot's skill and instinct will bring him home. The most important quality for fighter pilots to possess is the selfconfidance of being number one. Fighter pilots by nature are aggressive "go-getters" not afraid to use their God-given initiative. One thing they are not, however is reckless or foolhardy. Even though fighter-pilots tend to push themselves to the limit, they are also professionals trained to instinctively calculate the risks they take. "Only the spirit of attack born ill a brave heart, will overcome the odds. --Adolf Galland, WlI Luftwaffe Ace _ THE FIVE PHASES OF AIR COMBAT _ Despite how aerial combat looks in the movies there are five distinct phases of every engagement. Only after the aircraft become locked in a "furball" does the battle take on these familiar "Hollywood" characteristics. Dogfighting is just one phase of aerial combat. The losing pilot has usually already been defeated before it reaches this phase. He just doesn't know it yet. 1. DETECTION You can't shoot what you don't see. Detection is perhaps the most critical of all the preliminary phases of combat. The fast paced nature of modern combat allows little time for decision making. Therefore, getting even a few seconds jump on your opponent can mean a great deal. Early detection of an enemy allows you to begin your maneuvering, and possibly catch him unaware. Even if you are detected, you have already gained the initiative. Modern aircraft possess powerful radars which can detect aircraft at ranges exceeding 100 miles. Still, even at cruising speed, an enemy aircraft could cover that ground in a very short time. Early detection adds to your situational awareness and gives you the ability to keep the enemy at arm's length. 1 1 8 Once you have detected an enemy, either visually or on radar, keep him in sight. There's old fighter-pilot saying that goes, "Lose sight- lose fight " If you lose sight of the enemy, you must start the detection process all over again. It may be too late. The enemy will have already started his pre-engagement maneuvering by the time you spot him again. The simple fact of air combat from World War I to the present day, is that most pilots are shot down before they ever detect the enemy. Surprise is a key element of every engagement and usually deters the outcome of the battle. Stay alert. In fighter slang, being "padlocked" means that you have visually spotted an enemy and are afraid to take your eyes off him. Aircraft are so small and travel so fast that if you look away for a moment, you might not spot him again. To deal with this problem, aircraft controls and displays have been configured to limit the number of times a pilot must avert his eyes from a target. The Head-Up Display (HUD) superimposes visual flight cues directly in line with the pilot's field of vision. This keeps him from having to continually refocus his attention inside the cockpit to check his status. In addition to the HUD, the "stick" has been redesigned to give the pilot fingertip control over the aircraft. The "Hands-On Throttle and Stick" or HOTAS design allows the pilot to perform common flight functions without having to take his hands off his principal means of controlling the aircraft. 2. CLOSURE The second phase of air combat is known as Closure. During this phase, you are faced with a number of very basic decisions. After making a detection, you must first determine if the contact is hostile and then, whether it constitutes a threat to your mission. This phase usually opens with one or both sides launching radarguided missiles at targets detected at long range. The longer distances make radar-guided missiles more effective since it is easier to keep a target within the radar envelope. Depending on the effectiveness of the electronic counter-measures, radar-guided missiles will continue to track targets they are "locked onto " Survivors of this initial exchange proceed to the closure phase of battle. Once you decide to engage the contact, you are committed. The objective in this phase of combat is to bridge the distance between yourself and your intended target. You must quickly figure out how to approach the target so as to arrive in a superior firing position. The most advantageous firing position is directly behind your target, known as being in his "six o'clock." From this position the enemy pilot will have a difficult time shaking you off his tail. Not only can you follow him through his maneuvers but he will be unable to bring his weapons to bear on your aircraft. You must pay careful attention to your relative speeds. If you make a mistake and overshoot, the roles will be reversed. The enemy will now be in your "six' and fixing to give you problems. If the detection is made by radar you probably have already tipped your hand. The opposing pilot's RWR is likely to be activated by your radar sweep. However, just because the enemy is alert to your presence does not mean that he knows your exact bearing. If closure is performed properly, you may be able to arrive at a firing solution before he can locate you. To some extent, your maneuvering during closure will depend on what type of ordnance you are carrying. Closure does not mean to imply being "close" to the enemy. Sometimes the closure phase ends when the aircraft are still many tens of miles apart. The missile age has pushed back the engagement envelope to beyond visual detection ranges. In a modern context, the closure phase ends when you are able to bring a weapon system to bear. Remember, that the enemy pilot will also be maneuvering to achieve the same thing and speed is essential to cut down on his reaction time. As you and the enemy close, your aircraft will either have the advantage, be disadvantaged, or be neutral in relation to the opposing aircraft. Which of the three positions you find yourself in determines your action in the next phase of combat. "A MiG at 'six' is better than no Mig at all." 3. ATTACK The Attack portion of air combat is considered by many pilots to be merely the execution segment of the previous phase. 1 19 At the conclusion of the Closure phase, it should be easy to obtain a "kill" if you have reached an advantaged position. All that is left to do is select the proper ordnance, push the button, and avoid the debris. Things are slightly different if you are in a disadvantaged position. It is imperative that you evade your opponent at the earliest opportunity and regain the superior position. As a minimum you should attempt to spoil your opponent's firing solution by performing one or more maneuvers discussed in the following segment. If neither you or your opponent has achieved a superior position, the battle is momentarily a draw (neutral). Under these circumstances, the first pilot to make a mistake, loses the battle. There are few second chances in air combat, so don't be the one to make the first mistake. 4. MANEUVER If a mistake is to be made, it is usually made here. The first pilot to pick a wrong maneuver or perform one incorrectly has given his opponent an edge. This phase of air combat is characterized by the twisting and turning battle often depicted in the movies. It is where pilots go head to head, performing Basic Fighter Maneuvers (BFM) in a effort to get a clear missile or gun shot. This section is devoted to familiarizing the new pilot with Basic Fighter Maneuvers. In order to survive in combat, you must learn how to perform them correctly and be able to recognize them when an opponent tries them on you. Your objective in this phase of combat is to position your aircraft in the opponent's "six o'clock" position. Once in his "six", your objective becomes staying in there until you have shot him down. Easier said, then done. Your opponent is trying his best to shake you off his tail and disengage. Given the opportunity, you can bet he'd love to get in a quick burst of gunfire of his own. The g-forces involved in conducting BFM at a high rate of speed is a task multiplier. Flying at a constant rate of speed in level flight a pilot experiences only the normal effects of gravity or 1 9 But as a pilot enters a hard turn, he begins to be forced down into his seat as the effects of gravity become more pronounced. Simple things become difficult as your body assumes many times its own weight. Even moving his hands around the stick becomes tiring. If a pilot continues to pull back on the stick, his turn becomes sharper but g-forces increase proportionately. The blood in his body starts pooling in his feet under the additional gravity. Unless he unloads the stick, the pilot may experience a g-induced blackout. Bear this in mind as you blissfully perform all these wonderful maneuvers. Keep an eye on the HUD and make note of the g-forces you are imposing on yourself and the aircraft. While your F-15 can take nineg's no sweat, to a human body it is quite a painful experience. BREAK TURN A Break turn is merely an abrupt change of direction made in response to an opponent's attack. It is usually made toward the enemy aircraft in an effort to spoil his aim or firing solution. A Break is made at the maximum turn rate with wings inclined at 90 degrees. It is a high-g maneuver which if sustained leads to a rapid loss of airspeed. This may cause your opponent to overshoot, so be prepared to take advantage of his mistake. Even if your opponent is able to stay on your tail, his "angle-off'' perspective makes you a difficult target. If nothing else, a Break turn gives you time to recover from your initial surprise and start your own maneuvering. You cannot win air combat by remaining on the defensive. Use the Break turn to begin your offensive strategy. EARLY TURN If the closure battle for position has resulted in a stalemate, your opponent may decide to barrel straight in to bring on an engagement. The early turn maneuver is used to counter this head to head confrontation. As depicted in the diagram. it is a transitional maneuver used to get behind your opponent from a head-on aspect. The trick to performing the early turn is to anticipate your opponent's future position in relation to your own. Inexperienced opponents usually fail to react to this maneuver in a timely fashion. They are soon caught in a turning battle they can't win. 1 20 BREAK TURN LAG ROLL Another maneuver designed to cause an opponent to overshoot is the Lag Roll. The object of the maneuver is to quickly reduce your speed by increasing your aircraft's Drag. Simply push the stick all the way over, left or right. Hold the stick in the direction of the roll while being careful to maintain the proper heading. If performed correctly, your opponent will be forced out in front of you. In this position, he's just dead meat. Add him to your collection. SCISSORS A Scissors maneuver is actually a series of turn and counter-turns in which the opposing aircraft are each attempting to get behind the other. This naturally causes both pilots to fly as slow as they dare in order to tighten their turns. Whichever pilot forces the other to take the lead in this type of battle comes out the winner Speed brakes and flaps help to slow you down but caution must be used to prevent an accidental stall. If both pilots are equally experienced, the scissors maneuver usually ends in a draw. As airspeed continues to drop, the hard turning involved may easily lead to a stall situation. Before that happens, disengage from the scissors and reposition yourself. Disengaging from a scissors battle takes careful timing. Wait until you are pointing away from your opponent in an outward turn, roll inverted and dive away to increase the separation distance. Your opponent's airspeed will be low as well, giving you time to escape. SPLIT-5 TURN SPLIT S An Immelmann is best performed when begun from level flight or a The Split-S is a reversal maneuver combining a half-roll and dive to slight nose-down attitude. Simply pull back on the stick, applying pressure increase speed. It is a quick way of changing your direction 180 degrees until you reach the vertical plane. As your air speed continues to drop off, and is usually begun from level flight or slight climb. you must judge for yourself when to complete the maneuver before stalling. To perform a Split-S, simply roll inverted. Once inverted, pull sharply The Immelmann is completed by pulling through the maneuver back back on the stick to enter a dive. This maneuver causes you to lose consider- into level but inverted flight. Once in level flight, a simple half-roll returns able altitude so make sure you have room before attempting a Split-S you to a normal flight profile. As you enter the dive, punch the throttle and go to afterburner if your airspeed is under 350 knots. You are now travelling 180 degrees from your LOOP original heading with a reservoir of stored energy. Use this energy to By now you undoubtedly have noticed that a Loop is nothing more than disengage or reposition yourself for a missile shot combining a Split-S with an Immelmann, or vice versa. Loops are per- formed to avoid an enemy in your six o'clock while trying to aim your guns IMMELMANN TURN at his tail at the same time. The Immelmann turn is named after its inventor, Max Immelmann, a Either half of the maneuver can be performed first depending on the German World War I ace. It is the exact inverse of the Split-S. Whereas the circumstances. If you are traveling fast and wish to slow down, pull into an Split-Sis performed as a dive maneuver, the Immelmann; as climbing half- Immelmann. Continue to apply constant back pressure while reducing loop used to get on the tail of an enemy coming head-on. your throttle Once the nose comes over the top, your speed increases as Speed is the critical factor in performing an Immelmann turn. Before you come down the back side of the Split-S. Add or subtract power as needed. attempting an Immelmann, check your air speed to insure that your aircraft Start your Loop with a Split-S if you do not have enough energy to has the energy to complete the maneuver without stalling perform an Immelmann immediately. Depending on how much altitude 1 22 you wish to lose, keep your throttle open . This provides you with additional energy for when you pull into your climb. Note that you end up flying inverted along your original heading. STRAIGHT PURSUIT YO YO A Straight Pursuit Yo-Yo is used when pursuing an enemy trying desperately to disengage from combat. For example, an opponent has caught you off-guard with a sudden Split-S and is rapidly leaving the battle area. You turn to pursue and find him well below and far in front. To close the distance, you dive down until you reach the opponent's altitude. If you are still unable to close within weapon's range the Yo-Yo maneuver is used to trade altitude for air speed. Simply enter a shallow dive, until you gradually begin to overtake him. When in range, pull the aircraft's nose up to engage. This maneuver is repeated as often as is necessary. 5. DISENGAGEMENT Disengagement is a critical part of air combat. The best way to disengage from combat is to shoot down your opponent. If this seems unlikely, maybe it's time to start thinking how you are going to get away. Given the reach of modern air-to-air missiles, getting out of combat is much more difficult than getting in. You must figure out a method of putting some distance between you and the enemy before he realizes what you are up to. It requires careful timing to avoid being shot down while trying to get away. If your opponent is not equipped to carry missiles (or has run out), the job of disengaging is much easier. All you need do is maintain a lateral separation which exceeds the range of his guns. If he gets in your "six" and wants to follow you home, fine. A missile equipped opponent has a much longer reach. Even if your disengagement is successful, chances are your opponent will get at least a parting missile shot. There's no way to prevent this launch although ECM and skillful maneuvering may keep it from hitting you. If you have managed your fuel properly you can afford to use a little afterburner for extra speed. Hopefully your opponent has been less careful with his fuel and must weigh his chances of getting home should he prolong his pursuit. CANNON/GUN COMBAT At the beginning of the Vietnam era, certain USAF fighters went to war without a cannon or gun. Believing that the missile age heralded a new era in air combat, theorists considered a gun unnecessary. To destroy an opponent, a pilot needed only to detect a target on his radar, select one of a number of missile options and push a button. Theorists were quick to point out that guns were useless except at very close range and that the speed of modern aircraft made close engagements unlikely. Furthermore, enemy aircraft were to be kept at missile range and destroyed beyond visual range (BVR). Pilots were told not to expect the type of twisting and turning "fur-ball" engagements which were a common occurrence during Korea. The Vietnam War proved the theorists wrong. The use of gunfire in air combat has not changed since World War 1 It is still a matter of maneuvering in close to your enemy and then pumping lead into his aircraft until it goes down. The trick is to obtain a good firing position from where the enemy can not return your fire. This generally means that most strafing attacks occur when one aircraft gets in the six o'clock arc of another. Firing from an position not directly in line with the target's flight path is known as an "angle-off" or deflection shot. Firing from an angle-off position gives you less time to line up the shot and requires you to lead the target. The best firing method for a deflection shot is to put up a wall of lead and let the enemy fly into. In 1969, the original F-15 contract called for the development of a pure air superiority fighter. There was never any intention of building a secondary capability into the design. The McDonnell-Douglas engineers went by the motto, " not a pound for air to ground." In other words, no feature of the aircraft was to be used for anything other than dogfighting. But the F-15 proved to be such a versatile machine that continuing to neglect its air to ground potential was deemed a waste of a good design. Over 30% of the aircraft was completely re-engineered to accommodate air-to-ground missions. With the addition of sophisticated targeting equipment and dedicated back-seater, a dual role capability was built into the basic fighter design. MISSILE COMBAT There are two types of air-to-air missiles carried by modern aircraft, radar- guided and heat-seeking missiles. It is important to remember that each type of missile has its own unique set of advantages as well as limitations. RADAR GUIDED MISSILES Radar-guided missiles come in three basic categories: beam riders, semiactive radar-homers, and active homers. The first two categories require the firing aircraft to maintain a radar "lock" on the target aircraft. This means the firing aircraft is essentially stuck with having to track the target aircraft while the missile is in flight. Beam-riding missiles are surface to air missiles launched from either fixed sites or mobile launchers. The missile follows the path of a laser beam directed from the launching site at the target aircraft. The beam must be held on the target throughout the missile's flight to insure a hit. Semi-active radar missiles require the target to be continually illuminated by the firing aircraft's radar. The missile then guides itself by using the reflected radar energy it detects coming off the target. Active homing missiles transmit and receive their own radar signals allowing them to track a target without help from the firing aircraft. These are the most deadly. To the firing aircraft, active-homers are "fire and forget". After they are launched the firing aircraft is free to continue maneuvering. INFRARED MISSILES (HEAT SEEKERS) Infrared missiles use heat as the source of their guidance rather than radar signals. These missiles also are "fire and forget" but generally have shorter ranges than their radar-guided cousins. Heat-seeking missiles operate by homing in on the greatest source of heat within their seeker's cone of detection. These missiles must be used with care during a general engagement because they are just as likely to home in on friendly aircraft as enemy. The early models were often fooled by active counter-measures such as flares. Some missiles could even be decoyed by the Sun or glare off the tops of clouds. To obtain the greatest assurance of a hit, heat-seekers must be aimed at the hot exhaust area of a target. On later models, the I R sensitivity has been increased to allow the missile to track a target from any aspect. These missiles are less easily fooled by ECM. DEALING WITH MISSILE ATTACKS The primary way of dealing with missile attacks is to avoid them. Your preflight briefing covers the location of known or suspected SAM locations. If you have paid close attention you can plan your route of ingress around them. Sometimes the target is so heavily defended (like Baghdad), it is impossible to plan a flight without encountering a few SAM sites. Make careful note of the locations and types of SAMs you are unable to by- pass. An audio signal is usually your first warning that a missile has been fired. Once you receive this cue, it's time to start carrying out your plan of action. You have two choices, evasive maneuvering or the use of ECM. EVASIVE MANEUVERING When it comes to flying, the same rules apply as when driving the family car. You must fly defensively, watch out for the other guy, and expect the unexpected. Defensive flying is what Situation Awareness is all about. If you are not aware of what is going on, you can hardly be expected to react to it. Despite being totally aware of your surroundings and best defensive flying efforts, the enemy will eventually get a shot off. Once the warning lights start going off in your cockpit. it is too late to devise a strategy. You must fly with a plan already in mind. The Basic Fighter Maneuvers (BFM) described for use in dog fighting can also be used to defeat enemy missiles. The job is somewhat more difficult because a missile is faster and can perform without regard for a human pilot. But at the same time. missiles only have to be fooled once before going ballistic. TURNING INSIDE A MISSILE: When a missile is closing in on your F-15, keep your head and don't panic. Because the missile's turning arc is wider than your aircraft's, you still have a chance to outmaneuver it. If a missile is approaching from the rear you can perform a high-g turn hoping to get inside its turning radius. It is best to wait until the last moment before starting your Break. If you try this turn too early. the missile may still turn into you. TURNING TOWARD A MISSILE The F-15 is evading a missile using its maneuver power alone. As the Eagle turns, the missile tries to follow, but cannot turn fast enough. The missile "falls behind" and passes harmlessly to the rear. TURNING TOWARD A MISSILE: If a missile is approaching from more of a side angle, turning toward it may also get inside its turn radius. As depicted in the diagram, your turn must keep the missile's flight path at a right angles to your own. Gradually, the missile will fall into a lag pursuit profile and pass well behind you. EVADING HEAD-ON MISSILES: Evading a missile which is approaching from a Head-on position is a two step procedure. First, when the missile reaches a point between 8 and 12 kilometers away, perform a 90 degree Break turn. The missile's flight path is now perpendicular to your heading. Step two is simply following the procedure under turning toward a missile. 111. ELECTRONIC COUNTER-MEASURES Electronic Counter-Measures come in two basic types, those designed to fool radar-guided missiles and those used against heat-seekers. It is important to identify the type of missile tracking your aircraft in order to deploy the appropriate counter-measure. CHAFF Chaff is stored within the aircraft in (CMDs) Counter-Measure Dispensers located directly underneath the main engine intakes. It is used to defend your aircraft against radar-guided missiles by releasing a cloud of metal strips cut to a particular wave-length. The strips serve to confuse the enemy radar by cluttering the image with many false returns. The classic technique for deploying chaff is to release a bundle as soon as your RWR alarms. With luck, the chaff has a chance of breaking the contact. If the missile continues to guide, wait to deploy additional chaff until the missile is within three to five kilometers. Since your supply of chaff is limited you must use it judiciously. Once the missile "locks-on" to the chaff, it will fly into the cloud and explode on contact. The trick is to deploy the chaff at just the right moment. If deployed too early the missile will not be fooled. If deployed too late, it won't do any good. FLARES For defense against IR homing (heat-seeking) missiles, the F-15 is equipped with a number of heat producing devices, commonly known as Flares. Flares are used to decoy heat-seeking missiles away from your aircraft. Like chaff, your aircraft carries only a finite supply of these Flares. A Flare burns for only a short time (5-10 seconds). During this time, the IR missile hopefully is lured away from your aircraft. Once the Flare burns out, however, the missile is free to re acquire a new target. The new target may again be your aircraft if you have not maneuvered out of its view. It is never a good idea to trust ECM entirely. It is always better to have an evasive maneuver ready in case it fails. It is far more reliable (and cheaper) to physically evade a missile, rather than try to confuse it with ECM. TEWS The F-15 features a specially designed ECM system known as the Tactical Electronic Warfare System (TEWS). It consists of two main components; the AN/ALR-56 RWR and the AN/ALQ-135(V) radar jammer. These systems, described in greater detail in Chapter 1, detect the presence of both ground-based and aerial radars. The primary job of the TEWS is to provide you with prompt radar warnings, giving you ample time to deal with the threat. The TEWS is a completely hands-off internal system. The AN/ALR56 RWR detects the radar and gives audio signals when an enemy is attempting to gain a radar "lock" on your aircraft. The AN/ALQ-1 35(V) is an internal jammer which functions automatically to defeat the hostile radar's acquisition. The pilot, who must first activate the jammer, is then free to maneuver or deploy chaff to further confuse his aircraft's radar signature. IV GROUND A ATTACK MISSIONS PREFLIGHT BRIEFING The most important part of any mission takes place before the pilots ever leave the ground. The preflight briefing is the last chance for all the members of a particular package to get together and discuss tactics, coordination, etc. Mission details are laid out at this time to sort out any lingering confusion. Smart pilots use this time wisely. They know it's always better to be on the ground wishing they were in the air, than already in the air wishing they were on the ground. Once in the air, its too late to start sorting out details. THE FLIGHT PROFILE One of the first things to get settled during the briefing is the flight profile. In other words. pilots need to figure out how they intend to fly from their base, attack the target, and then return home. A number of factors go into this decision such as weather, range to target, enemy disposition and equipment, etc. Flight profiles are usually broken down into three mission segments, ingress, target, egress. Altitudes are assigned to each of these segments accordingly. A Flight profile might read Hi-Lo-Hi. In this instance, strike aircraft are proceeding to the target up high to conserve fuel. Upon reaching their Ingress Point (IP), the package drops down low for their target run. After striking the target, they climb to a preset high altitude for the return trip home. Based on the flight profile, certain assumptions can be made regarding the mission. Because the ingress is being conducted at high altitude the package is apparently not concerned about being spotted. Air superiority has either been achieved or the SAM threat is negligible. The target is probably heavily defended by triple-A so the attacking aircraft drop down to use the terrain for cover. On the way out, the formation again takes advantage of high altitude fuel conservation so it is likely that the target is some distance away. If the flight profile had been Lo-Lo-Lo, the target is likely to be close by and heavily defended by both point and area air defense weapons. LoLo-Lo missions require the package to fly low to the ground to avoid detection or enemy air patrols. While a low flight profile protects against SAMs, it exposes the aircraft to all kinds of triple- A ground fire. These are the tough missions. The combination of high speed and low altitude leaves no margin for error SURVEYING THE TARGET The target should be thoroughly researched and surveyed prior to the mission. Photo-intelligence from satellites or even RF-4 Phantoms should be disseminated at this time so that the pilots have an accurate picture of the target. Once in flight, the next opportunity the attacking aircraft have to survey the target is by LANTIRN. The systems displays provide the Wizzo with photo-quality, high-resolution images. Even if flying a Lo profile, the FLIR's "squint" angle is such that ground features are distinguishable even from a distance. A last minute survey is necessary to insure that the attacking aircraft are properly aligned with the target. The target run should be performed at high speed to minimize exposure to hostile fire. Locating the target(s) early gives the Wizzo extra time to select and deploy his weapons. ORDNANCE OPTIONS The target run and weapons release is dictated to some extent by the type of ordnance carried "Fire and Forget" weapons, like the AGM-65 Maverick missile, allow the aircraft to stand-off at a safe distance from the target. Other "smart" weapons require guidance from the aircraft's LANTIRN system and a direct line of sight to the target. The most difficult type of ordnance to release are still the unguided iron bombs or "dumb bombs." These weapons have changed little since World War ll. They still require that the attacking aircraft overfly the target area. Modern aircraft, however, are not locked in to the straight and level bomb runs of the past. A good pilot develops special techniques using both terrain and maneuver to get in close and drop his unguided munitions. TARGET APPROACH OPTIONS DIVE BOMBING The easiest target approach is the time-honored Dive Bombing technique. Dive bombing requires the target run to begin at medium altitude between 6-12,000 feet. Because the aircraft has built up excess speed during the ingress, speed brakes must be applied before transitioning into the dive. Once the aircraft is properly aligned on the target, nose over into a 30 degree down angle . I n the few seconds you have while in the dive, make any final targeting corrections and release the ordnance. The release should be performed at around 3,000 feet. You must allow yourself time to escape the blast effects of your ordnance. Immediately retract your speed brake, open the throttle and exit the area. Pilots which damage their aircraft with their own bombs should perhaps consider a new career. If they make it back to base, they have some explaining to do at the very least. POP UP BOMBING Another method of unguided delivery is the Pop-Up. This technique is more difficult than the simple dive bomb method but exposes the attacking aircraft to less triple-A. It takes careful timing and good spatial perception (Situational Awareness). If you are not used to working in three dimensions, stick to dive bombing and take your chances with enemy ground fire. Pop-Up bombing is very unforgiving if you make a mistake. The idea behind Pop-Up bombing is to approach the target at a very low altitude. At the last minute the aircraft is pulled into an inverted climb to identify and pin point the target. Once the target is identified, the aircraft noses over into a dive, half rolls, then delivers ordnance normally. The egress is usually performed at low altitude. The biggest danger in performing a Pop-Up maneuver is misjudging altitude and being unable to pull up in time. The margin for error is very narrow. Rather than pressing your luck, it is better to go around. By now they know you're coming. So change your approach heading and strike from an unexpected direction. This attack option, if performed correctly the first time, gives the enemy no time to react. You are exiting the area unscathed just as the first bombs begin going off. It takes practice to perfect the Pop-Up but it is well worth the effort. LEVEL BOMBING Level bombing is perhaps the most dangerous of all your available options. You are trading predictability for heightened bombing accuracy. However, deploying stand-off weapons such as the Maverick missile or various glide bombs, lets you keep a safe distance away from the target's fixed air defenses. In actual practice, level bombing has changed very little since World War ll. Although massed bomber formations are a thing of the past, level bombing still involves a steady run-up to the target. Approach speeds have greatly increased but advances in radar-controlled triple- A technology have made this method of bombing extremely risky. It is seldom used if other means of delivery are available. The target approach should be conducted as low as the surrounding terrain permits, preferably 300 feet or less. Because the mapping radar is unable to generate HRMs at such a low altitude, pilots are required to expose their aircraft to enemy radar coverage while designating targets. The course should be off-set at least 25 degrees from the target's bearing while producing targeting maps. This cuts down on the delay time in processing the map image. Once the target is designated, turn to the proper target bearing and assume your delivery altitude. Engage your afterburner to minimize your exposure time over the target defenses. With ranged "smart" weapons, you may launch the ordnance from a safe stand-off distance. Iron bombs (unguided) require that you overfly the target. If this is the case, deliver your ordnance fast and "get out of Dodge." EGRESS The last important consideration is the egress, or exit from the target area. To a great extent, your exit is predetermined by the enemy disposition. If the target is heavily defended, remaining low may be your only safe option. But against less well defended targets, you may decide to regain cruising altitude soon after leaving the area. This is usually a good time to hit your afterburner if your fuel status allows it. You should be concentrating on putting as much distance between you and the target area as possible. Even though the ordnance has been released, the mission is far from over. Begin checking the general condition of your aircraft for possible damage from ground fire. Be sure to scan your instrumentation for abnormal readings and prepare for the long ride home. 1. IRAQ: DESERT STORM "In just 100 hours, they went from the fourth largest army in the world to the second largest army in Iraq." --Lt. General Thomas W. Kelly THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR Throughout the 1980s, Iraq fought a bloody, stagnant war of attrition with the Islamic Republic of Iran. While the war was characterized by heavy ground fighting, air power was used infrequently and never to any great effect. With the exception of a number of air strikes against economic targets (oil facilities and tanker traffic in the Gulf), sorties were relatively few and far between. The Iranian Air Force consisted primarily of U.S. aircraft that had been purchased by the Shah before his overthrow. Despite possessing some of the most capable and advanced aircraft in the world, the Iranian air force spent the majority of the war grounded for lack of spare parts. Iran had started the war with hundreds of modern U.S. fighter-bombers including F-14s Tomcats and F-4 Phantoms. The inventory quickly dwindled as aircraft were cannibalized for spares. By the end of the war, Iran was lucky to have 80 aircraft combat ready at any one time. IRAQI STRATEGIC AIR DEFENSE Iraq had eight years to construct a national air defense capable of dealing with the Iranian threat. A centralized system was developed which reflected the doctrinal preference of Iraq's chief military benefactor, the Soviet Union. While the system worked reasonably well against Iran (which wasn't doing that much flying), it was hardly suited to conditions that might be imposed by a more determined opponent. The Iraqi air defense scheme sectioned the country into four zones, each responsible for its own airspace. While these zones were independent of each other, all four were tied to a central air defense ministry located in downtown Baghdad. Intermediate radar control centers in the chain were located in major cities such as Kirkuk, Nasiriya, and Rutba, among others. Ground Control Intercept radars (GCIs) were dispersed throughout the country to complete the lower echelon network. One factor aided the Coalition's air campaign immensely. Most Iraqi air defense headquarters and communications facilities were constructed above ground. Since Saddam Hussein had initially come to power in a coup backed by the military, he was always on guard against being overthrown in a counter-coup. Hussein was therefore reluctant to position his command centers out of easy reach should he be forced to attack disloyal members of his own army. Being stationary above-ground targets made them easy prey for Coalition aircraft. Tall King low frequency radars provided Iraq with an umbrella-like coverage although they frequently were out of action with maintenance problems. When operational they gave Iraq the ability to detect high altitude targets at ranges in excess of 500 kilometers. For coverage at lower altitudes, fast scanning Squat Eye radars were used. Iraqi interceptors relied on ground guidance from Bar Lock radar systems which gave both height and range information. This interlocking system of coverage and command is preferred by the Soviet Union and is designed to closely tether its interceptors to ground controllers. In military circles, this type of interlocking defense is referred to as an Integrated Air Defense System (IADS). THE INTEGRATED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM The operational principal behind IADS is that all facets of a nation's air defense (interceptors, SAMs and triple-A sites) can be coordinated and combined as part of a total defense plan . Crucial to the success of this type of air defense plan is the ability to communicate with the component parts. Each element must be able to communicate instructions as well as receive guidance from higher up the chain of command. Failure to maintain communications is the "Achilles"' heel in such a system. Ideally, an IADS is constructed in such a manner as to provide overlapping and layered coverage. For example, long range, high altitude SAMs would provide blanket coverage to the entire nation while being protected by shorter range SAMs suited for low altitude engagements. Triple-A sites would be tactically positioned near high value targets such as industrial plants or air bases. Fighter aircraft would be redeployed to dispersal fields and used to fill gaps in SAM coverage. Once again, communication is the key. Interceptors must remain linked to a network of ground radars for guidance. SAM sites must alerted if friendly aircraft are operating inside their engagement envelope to avoid accidental downings. Finally, communication between the various radar installations and higher command authorities is vital since detections must be passed on before appropriate targeting orders can be disseminated. In theory this system works fine unless it becomes overloaded, something which did not happen during the Iran-Iraq war. Once too many things start happening simultaneously, a centralized system loses its ability to deal with individual threats. This type of system has a built in resiliency and can withstand a fair amount of body blows. However, only one blow to the head is needed to paralyzed the entire system. Knocking out the central command authority essentially isolates the component parts making them susceptible to systematic destruction. Iraqi air defenses were about to be put to the ultimate test. Saddam Hussein, by invading the tiny kingdom of Kuwait in 1990, unleashed the most sophisticated aerial armada ever assembled. A coalition of over thirty nations gathered under United Nations' auspices to oppose this blatant case of Iraqi aggression. When the air war over Iraq began on 17 January 1991, a knock out blow was exactly what the Coalition strategists had in mind. OPERATION DESERT SHIELD So overwhelming were the assembled Iraqi forces, the conquest of Kuwait basically took an afternoon. By halting his army at the Kuwait's southern border with Saudi Arabia, Hussein committed his first and perhaps greatest strategic blunder of the war. Had he continued into Saudi Arabia, a major U.S. deployment into the region may well have proved impossible. Without bases in Saudi Arabia, the Coalition would have been hard pressed to find a suitable staging area for its build up. In a secluded basement wing of the Pentagon, the most respected members of our military establishment met in the late 1980s to discuss contemporary aspects of the Air-Land Battle doctrine. Designed to meet NATO's operational needs in western Europe, the tactical concepts were being studied for their relevance in potential Third World hot spots. The officers taking part in this super-secret think tank were referred to as the Jedi Knights. The Air Force contingent of this interservice round table was known as Project Checkmate. Checkmate's job was to prepare a deployment and logistics study to support a major air effort in the Persian Gulf. This hypothetical campaign plan was given the numerical designation 1002-90. "Ten-Oh-Two" called for deployment of F-15Es to the Gulf on the first day of the operation. Heavy ground forces would need at least thirty days to deploy and until they arrived the F-15s would have to hold the line. When the invasion of Kuwait became a reality in August 1990, it was a simple matter for the Jedi Knights to dig up 1002-90. Initially the overall strategy was merely defensive, a measured response designed to deter Iraq from invading the weak Gulf states on the Arabian peninsula. Now, with Hussein's forces digging in at the Kuwaiti border, the strategy was shifting to a more offensive stance. If economic sanctions and strategic bombing were not persuasive enough, Hussein's forces would have to be ejected from Kuwait by a ground campaign. Should that become necessary, air power had to be on hand to minimize Coalition casualties. F-15E squadrons from the 4th Fighter Wing based at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, North Carolina, began their deployment as scripted in 1002-90. Fresh from their victory in the Air Force's Long Rifle competition, these squadrons made the flight to Tabuk, Saudi Arabia in 14 hours. Eventually all F-15Es would wind up at Al Kharg air base, south of Riyadh. Affectionately known as Al's Garage, this brand new facility was comparable if not better than what they had left behind. "INSTANT THUNDER" The air campaign ( Instant Thunder revolved around a single list of targets, or Air Tasking Order (ATO). The ATO is similar in many respects to a football team whose playbook for the entire season must be laid out in advance. When conducting a major air operation such as Instant Thunder, assembling the plays can become a Herculean task. The first several days of the operation, for example, required an ATO over 300 pages in length. As the air war progressed, a 300 page ATO would become required on average for every 24 hours of air operations. Architect of Instant Thunder's ATO was Lt. General Charles "Chuck" Horner. Gen. Horner had been appointed by Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf to head up the Coalition's unified air forces. Assisting him in targeting assignments was Brigadier General Buster C. Glosson. Glosson and his team of professional targeteers (fraggers) had the responsibility of developing a systematic approach to the air campaign. These men, along with their staffs, occupied a hastily refurbished storage area in the Royal Saudi Air Force Headquarters off Abdul Aziz Boulevard in Riyadh. Within walking distance of the RSAF complex was a soccer field belonging to the U.S. Military Training Mission. Located on this playing field were a number of pre-fab buildings. Inside one of these was a confined work area made up of eight cubicles underneath a 1 5x30 foot tent. It was from this spartan work station, known as the "Black Hole' that all the targeting data for Instant Thunder would be assimilated and processed. Targets were initially gathered by "national technical means" a now familiar euphemism for satellite intelligence. Once these targets were defined and passed on to the Black Hole, the ATO prioritized them in a proper sequence. Specific aircraft and ordnance could then be assigned by Horner's fraggers to eliminate each target in a predetermined manner. This aerial ballet was choreographed to make the most out of each aircraft and its weapon systems. Instant Thunder was designed with specific campaign objectives in mind. Obviously not all targets in the Kuwaiti Theater of Operations (KTO) could be hit simultaneously, so priorities were established which grouped similar targets into campaign phases. Each of these phases were designed to compliment each other as the campaign progressed. In this manner subsequent phases could build on the success of the preceding strikes. OPERATION DESERT STORM On l7 January l991 at approximately O045 hours, F-15Es belonging to the 4th TFW and over a hundred other tactical aircraft were flushed from AI's Garage. Less than two hours later, strategic bombing of Iraq commenced. Operation Desert Shield had turned into a Desert Storm. Over 1,400 sorties were staged over Iraq in the first twenty-four hours of the war. For the next forty days and forty nights, Iraq would be exposed to a biblical torrent of bombs, rockets, and missiles. INSTANT THUNDER PHASE 1 The first phase of the air campaign required the Coalition to disrupt Iraq's air defense system by knocking out communication facilities. The radar "eyes" of the network would also be struck in the first wave so subsequent strikes could go undetected. Certain GCIs, especially in the western desert, were particularly important. Even before the first raids began, Special Forces teams were inserted by MH-53J Pave Low helicopters to assist air attacks from the ground. These teams designated targets using hand held lasers. Apache AH-64s and A-10 Thunderbolts destroyed the radar sites and opened up detection-free corridors into Iraq's interior. Of course, the F-117 Nighthawk Stealth fighters needed no such corridor. These aircraft apparently worked as advertised although there were at least two recorded incidents of ground radar detection, one Iraqi and one British. Even so, F-117s performed the difficult missions over Baghdad without a single loss. High priority Command, Control, Communication and Intelligence (C31) targets in Baghdad were struck at the outset with precision guided munitions (PGMs). Later, the media would receive videotape footage taken from the initial strike. One scene showed a 2,000 lb. GBU-27 being guided down a ventilation shaft in Iraq's Air Defense Ministry. Courtesy of the stranded CNN reporters in Baghdad Al Rashid Hotel, the world got a play-by-play account of the first night's raid over the capitol. Although Saddam Hussein was not directly targeted per se, as the commander of Iraq's military forces he was obviously part of its C31 that the Coalition wished to disrupt. As a general rule it is never necessary to specifically target the leadership as individuals. But, if the leadership can be prevented from communicating with its forces, the net effect is the same. In this first phase, likely command centers we retargeted . If Hussein happened to be caught in one, so be it. Tomahawk cruise missiles or Tactical Land Attack Missile-C (TLAM) were fired from Navy vessels, including the submerged Los Angeles class submarine, the USS Louisville. These attacks made up a significant portion of the first day's strikes. Over 100 of these million dollar missiles were fired during the first 24 hours but only at targets requiring a great degree of precision, i.e. targets located in civilian areas, near schools, hospitals, etc. The missiles were also used against heavily defended targets to minimize exposure of manned aircraft to hostile fire. This initial phase of the air campaign was crucial. While there was little question concerning who would ultimately win the war, this first phase of the air campaign would decide the price of victory. Iraq was hopelessly outclassed but it could still extract a heavy price. STRATEGIC TARGETS Although the principal reason for the Gulf War was to eject Iraq from Kuwait, destruction of Iraq's nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) capability was equally important. Under the glare of world attention, Iraq was found to have quite an advanced weapons program. According to prewar estimates Iraq had been anywhere from eight months to two years away from having a working nuclear device. Post-war revelations have showed how little we actually knew about Iraq's nuclear weapons program. U.N. inspectors traveling through Iraq after the war uncovered whole facilities left untouched by the bombing. Iraq's nuclear weapons program had been dispersed throughout the country following the Israeli strike at Osirak in June l981. The Osirak strike and mysterious deaths of key Iraqi technicians had set the Iraqi program back years. Ironically, the Israeli strike was composed of F-16s with F-15s assigned as fighter escorts. Ten years later, the roles were reversed during Desert Storm. F-15s delivered laser-guided bombs on Iraqi facilities while F-16s flew escort. Had the Osirak complex not been hit, it is entirely possible that the Coalition might have been facing an Iraqi military in possession of one or more nuclear devices. After the Israeli strike, the Tigris and Euphrates rivers became dotted with NBC complexes. The greatest concentration of these sites lay near Baghdad north along the Tigris to Mosul and Kirkuk. This area was chosen undoubtedly because it was considered safe from internal unrest by the Ba'athist regime. Not only were Republican Guard units stationed there but Saddam Hussein had family ties in this region. Born near Tikrit, just north of Baghdad, Hussein's political and religious connections were strongest in this area. Also included in this first phase were strikes directed against Iraqi electric power facilities, the transportation network and oil industry. Reportedly, much of the electric grid was knocked out by Tomahawks missiles releasing spools of wire made of carbon fibers. The wire would float to earth to lay across power lines causing short circuits. (Other reports hint at Tomahawk missiles releasing confetti- like material to produce the same results.) When the cease-fire went into effect Iraq was left with only 15% of its prewar electricity remaining. With the civilian power grid knocked off line, the military was forced to crank up its generators. This had an added benefit for FLIR equipped aircraft searching out targets in populated areas. Military complexes radiating heat stuck out like sore thumbs against dark backgrounds. Coalition aircraft were particularly effective against Iraq's transportation network. Because the country is conveniently divided by two major rivers, bridges were lucrative targets for several reasons. Many bridges over the Tigris and Euphrates contained fiber-optic communication lines. A break in a bridge would mean a break in communications. Secondly, all military traffic and supplies had to cross at least one of these unfordable rivers on the way into Kuwait. Once these spans were dropped, the troops in Kuwait were effectively isolated. Not only could military traffic be prevented from crossing, congestion at these downed bridges would present Coalition pilots with concentrated targets. Having damaged Iraq's principal means of C31, the air campaign could now direct its energy towards destroying Iraq's air force. This could be accomplished either on the ground or in the air but the preferred method was of course, to destroy them on the ground where they posed no threat. With this in mind, F-15Es and F-117As began a series of strikes on the hardened aircraft shelters. When Iraqi pilots did manage to get airborne they were immediately detected by AWACS and engaged by F-15s. The fact that Saddam had the chief of his air force taken out and shot is but one indication of the Coalition's effectiveness. Strikes directed against the Iraqi air force continued throughout the campaign even though air superiority had been achieved early on. Declaring air superiority over Iraq became a matter of splitting hairs with the media over semantics. Did we have air superiority or was it air supremacy? No matter what name you gave it, Coalition pilots owned the sky over Iraq and the hardened shelters proved incapable of protecting enemy aircraft on the ground. With no other way to save themselves, Iraqi pilots began flying their aircraft to Iranian airfields. More than anything else, these desperate flights to Iran demonstrated that the Coalition had won the air war over Iraq. INSTANT THUNDER PHASE 2 INSTANT THUNDER PHASE 4 After Iraq's key targets and installations were struck, emphasis shifted towards establishing air superiority over the Kuwaiti Theater of Operations or KTO. This second phase called for numerous ground strikes against mobile SAM and triple-A sites stationed with Iraqi units in the field. These sites were not tied into the national defense scheme but were intended to protect maneuver units. By attacking these assets, Iraq's air defense umbrella was stripped away prior to the start of the ground war. When the ground war commenced these units were completely open and vulnerable to close air support missions. INSTANT THUNDER PHASE 3 The third phase of the air war began after Iraq's ability to interfere with tactical air support missions was eliminated. Known as "shaping the battlefield" this phase concentrated on attacking various ground targets supporting enemy troops at the front. F-15s were called upon to eliminate logistic support centers and disrupt supply traffic heading to Iraqi troops at the front. In Vietnam the USAF had been unable to accomplish this mission to the degree necessary. The jungle cover had made the job of detecting enemy supplies coming down the Ho Chi Minh trail far too difficult. The North Vietnamese were also able to capitalize on the fact that U.S. aircraft were unable to "see" at night. The unsophisticated nature of their forces required far less supply to maintain his combat operations. NVA "beans and bullets" resupply operations could easily be transported on the backs of individual soldiers. The Gulf War was an entirely different situation. Not only were supply routes traced over desert terrain (hence very little overhead cover) but these routes could be effectively interdicted by destroying only a few bridges. Moreover, the Iraqi army in Kuwait was highly mechanized and required huge amounts of supply just to survive, let alone maintain combat readiness. Unlike Vietnam, Iraqi logistics were given no respite at night either. Ground surveillance went on around the clock and anything that moved was attacked. Although by now a significant portion of F-15E missions were Scud hunts, Strike Eagles also assisted in the final phase of the air campaign, direct ground support. To aid the F-15s, Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System aircraft (J-STARS) could look deep into Iraq and "see" enemy ground activity. If the enemy moved, J-STARS instantly detected it and F-15s would pounce on it. Movement on the ground ultimately proved fatal. Faced with no alternative, Iraqi ground troops simply dug deeper and in so doing planted the seeds of their own destruction. During this phase of the air campaign, F-15Es were spared from other duties and assigned to nightly "tank-plinking" missions. The dug-in Iraqi armor was now helpless, unable to move and unable to hide, even at night. The LANTIRN equipped Eagles swooped in and destroyed the armored vehicles one after another. A new chapter was being written in the history of air combat. As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Colin L. Powell had stated, the strategy was first to, "cut the Iraqi army off, and then kill it." Airpower had made it possible. The war had been so one-sided that after 100 hours it had to be called off, the other side was leaving the field. Iraq's army had been broken by incessant bombing and was reduced to an unwashed rabble fleeing Kuwait. THE GREAT SCUD HUNT Even though the Coalition won the war convincingly in a very short time, it was not without its share of surprises. One of these surprises had been the mass exodus of the Iraqi air force to Iran. Far more deadly, however, was the surprise awaiting the Coalition as evening came on the third day of the war. True to his word, Saddam Hussein unleashed a salvo of Scud ballistic missiles at Israel and Saudi Arabia. The Coalition had been lulled into a false sense of security by its own glowing press accounts of the battle. So it came as somewhat of a shock that after suffering two nights of heavy aerial bombardment, Iraq proved it could take back the initiative. It had retained the ability to launch ballistic missiles and influence the course of the war. The Coalition's worst nightmare was coming true. The Scud campaign was one of the most controversial aspects of the war. Clearly there had been a pre-war intelligence failure to detect the existence of so many mobile launchers and missiles. Initially, intelligence sources figured Iraq possessed around 36 mobile launchers but with the beginning of the air campaign, Coalition pilots began placing the number of launchers in the hundreds. Because the Coalition had so poorly estimated the number of launchers, little effort was devoted toward destroying them at first. It wasn't until after Scuds began striking Israel that the anti-Scud campaign began in earnest. By then it was too late. the launchers were well dispersed and tucked away. In terms of combat efficiency, the military threat posed by Scud missiles was insignificant. With only inertial guidance and small payload, the missile has evolved very little from its first generation cousin, Germany's V-2 rocket. It is designed to provide tactical support at ranges greater than conventional artillery but without active guidance the Scud is simply aimed in the direction of the target. At a pre-set time the missile's engine is turned off causing it to nose over and detonate on impact. Once launched the missile's flight trajectory cannot be altered. In many respects it is not much brighter than a child's bottle-rocket. The missile is fired with range and bearing information only giving it a Circular Error Probability (CEP) that is measured in thousands of feet. To be effective, the Scud requires a large stationary target like a city. Iraq had modified its inventory of Scud missiles by dramatically increasing their range. The two new versions of Scud missiles were named Al-Hussein and AlAbbas. With increased range however, came a decrease in payload and accuracy. Hussein's missiles now had even less military value than before. They were meant only to be weapons of terror to be used against civilians. Because the warhead could contain only a small amount of high explosive the real fear was that these modified missiles might contain chemical payloads. During the Gulf War Scud missiles played a role which far outweighed their military importance. Lacking an air force to strike back, firing off Scud missiles showed the world that Iraq could survive the best efforts of the Coalition. But the indiscriminate launching of Scud missiles had an even more sinister purpose. Hussein hoped to use his missiles as a political ploy to drag Israel into the war. In contrast to the reluctance concerning declaration of air superiority, Coalition briefers seemed willing to state early on that the Scud threat had been dealt with. Israeli civilians breathed a cautious sigh of relief at the news. When sirens all across the country began wailing, the early optimism turned to panic. Scud missiles were headed for the state of Israel after all. One could only guess at their contents. For Hussein, striking Israel was a win-win stratagem regardless of what Israel's response might be. Israel certainly could not add to the damage already being inflicted on his country and he could portray himself as a hero to the Arab people by attacking the Jewish state. Hussein was gambling that Arab sensitivities would cause them to withdraw from the Coalition, not wanting to appear to be aiding Israel in the destruction of another Arab nation. It cost him little while placing all kinds of diplomatic pressure on the U.S. and its allies. For Israel, a nation which prides itself on its military prowess, it was a political embarrassment. It was forced to accept help from foreign troops on its soil for the first time in its history. Israel had built a reputation based on its policy of quick and decisive retaliation when attacked. Israel had two retaliatory options immediately available. It could launch its own air strikes backed up by division-sized commando raids into western Iraq; or it could launch Jericho I missiles at Baghdad and return the favor. It chose to do neither at the request of the United States. For political reasons it was forced to absorb the Iraqi blows and bide its time. The great hunt for Scud missile launchers was literally equivalent to searching for the proverbial "needle in the haystack " U.S. intelligence had seriously underestimated the number of mobile launchers available in Iraq. Fixed sites were more readily detected by satellite photography but mobile launchers presented a problem. Little more than a pickup truck with a launch rail on the back, mobile launchers could easily be disguised or hidden. Often times the Scud launchers would only be detected after they had launched their missile. Once a missile was launched, it would become a matter of tracking the mobile launchers back to their hiding places. Great use was also made of Special-Forces teams placed well behind enemy lines. Special Forces teams in sophisticated dune-buggies were able to pinpoint Scud locations with hand-held lasers and then call in F-15s with devastating accuracy. It was estimated that the effort to find and eliminate the launchers cost the Coalition approximately one week's worth of sorties. F-15Es with their Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting Infrared for Night (LANTIRN) laser-designating pods became major players. In fact, over half of all F15E missions flown during Desert Storm were directed against the mobile Scud launchers. The F-15E flew approximately 2,200 sorties with only two combat losses. Both aircraft were lost while hunting Scud launchers in western Iraq. Despite the difficulties. Scud launchings were dramatically curtailed after the first two weeks of the campaign. By the end of the second week, 43 had been launched. Iraq was only able to launch six more during the whole third week as the anti-Scud effort gathered steam. F- 15Es could only do so much, however. To be effective Coalition pilots would almost have to know in advance where the missiles were located. As the war progressed, the number of missile launches did in fact drop off appreciably. Whether this was due to Coalition efforts or because the Iraqis were running out of missiles is not clear. There is anecdotal evidence to support both theories. One thing is certain. Scuds continued to fall on Israel and Saudi Arabia right until the end of the war. Although each Arab member of the Coalition reaffirmed its commitment to the Coalition, who really knows what the outcome might have been if Israel had responded? Overflights may have driven Jordan and Israel to the brink of war. Syria, whose troops had occupied Lebanon while everyone's attention was on Iraq, might well have pulled out of the coalition. President Assad may have decided that Syria had already gotten as much out of the war as it was likely to get. Taking a long term view of the situation Syria's geopolitical interests might have been better served by making amends with Iraq. LEADERSHIP An important reason for the success of Desert Storm was the defeat in Vietnam. Since the Vietnam War a generation of military leadership has had time to reflect upon those mistakes. Many of Desert Storm's top leaders were junior officers back then. Coming up through the ranks they got a first hand look at the effects of mismanagement and failed policy. From the President on, military leaders felt obliged to reassure the American public that this war would not be another Vietnam. The biggest mistake made during the Vietnam War was to commit military forces without widespread domestic support for the conflict. Rather than being a force for national unity like World War II, the Vietnam War was divisive. This "Vietnam syndrome," the idea that Americans are reluctant to use force fearing domestic unrest, has plagued our national psychology since 1972. Military leaders wanted Desert Storm to put this notion to rest once and for all. Although some factions within the United States differed on the sanctions question, an overwhelming majority of Americans supported the President's action once war was underway. With the nation solidly behind the men in uniform, America proved its people still had the will to fight if necessary. COMMAND AND CONTROL The Coalition air campaign was an extremely complex undertaking. Imagine trying to efficiently manage the combined air assets of a multi- national force, each nation having different types of aircraft with different arming and maintenance requirements. Consider scheduling missions utilizing all these various aircraft in concert, all flying at different altitudes and speeds, in all kinds of weather, day and night. Remember that all these operations are taking place in a relatively confined space and you are quickly able to visualize an air traffic controller's nightmare. Oh yes, add in one last minor detail, the fact that there is a war on and you begin to get an idea of the magnitude of the job. The amazing success of the air campaign came without a single incident of blue on blue air loss (fratricide). This fact alone is a testament to the professionalism of the Coalition air forces. The campaign could not have happened if not for the extraordinary amount of planning and preparation that went into organizing the effort. Much of this planning took the form of Pentagon staffers creating hypothetical war scenarios and identifying possible problems well in advance. IRANIAN EXODUS The Iraqi decision to send its top of the line aircraft to Iran was puzzling to Western analysts. There was speculation in the press that Saddam Hussein was husbanding his aircraft for later use in some type of surge operation. Others believed that the Iraqi aircraft based in Iran would be used to outflank U S naval groups in the Persian Gulf. Their wild theories just go to prove that reporters make for lousy tacticians. (In fairness to the profession it should be pointed out that most generals would probably make lousy reporters ) The fact that Iraqi aircraft were placing themselves farther away from the battlefield by fleeing to Iran doesn't seem to have made much of an impression. The optimal time for Iraq to have employed its air power was at the outset; in the first few days of the campaign when its integrated air defense system was still relatively intact. With each passing day, hundreds of Coalition sorties were gradually destroying Iraq's ability to coordinate its air effort. The military analysts here at MicroProse theorize that between the second and third week of the campaign Hussein accepted the destruction of his air force as a foregone conclusion. Faced with this inevitability, we believe Hussein engaged in a bit of Machiavellian "realpolitik" and cut a deal with his former enemy. Perhaps having no alternative, Hussein may have decided to offer the aircraft to Iran as an added inducement to Iranian leaders not to stir up trouble among Iraq's Shiite population in the south. Conspiracy theorists will undoubtedly have a field day with this after tiring of JFK. In the absence of any other compelling reason to emerge since the war, this seems to be the most likely explanation. The aircraft transfer may have also been intended to curry favor with the Iranian leadership with whom he still shared a lengthy border. To free troops stationed along that border, he had already given back territory taken in the Iran-lraq war. The aircraft may have been further insurance against Iranian activity against his regime. NBC CONSIDERATIONS Once the initial suppression of Iraqi air defenses was considered accomplished, Coalition strikes began to target nuclear! chemical and biological (NBC) facilities. There was little fear that Iraq was in a position to use nuclear weapons during the conflict since Coalition strategists were reasonably certain that Iraq did not possess an operational device in 1991. The real fear was that Iraq might pull out of Kuwait and end the conflict before giving the Coalition an opportunity to destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. For this reason, nuclear facilities were placed high on the list. Over five hundred sorties were used to strike 31 nuclear-related targets during the first few days of the air campaign. Chemical and biological weapons were a different matter entirely. Iraq was known to possess stocks of chemical weapons, having previously used them on its own Kurdish population. Politically it was necessary to rapidly eliminate chemical weapon manufacturing centers as well as delivery systems. While the Coalition military forces were adequate trained and equipped to deal with chemicals, civilian populations were totally exposed. And after publicly threatening to burn half of Israel, no one doubted Hussein's intentions in this regard. Iraqi chemical and biological weapons facilities were apparently disguised as fertilizer and pharmaceutical manufacturing plants. The trick is an old but effective one. Foreign contractors from one nation are called to construct a legitimate facility. Upon completion, the complex can then be converted for military use by contractors from a different country. This same shell game construction was used by Libya in the 1980s to disguise its chemical weapon production COLLATERAL DAMAGE AND CIVILIAN CASUALTIES The Vietnam-era specter of civilian casualties was again quite evident in the daily briefing from both Riyadh and Pentagon. It was clear that the spokesmen were conscious of the effect Iraqi civilian deaths would have on domestic support for the war. But beyond that was a sincere expression of regret and anguish over civilian deaths being caused by the bombing. Most officials went on at length about the precautions taken to minimize collateral damage. Mind you! many of these added restrictions exposed our pilots to greater risk. Despite pilot restrictions and the high degree of precision obtained by our "smart" weapons, collateral damage did occur in isolated incidents. The military infrastructure was too interwoven within Iraqi society to prevent it entirely. Yet considering the amount of ordnance dropped on the country, civilian casualties were light. Naturally the Iraqi government did everything within its power to magnify the extent of damage done in civilian areas. These efforts included documented cases of intentional damage done by Iraq to its own structures. Another fact which seems to have escaped most civilian observers is that the nightly fireworks display that Iraqi gunners were putting up over Baghdad was coming back down on their heads. The metal fragments and debris being created by all those exploding shells must have made venturing outdoors quite hazardous. Iraqi civilians population had been expecting massive damage to occur in their residential areas. They were somewhat surprised after months of mental preparation that it did not happen. Anticipating air raids like those which took place during the London "blitz" in 1940, they were confused over the selective nature of our air strikes. Rather than demoralize or impress the average Iraqi, the population became enraged over air strikes they believed to be conducted out of sheer spitefulness. One particular case of 'civilian" damage which drew much media attention was the celebrated "Baby Milk Factory" at Abu Ghraib. The Baby Milk Factory story was first reported by the Iraqi government then picked up the international press. It involved an Iraqi facility involved in the production of biological weapons which had been destroyed in pin-point bombing. Iraq stated that the plant actually produced infant formula and condemned the Coalition for trying to deprive Iraqi children of their milk. To complete the charade, Iraqi TV showed workers picking through the debris dressed in smocks labeled "BABY MILK FACTORY" written in English. It was a hilarious scam but sadly, some in this country were completely taken in by it. After the war a respected journalist was allowed to "tour" the site. His hosts invited him to sample some pure white residue neatly piled in the midst of this building which had been devastated in the air strike. Well sure enough, it was powdered baby milk. Gee, it must have been a "Baby Milk Factory" after all. Admittedly, some mistakes were made. A Defense Department analyst has since concluded that at least 50 out of the 800 strategic targets struck during the war were hit because of faulty intelligence. Not that each of these 50 resulted in civilian casualties, just that these targets were misidentified by U.S. intelligence prior to the war. THE AMARIYA SHEUER A campaign of this magnitude simply could not have been conducted without at least a few things going wrong. An intelligence failure was responsible for what would become Iraq's biggest propaganda windfall of the war, the destruction of the Amariya bomb shelter. Otherwise known as Department of Civil Defense Public Shelter #25, the Amariya shelter in the suburbs of Baghdad was used by Iraq's upper class, government officials and their families. Unfortunately, it was also being used as a communications center by the military. Built initially during the Iran-Iraq war as a bomb shelter, the Amiriya shelter was subsequently converted into an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) hardened communications facility. In the war of words which followed the attack, U S officials were quick to point out that the facility had been fenced i n with barbed-wire and camouflaged. Fences and armed guards are not what one would rationally expect to find outside of a civilian bomb shelter. The Amiriya command center had been identified as a possible target and placed on the ATO early in the campaign. When Iraq's principal means of communication broke down, the shelter was activated as a secondary command node. Tragically, what the Black Hole fraggers did not know was that the facility was doubling as a civilian bomb shelter at night. On 12 February 1991 at 0430 hours, a single F-117A sent two 2,000 lb. laser-guided smart bombs crashing through the camouflaged roof of the structure. Penetrating the hardened concrete ceiling, the bombs detonated several floors down. Instantly killed in the blast were between 300 and 400 Iraqi civilians. The removal of their remains was broadcast live over Iraqi and U.S. television the next day. An example of an equipment failure took place less than two days later during a raid on the bridge over the Euphrates river at Fallujah. Many Iraqi civilians were reportedly killed when a laser guided "smart bomb" proved not to be so smart and landed in a crowded marketplace. On 14 February, a RAF Tornado struck the bridge being laser designated by an RAF Buccaneer. One bomb failed to guide properly and landed some 800 yards east of the actual aiming point. Subsequent reports of at least 130 dead could not be confirmed. The heavy! continuous bombing in the aftermath of these two incidents was beginning to generate sympathy for Iraq. The perception was that we were now merely "bouncing the rubble" and causing needless civilian suffering. International concern was growing that the U.S. was exceeding its U.N. mandate and destroying the country. It is notable that countries expressing the most concern were located the farthest away from Saddam. Very little compassion was being shown by Iraq's neighbors because perhaps they knew something the rest of the world didn't. In a long war such as Vietnam, losing the propaganda battle had been our undoing. Collateral damage done to North Vietnam had led to charges that the U.S. was guilty of genocide. Clearly, the Iraqi leadership had studied the legacy of our involvement in Vietnam. By selectively showing damage to civilian residential areas, the Iraqi government was making use of its only truly effective weapon against our air campaign. Hussein was gambling that elements within our own society would force a premature cessation of the bombing campaign. Had the ground war not been so decisive, Hussein may have ultimately been proven right. GULF WAR COMMENTARY Now you must be the thunder and lightning behind Desert Storm." --General Norman H. Schwarzkopf Although MicroProse's F-15E Strike Eagle 111 is intended to simulate the contributions of a single aircraft, much of the design effort went into developing an accurate campaign environment. It was evident from the start that the Iraq scenario would have to take into account the larger context of air power in general. If nothing else, it may give you something to think about while seated in your cockpit on those long missions over Baghdad. Desert Shield/Storm was such an anomalous event that it defies critical analysis in many respects. However, as the next millennium looms near, it will inevitably be studied as a model for conducting 21st century warfare. In the short time that has elapsed since the actual event, much has been written trying to place the war in proper historical perspective. The same people who before the war were predicting chemical devastation and horrendous American casualties are now writing post-war critiques. It is safe to say that most civilian writers are as far off now as they were before the war. By focusing on the sensational, they have missed the obvious. F-15E missions did not just occur in a vacuum and in fact the whole theory behind the use of air power underwent a radical reevaluation during Desert Storm. Coalition pilots came close to realizing the dream of all air enthusiasts since Giulio Douhet wrote his treatise, The Command of the A r, in 1921. For the first time in history an entire nation was being defeated by men attacking from the air. Having said that, it is important to realize the danger in making definitive conclusions based on our experience in Desert Storm. While the Persian Gulf conflict contained universal elements common to all wars, Desert Storm was an event unlikely to be repeated. For one thing, the Coalition faced an enemy which by the stupidity of its leaders, cooperated in its own destruction. The ineptitude of Saddam Hussein on a strategic level was astounding. Any operational analysis based on performance in Desert Storm is bound to be misleading if used to portend future conflicts. Currently there is an ongoing debate within military circles over the effectiveness of the strategic air campaign, i e hitting targets within Iraq. While the efficacy of the tactical air support is not disputed, the necessity of bombing all those strategic targets is being criticized. The central point of the argument is that the Iraqi army collapsed as a result of direct airstrikes and that the effort spent on hitting strategic targets was wasted. Furthermore, air assets utilized in the strategic campaign would have had a far greater effect had they been used in a tactical support role from day one. Lastly, and perhaps the salient point of the discussion is that the strategic bombing campaign had little correlation to the eventual outcome of the war. Advocates of this position make valid points. Obviously, seeing your unit pounded into dust by tactical bombing will have a greater effect on morale than concern over targets being hit far off behind the lines. Troops at the front might even take some comfort in knowing that not everything is going to be thrown at them. The counter to this argument is that the Gulf War provided the United States and its allies the chance to eliminate Iraq's potential to build nuclear weapons. By degrading the overall military infrastructure the Coalition was also seeking to redress an imbalance of power in the region. These reasons were at least as important as forcing the Iraqi army out of Kuwait. The strategic campaign against Iraq fulfilled a dual role that could be achieved no other way. There is an old maxim which goes, we learn the most from our mistakes . But as human beings, we have a tendency to stick to what works with the attitude if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Military planners are caught somewhere in the middle. On the one hand, it is hard to argue against success, but if the past has taught us anything, it is that no war is ever fought like the last. History books are filled with examples of nations being defeated because they used tactics carried over from the previous conflict. The Gulf War is no different in this respect. The strategies and tactics used successfully by the Coalition will ultimately have a short shelf life. Most of the lessons learned during the war will be recognized in time as unique to this conflict. Over 100,000 combat sorties were flown in support of Operation Desert Storm. Only 28 U.S. fixed-wing aircraft were lost for an unbelievably low attrition rate of 0.03%. A rate this low is unlikely to be matched in any future conflict. In the Desert Storm scenario, you will be called upon to perform many of the missions actually conducted during the war. Seated in your F- 15E at Al Kharg, you and your "Wizzo" will have one last chance to go over the upcoming mission. On route to the target a myriad of technical sensors and electronic devices are working automatically to make your missions go smoothly. Still, success will depend in large degree upon your piloting skill. The focus of your missions will be delivering ordnance on a variety of Iraqi targets, both strategic and tactical in nature. This is not to say that the air to air threat is missing, it isn't. The few Iraqi planes that do manage to get off the ground are usually flown by their top pilots. Even though they are Iraqi and not Soviet pilots, a MiG-29 is a MiG-29. You fly the plane, let your Wizzo lock 'em up. Certain missions require that you go "downtown" into the heart of Baghdad and the heaviest concentration of triple-A in the Gulf region. Other missions, such as interdiction strikes on roads and bridges are less risky but no less demanding. Scuds remain a priority target. Anti-Scud patrols may be less glamorous than streaking over Baghdad but you F 15 OVER BAGDAD already know how important these missions are. You may not get them all but every Scud site or launcher you knock out is one less Saddam can use to terrorize innocent civilians. How's that for job satisfaction? One final word about ground strikes. Even though your ordnance consists of precision guided munitions, accidents do happen. Central Command is counting on you to be extremely careful when delivering ordnance. You have already read how collateral damage is used by the enemy to wage a propaganda war back home. Don't make Hussein's job any easier. Avoiding civilian casualties and limiting collateral damage are paramount issues. Even if it means taking the long way towards a target, avoid extended flights over major residential areas where possible. FUTURE MILITARY CONFRONTATION The extent of Iraq's nuclear program is still being uncovered more than a year after the Gulf War. United Nations inspection teams continue to turn up elements of the program which were untouched by the war. Even more disturbing is Iraq's refusal to allow inspection teams access to certain facilities labeled as "agricultural plants." Given what we know about Iraq's elaborate deceptions, it should come as no surprise that documents relating to nuclear weapons production are stored in the Agriculture Ministry. By standing up to the United Nations, Hussein will once again win the propaganda war even if Iraq suffers retaliatory damage. This time the United States will be unable to restrain Israel and ground combat in western Iraq will likely ensue. Unfortunately, the only way this crisis will probably be resolved is by the death of Saddam Hussein, natural or otherwise. The Middle East is a powder-keg even on a good day without having to deal with an unstable despot in command of nuclear weapons. A resumption of this conflict is likely to follow a far different pattern than the previous campaign. The United States will once again rely on airstrikes against Iraqi production facilities and military installations. As before, wholesale military occupation of Iraq will be impractical even if sufficient ground forces remained in theater. Strategic bombing will once again become the UN's only viable leverage over the Iraqi warlord. After having agreed to permit Iraqi helicopter flights during the cease-fire negotiations, on 27 August 1992 at 1015 hrs (EST) the UN imposed a "No-fly Zone" over Iraq south of the 32nd parallel. Continued Iraqi human rights abuses against rebellious Shi'ites in southern Iraq had proven to be an embarrassment to the U.S administration. The post-war bungling that allowed Hussein to massacre and make refugees out of tens of thousands of Kurds would not be repeated. The Shi'ite population is centered in salt-marsh areas south of Basra. Unable to reach them on the ground, the Iraqi military began using the remnants of its air power to strike at them. With the institution of a No-Fly Zone, the U S and its allies are effectively providing an active CAP over southern Iraq. Until now, Iraq has not sought to challenge U S aircraft south of the parallel. There have been a few exceptions, however, mainly lone MiGs intentionally straying close to the Zone. Should a major violation of the No-Fly Zone occur at some point in the future, F-15s will undoubtedly become involved. The unsurpassed accuracy of the Eagle, coupled with its excellent defensive ability, makes this aircraft the logical choice for payback. PRE-WAR IRAQI ORDER OF BATTLE GROUND UNITS: Regular Ground Forces: 6 Armored divisions, 3 Mechanized Infantry divisions, 1 Naval Infantry division, 10 Motorized Infantry divisions, 17 Infantry divisions, 14 Reserve Infantry divisions, 1 Air Assault Brigade Republican Guards: 2 Armored divisions, 1 Mechanized division, 1 Motorized Infantry division, 3 Infantry divisions, 1 Special Forces division, 2 Surface-to-Surface Missile Brigades (Scud, FROG) Major Equipment: (5500) MBTs T55/62/72, (2000) AFVs BMP, M-113, EE-11 URUTU,BTR50/60/152,(2000)SPA and towed artillery pieces 85/ 100/122/130/152mm. 155GCT SPA. BM-21. ASTROS ll NAVAL UNITS: (1) Training Frigate, (6) Osa 1, (4) Osa ll, (4) ZHUK patrol boats, (3) SO1 patrol boats, (2) Poluchat class patrol Boats, (1) T-43 minesweeper/ layer, (3) Yevgenya class minesweepers, (4) Nestin class minesweepers, (3) Polnocny landing ships, plus several RO-RO cargo vessels AIR FORCE: Major Equipment: (250) MiG-21/23/25/29, (125) SU-7/20/24/25, (100) Miraqe F-1, (12) IL- 76, (40) A-5 Fantan, (80) Jian F6 7, (8) AN-12, (12) AN-26 AIR DEFENSE: Major Equipment: SA-2 316 71819114, Roland Major Equipment F-l5 NEARING KUWAIT CITY WATER TOWERS 11. KOREA: RETURN TO MIG ALLEY SCENARIO HISTORY OF THE "FIRST" KOREAN WAR KIM IL-SUNG INVADES SOUTH KOREA On a sleepy Sunday morning in June 1950, North Korea flung 10 infantry divisions and more than 150 T-34 tanks south across the 38th Parallel into South Korea. In an effort to unite the two countries, the puppet government of Kim ll.-Sung had launched a surprise invasion. Only weeks before, the U.S. State Department had delineated those areas in the Pacific which it considered vital. The fact that South Korea was absent from the list was duly noted by the North Korean communists. Kim was convinced that he need not fear U.S. intervention. Caught unawares by the ferocity of this massive assault the Republic of South Korea (ROK) was devastated. The ROK army was simply ill- equipped to deal with the North Korean armor which spearheaded the offensive. By the end of July, over 40% of the South Korea army had been destroyed. United States ground forces stationed in-country were likewise swept aside. Largely a constabulary force, the troops in Korea had suffered due to budget cuts in the post World War lI demobilization. If South Korea was going to be held it would have be by outside forces. The capital of South Korea, Seoul, was quickly taken by the North Koreans. Being located very near the border the city had little chance to prepare an adequate defense. As the ROK army broke apart and fled south, the United Nations voted to intervene in the conflict. NKPA forces, flushed with success, continued their push southward more concerned with speed rather than their safety. "SPEED BUMPS" U.S. troops were rushed to South Korea hoping to stem the tide but were committed piecemeal. Acting as "speed bumps" to slow the North Korean drive, units of the U.S. 24th Division were sacrificed in the process. By September, the remaining U.S. and South Korean forces were confined to an ever-shrinking slice of the peninsula known as the Pusan perimeter. The USAF, like the army, had been ill-prepared to meet the communist invasion. Nominal control of U.S. aircraft in the region was assigned to the Far Eastern Air Forces or FEAF (rhymes with leaf). In the preceding decade FEAF's only mission had been to provide active air defense for General Douglas MacArthur's ground forces in the Far East Command. Essentially a deterrent force, the FEAF had practiced little of the air to ground operations which it would soon be called on to perform. The U.S. Fifth Air Force, FEAF's largest subordinate command, was stationed in the Japanese home islands. During World War II it had moved north from Australia with the U.S. island-hoping drive across the Pacific. The tactical fighter component of the Fifth Air Force was equipped primarily with F-80C Shooting Stars, F-51 Mustangs and F-82 twin fuselage Mustangs. Two under strength squadrons of B-26s Invaders made up the Fifth Air Force's sole bombardment group. The South Korean Air Force (ROKAF) at the start of the war consisted of 16 prop-driven aircraft and a total of 57 pilots. Only 39 of these 57 pilots were considered fully trained. This meager force was caught and defeated on the ground during the first week of the war by Soviet built IL10s, heirs to the famous Sturmoviks of WW II. The North Korean Air Force then proceeded to place South Korean airfields near Seoul and nearby Suwon under aerial siege. For the second time in nine years, the United States was surprised by a hostile power, attacking on a Sunday when vigilance was low. It showed that the military had apparently learned little from the earlier Pearl Harbor debacle. Despite the general East-West tensions in this era of no-notice atomic oblivion, U.S. forces in the Pacific were taken totally off guard. B-29 Super-fortresses belonging to the Twentieth Air Force were hurriedly re deployed to Japan. These heavy strategic bombers, once in theater, were wasted on tactical support missions such as hunting down individual truck and tank convoys. Direct ground support missions were flown by F-80 and F-82s operating from Japan. Lacking proper antipersonnel ordnance, F-82s would jettison their fuel tanks over enemy troop concentrations as makeshift napalm. INITIAL ATTEMPTS AT INTERDICTION Numerous bridges, railroad marshaling yards, dams and rail tunnels had been attacked by medium altitude bombing. But, the effectiveness of these strikes was open to debate. Since the USAF lacked adequate photo reconnaissance follow-up, bomb damage assessment was difficult. Ground tog and faulty maps certainly had a negative impact on the bombing campaign. As ineffective as these tactics were, they were not completely without success. One of the most deadly air attacks of the war occurred during its first week. On 30 June, a flight of B-26s caught a North Korean column bottle necked at a downed bridge near Seoul. Flying wing-tip to wing-tip the B-26s dropped their entire bomb loads on the trapped column and destroyed hundreds of vehicles. In spite of these sporadic air attacks, North Korean armor remained road bound and presented the Fifth Air Force with excellent targets throughout their offensive. KIMPO AND SUWON AIRFIELDS The hasty retreat of UN and ROK ground forces toward Pusan however, placed the defense of South Korea in jeopardy. The two principal airfields in South Korea, Kimpo and Suwon were overrun early in the war. These two air bases were the only ones with airstrips long enough to support high performance aircraft. The third largest runway in South Korea was far to the south at Pusan. Unfortunately, its 4.900 ft. paved surface was torn up by heavily laden transports bringing in much needed reinforcements. The loss of Kimpo and Suwon forced a re deployment of all jet aircraft to bases in Japan. This had a severe effect on combat operations since the USAF's principal jet fighters had such limited ranges. For example the F80C "Shooting Star" the FEAF's principal fighter, at least in terms of numbers, had a combat radius of only 225 miles. Fuel consumption usually allowed the fighters only 15-20 minutes in a combat area before reaching "Bingo" fuel. With this redeployment of jets taking place, F-51 Mustangs gained a new found prominence. As the commander of the Fifth Air Force put it, "One F-51 adequately supported and fought from Taegu airfield is equivalent to four F-80s based on Kyushu (Japan)." Relying on outdated equipment from the last war might have proved successful had not superior Soviet aircraft been introduced. If control of the skies over South Korea was lost, the UN would be precluded from conducting the air missions which so far had been instrumental in staving off defeat. On a strategic level, the interdiction campaign had been the only means of slowing the flow of communist men and material into South Korea. Losing air superiority would also mean that the North Koreans would be given an opportunity to stage their own air attacks from captured South Korea bases. The Fifth Air Force, recognizing this eventuality, shifted its emphasis from strategic interdiction to counter-air operations. The B- 26s and B-29s which had heretofore been used against troop movements made enemy airfields their primary focus. In a series of devastating raids on North Korean airfields. the bombers forced the North Korean air force to withdraw their into Manchuria. THE PUSAN PERIMETER By August 1950, the NKPA had come perilously close to conquering South Korea in a single lightning campaign. All that stood between North Koreans and victory was the last ditch UN toehold around Pusan. Operating at the end of a tenuous lifeline stretching back to North Korea, it was imperative for the enemy to finish off the Pusan bridgehead before superior UN forces could arrive. For several weeks it appeared that the North Koreans were about to succeed. But the fruits of the interdiction campaign were becoming evident. Manpower and supplies simply could not reach the North Koreans around Pusan in sufficient amounts to allow them to mount the final effort. The amphibious landing at Inchon came at a time when the North Koreans were already on the ropes. Having exhausted themselves in an 1 4 all-out effort to take South Korea, their army lay spent and broken. By the time the Inchon landings took place, UN forces outnumbered the North Koreans along the Pusan perimeter. Contrary to popular belief, the Inchon operation had been preplanned since before the war. The Joint Chiefs of Staff had always intended to conduct a landing at Inchon in opposition to a North Korea drive southwards. The operation, which made a certain general famous, took place in September. Despite tricky currents and tides, the Marines gained a foothold and turned the tide of battle. Seoul was retaken by U.S. Marines and suddenly the North Koreans down south seemed desperately overextended. As news of the Inchon landings filtered down to the North Koreans along the perimeter their morale finally gave way. Subjected to terrible bombing and lacking supplies, the North Koreans were routed . MacArthur's mishandling of the counter-offensive had allowed a good portion of the NKPA to escape but without question the UN was in position to occupy North Korea at its leisure. UN ground troops closed in on the Yalu River border with China as winter drew near. MacArthur was insistent that China would not enter the fray and U.S. troops began looking forward to being home in time for Christmas. They had inflicted a disastrous defeat upon the enemy and considered the campaign concluded. Well, MacArthur was wrong. CHINESE INTERVENTION The Chinese had surreptitiously deployed over 300,000 "volunteers" inside North Korea by November 1950. After repeatedly warning the U.N. to stay away from the Yalu, China had decided to intervene in the conflict. Their massive armies tore into U U.S. units in the midst of their Thanksgiving celebrations. Their action saved the North Koreans from certain defeat and flung the UN forces fleeing headlong back into South Korea. There are perhaps no more poignant stories in the annals of military history than the saga of the frozen retreat from North Korea. U.S. Army and Marines salvaged what they could and staged a fighting withdraw back down the peninsula. Many units still were cut off by the speed of the Chinese advance and had to be evacuated by sea. For the second time in the war Seoul was taken by the enemy. The Chinese offensive however, had been slowed by USAF bombing just as the North Koreans before. The communists had once again outrun their ability to supply their troops at the front. UN forces were able to establish a firm front along the narrow waist of Korea just south of Seoul. Any further Chinese attacks were met with determined resistance and thrown back; UN counter-attacks were similarly unsuccessful. There were now too many troops on both sides of the lines to make a war of maneuver possible . A maximum effort by the UN had barely managed to retake Seoul and suffered heavy casualties. By July 1951, both sides now recognized that the mobile phase of the Korean war had ended. As the war entered this new phase, the prospects for either side achieving a decisive victory were slim. There were only two choices remaining; either continue the war under conditions reminiscent of World War I or opt for a negotiated settlement. Since the use of atomic weapons would mean an intolerable escalation of the conflict, a stalemate was inevitable. After ranging up and down the peninsula for almost eighteen months, the war was going to have to be settled at the bargaining table. With MacArthur relieved of command by presidential order, the way was cleared for the diplomatic wrangling to begin. The unanswered question was at what point would the combatants decide that they had suffered enough and discuss terms for a cease-fire. The agreement would only be reached after both sides incurred hideous casualties in pre-cease-fire positioning. AIR WAR OVER KOREA "The Air Force is on trial in Korea." --General Hoyt S. Vandenberg Air Force TCS North Korea began the war with 78 YAK-7Bs,30 PO-2s, and 70 IL-10s, all of which were prop-driven relics of the last war. Most of these aircraft were destroyed during the Fifth Air Force's early counter-air operations in 1950. Once that was accomplished, air supremacy was easily maintained by continually pounding North Korean airfields. 150 In the face of the UN fall counter-offensive in 1950, the Soviet Union undertook a massive effort to supply their communist brethren with first rate jet aircraft. The Chinese Communist Forces (CCF), which had entered the war in November, received the first of 3,000 aircraft promised by Moscow. THE MIG 15 Many of the new fighters reaching the Chinese were MiG-15s, the Soviet Union's hottest new interceptor. Its combat debut proved that the MiG- 15 was without equal over Korea. Overnight, the F-80s and F-82s were being challenged by an opponent which could out dive and out turn them. The MiG-15 was also good 100mph faster in level flight than anything it would happen to come across. USAF Mustangs now flew over the battlefield at their peril. The Fifth Air Force faced a window of vulnerability which would only be closed by deploying a fighter capable of taking on the MiG-15. Thankfully, as the Chinese armies plunged southward during the winter of 1950-51, the expected communist "aerial offensive" never materialized. It is possible that the CCF was reluctant to expose its aircraft to UN counter air measures. More likely, the CCF was afraid that staging its air power outside of Manchuria might be viewed as a serious escalation of the war. American ground troops were unaccustomed to not being able to call on air support. Communist leaders were unsure exactly how the U.S. would react to being subjected to a savage air campaign. Such an escalation, the Truman administration darkly hinted, could possibly lead to atomic retaliation. The Chinese and North Koreans were not the only participants in this war to fear escalation. The United States was also concerned that provocative actions by its air force might lead to a general widening of the conflict. One of the most controversial decisions of the war had to do with the bombing of the infamous Yalu River bridges. The Yalu River forms the northern border separating Chinese Manchuria from North Korea. When the Chinese army launched its campaign, the twelve major road and rail bridges over the Yalu provided the only means of supplying their massive army inside North Korea. Naturally these supply bottlenecks would have been excellent targets for UN interdiction missions. The MiG-15 made its combat debut during the Korean War. It came as quite a shock to the USAF whose prop-driven fighters were quickly routed off the battlefield. Ordered into production in 1948, these aircraft were flown from the assembly line straight into combat. In response, the United States began to offer a bounty for each MiG-15 pilot who defected with his aircraft. Known as Project "Moolah", the scheme was successful in bringing in a few stray MiGs. The F-86 Sabrejets were able to incorporate design features copied from the defector's aircraft. Although the MiGs had their own limitations, they were an even match for the Sabrejet. Quick and very maneuverable, the MiGs also packed a more powerful punch. The F-86 Sabrejets were under gunned but benefited from a stabilized gunsight that the MiGs lacked. Only the advanced level of pilot training and tactical co-ordination allowed the F-86 to compete successfully for control of "MiG Alley." Sabrejet pilots would be astounded at the array of sophisticated targeting and flight systems available to the Eagle drivers. The cockpit would be totally alien and unfamiliar place. The same would be true for the MiG-15 pilot stepping into a Fulcrum for the first time. As the century comes to a close, it remains a tight race for air supremacy. Again the clean, aerodynamic lines of the MiG-29 and F-15 give an external appearance of similarity which belies their internal differences. The long range capabilities of these aircraft tend to make maneuverability a moot consideration . Rather than compare flight envelopes, in the 1990s we tend to think in terms of systems, radars and weapons. The aircraft itself is only thought off as the vehicle providing mobility to these systems. As before, the deciding factor in air combat may come down to simple pilot training and individual skills. As tempting as these targets were, UN aircraft were forbidden to bomb that close to the Chinese border. Using the standard iron bombs of the day, the United States was unwilling to undertake the considerable risk of collateral damage within China's national boundary. The chance of inadvertently straying into Chinese airspace would be great on such missions. Since the Yalu river formed the border, USAF bombers would be forced to make their approach runs at a perpendicular angle to the bridges. The chances of scoring hits on the bridges using this type of attack profile were minimal. The better method of attack using unguided munitions would have been to approach along the bridge axis. Pilots would certainly have had to cross into Chinese airspace to carry out these attacks, either on the bombing run or while exiting. THE 4TH TFW ENTERS MIG ALLEY With the introduction of the MiG-15, the hotly contested area surrounding the Yalu River quickly became known to U.S. pilots as "MiG Alley." The USAF responded to the MiG-15 by sending the 4th Fighter- Interceptor Wing and 27th Fighter-Escort Wing to Korea. These units, made up of F84E Thunderjets and F-86 Sabrejets, were given their movement orders on 8 November. The 4th Fighter Wing, stationed in New Castle County Airport in Wilmington, Delaware, flew to San Diego where it was put aboard ship. By 15 December, F-86s from the 4th Fighter Wing were flying CAP over northwestern Korea, the heart of MiG alley. The MiG-15 could claim a marginal superiority over the F-86 at high altitudes. Being lighter, the MiG could climb somewhat faster and had a higher operational ceiling than the F-86. The MiG's swept-wing design gave it a top end speed of almost 660 miles per hour. On a good day with an experienced pilot behind the stick, the MiG could hold its own. The F86, on the other hand, was more suited to lower altitude combat. The plane picked up momentum in a dive like a falling safe but tended to bleed off energy quickly once returning to level flight. In combat the F-86's .50 caliber machine guns lacked the punch of the MiG's cannons but could still shred an enemy aircraft in seconds. The 336th Squadron, partially based at Kimpo, got its first recorded MiG-15 kill on 17 December only days after arriving in country. The other two squadrons, the 334th and 335th were stationed outside of Tokyo. 152 These squadrons had to make the long flight to Korea and back on each mission. By the end of the year (1950), the 4th Fighter Wing had racked up 234 counter-air sorties and claimed eight confirmed MiGs shot down. POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS Along the length of "MiG Alley" Chinese MiGs would climb above U.S. patrols while still inside Chinese airspace. Having reached a position above and behind, the MiGs would then dash across the border to strike the U.S. formations from a point of maximum advantage. Making only a single pass, they would "blow through" and then dash to safety over the border. Although MiG pilots tended to rely on slashing attacks from above, the plane was actually more suited to horizontal engagements. Chinese MiGs were also making life uncomfortable for the multiengined bombers performing missions near the border. The favorite tactic was again to use Chinese airspace to reach a superior altitude. Once in position the MiGs would dive on the bomber formations and convert that dive energy into speed for the quick getaway back over the border. Fuel consumption, which placed severe restrictions U.S. fighters, was not a concern for the MiG pilots. The Chinese established major airfields literally only minutes from the border. Antung (Dandong) air base located at the mouth of the Yalu was particularly active during this period. MiGs from this base took a heavy toll of B-29s on bombing raids near the border. USAF pilots were expressly prohibited from engaging in "hot pursuit" into Chinese airspace. In effect, the MiG-15s were given safe conduct passes back to their Manchurian airfields. Despite the handicaps, UN pilots made a good showing for themselves. Superior training and coordination more than made up for the deficiencies. By the end of the war, UN pilots had destroyed over 800 MiG-15s in air-to-air combat while losing just over a hundred of their own. By 1952, UN pilots were enjoying a kill ratio of well over 13-1. Even without being able to strike the Yalu bridges, the restrictive nature of North Korean terrain allowed the strategic bombing campaign to concentrate on just a few access routes. The mountainous regions and swift moving rivers confined supply columns to the easily identified road network. UN aircraft kept up continuous patrols over the network of roads and immediately pounced on any Chinese that happened along. As the UN retreat from North Korea was taking place, the Chinese were decimated as they attempted to pursue. Even though the communist ground offensive had slowed, the intensity of the air war had not. In fact, MiG pilots were becoming even more aggressive. The B-29 bomber streams flying night missions for safety now found themselves being engaged by night fighters. Communist radar stations were being established in North Korea to help direct the MiGs to their targets. As the ground war spilled into South Korea, communist aircraft began to experience the same problems that had plagued UN pilots. Having to travel further to and from their Manchurian bases to reach the front, the MiGs had less time to spend over the battlefield. Flying outside the proximity of their Manchurian safe havens, the MiGs suffered accordingly. UN pilots maintained their control of South Korean airspace during daylight hours. Night was more of an even contest due primarily to the universal lack of effective night fighting equipment. IN SEARCH OF A MISSION Communist intransigence over terms for a cease-fire left military and political leaders looking for ways to employ their air power. One faction believed that air power could only anger the communists and keep them away from the bargaining table. Another faction believed the opposite, that increased pressure would force an armistice. The question remained how best to utilize aircraft and against what type of targets? With the communist drive halted near the 38th Parallel, UN strategists in 1952 were forced to recognize that air power alone was unlikely to force the Chinese to come to terms. For one thing, North Korea received all its military equipment from outside sources. It did not have an indigenous industry capable of supporting the war effort. Hence, there was nothing to knock out that might cause a surrender. "OPERATION STRANGLE" The best air power was likely to achieve in 1952 was a continued campaign of interdicting communist supply routes. It was realized that this effort 1 53 would not entice the Chinese to negotiate but it would forestall a renewed offensive until a solution could be found. The USAF had devised a massive campaign against the North Korean rail net and logistical support system known as "Operation Strangle" The campaign was a repeat of the interdiction effort directed against roadways early in the war. For ten months, UN pilots laid siege to communist rail lines. Strangle failed due largely to the ability of peasant workers being able to repair the rail lines just as fast as they were destroyed. In March 1952, Operation Strangle was replaced by a new tactic. Instead of interdicting wide areas of railroad, UN bombers were to concentrate on specific two-mile long sections of track. The idea was to obliterate sections of the railway rather than just causing temporary damage. The change in tactics was given the code name "Operation Saturate." Unfortunately, communist workers proved too adept at repairing bomb damage. Heavy losses inflicted by triple-A forced a cancellation of interdiction efforts by the strategic bomber force. With the armistice talks stalled and the failure of Strangle and Saturate, attention turned to a resumption of strategic bombing. From May 1952 until the end of the war, massed bomber formations were sent over North Korea to pressure the communists into accepting cease-fire terms. The air campaign toward the end of the war resembled the final days of World War ll. Strategic bombing could not win a war alone, but it could be used effectively as a political weapon of persuasion. _ RETURN TO MIG ALLEY: SCENARIO _ Due to his advanced age, the death of Kim ll-Sung had hardly come as a surprise to anyone in North Korea. As happened with Japan's former emperor, Hirohito, the national leadership was paralyzed while in the midst of a death vigil. The portly, double-chinned dictator left North Korea without a clearly defined transfer of power. Kim had, after all, ruled the country ever since World War ll. His xenophobic brand of Stalinism had kept an iron grip on government aided by an army of secret police and paid informants. Though espousing the communist line, Kim ll-Sung had been a monarch in everything but name. While living, Kim had done his best to insure that the mantle of government would be passed along to his heir. F 15 IN THE HILLS OF KOREA His son, the younger Kim, fancies himself a modern-day Alexander the Great, eager to assume his father's position and titles. And just as Alexander's father Philip had bequeathed him the Macedonian phalanx, the elder Kim had left behind a phalanx of Soviettanks and aircraft. Thanks to his father's adroit diplomatic skill at playing China and the Soviet Union against one another, young Kim stood to inherit an awesome military machine. THE PRODIGAL SON Like all ambitious sons, the young Kim aspires to surpass even his father's former glory. Having had many years to silently contemplate this moment, he has moved swiftly to eliminate his opposition within the party apparatus. He will succeed where his father had failed and in so doing, he will be the one people remember, and not his father. Gone are all those men who fed their personal ambitions by orbiting around his father. Gone too, are all those in the cabinet who counseled moderation. Just as his father before him, Kim alone knows what is best 1 54 for the Korean people. Taking his cue from the success of German reunification, Kim has decided to bring together north and south, under his leadership, of course. By merging the populous south with the industrial north, Kim's plan is to forge an economic powerhouse more powerful than any other along the Pacific rim. Although the Japanese were far ahead for now, he mused, their society was fast becoming too decadent and westernized. In Kim's mind, as the Japanese people begin to demand the fruits of their economic miracle and decades of hard work, they will become soft. Just as the capitalist West had allowed the Japanese to overtake them, Korea would in turn displace the Japanese. Like the Americans who had allowed their industrial base to erode into a service economy, the Japanese would do the same. Human nature and the pursuit of luxury would do his work for him. Naturally he could not expect to walk into South Korea unopposed. South Korea governments had provided the people with a modicum of personal liberties and a standard of living that most found acceptable. His biggest allies inside South Korea were leftist agitators on university campuses. Using student demonstrations to ferment unrest was an inexpensive means of shaking up the government. Continued student demonstrations turned into serious civil disturbances requiring the government to react, sometimes violently. The students repeatedly protested against U.S. "imperialism" and called for reunification. Having been financed and supported by North Korean "bagmen," the demonstrations were certainly giving Kim his money's worth. NORTH KOREA'S NUCLEAR THREAT Over the past decade, the North Korean nuclear program had progressed smartly. It had benefited by not being in the spotlight of world attention as had certain Middle Eastern nations. Because of oil, the United States had become intimately familiar with the Arab world. Lacking oil, most Americans couldn't find North Korea on a map. Except for a couple of back-page newspaper articles, the North Korean nuclear complex at Yongbyon had been constructed and brought on-line with little fanfare. Using a tributary of the Chongchon for reactor coolant, Yonqbyon had for many months been processing weapons-grade plutonium from nuclear waste. Because of the North Korean penchant for burying their facilities, most of Yongbyon was underground, away from prying eyes. The overall military and political strategy of North Korea could make little use of the nuclear weapons being produced. It was hard to envisage a situation where nuclear weapons would be used against South Korea, the very territory they hoped to occupy intact. Possession of nuclear weapons for their deterrent effect was also discounted. Even Kim ll Sung was not so deluded as to believe that the Soviet Union, United States or even China would be deterred by North Korea's tiny nuclear arsenal. Lacking a capability to deliver nuclear weapons out of theater, North Korean was inviting retaliatory destruction just by possessing them. Why then, a nuclear weapons program? For North Korea, the whole point of their nuclear program was to produce weapons to be sold abroad. Of course North Korea might keep one or two low yield tactical warheads on hand, but for the most part nuclear weapons were built to sell. The money or bartered goods these weapons could bring would then be used to buy more useful conventional arms. With the Soviet military now holding a garage sale, North Korea would be able to re-equip itself on the cheap. THE IRAQI CONNECTION One of the best potential customers was Iraq. Following the Persian Gulf War, Iraq's own nuclear weapons program lay in ruins. Its most crucial facilities been leveled during the war. After the war, UN inspection teams uncovered additional facilities untouched by the bombing. With the world now alert, rejuvenating Iraq's nuclear program would be impossible. A startup program would be too visible and just too costly. The fastest and safest way to acquire nuclear weapons from now on was to buy or steal them. Although details are quite sketchy, it appears that a number of Iraq's special service operatives were caught inside the former Soviet Union trying to capture a special weapons storage complex. Apparently, a fire fight erupted between the Iraqi commandos and a Soviet security detachment. The security force was only able to gain the upper hand following the explosion of an Iraqi transport loaded with ammunition. The majority of the commando team went up along with the plane. The remaining Iraqis were captured and killed outright or taken in for interrogation. The raid had left a lot of Russian soldiers, most of them teenagers, lying dead on the ground. Moscow was not happy. Many of the captured Iraqi commandos were in for a rough time. Vae Victus. Having failed in their attempt to steal a warhead, the Iraqis made secret overtures to the North Koreans. Since both governments were diplomatically isolated on the world stage, they found it easy to accept that fate had joined their two countries in this venture. A sales agreement was signed whereby North Korea agreed to deliver two 40 kiloton warheads along with mating schematics for Iraq's Scud missiles. The purchase price was a minimum of 140 million barrels of Iraqi crude to be delivered over the next five years. In addition, North Korea would receive technical assistance in constructing a super gun like the one destroyed by the U.N. inspection team. Finally, North Korea would receive $1.2 billion dollars equivalent in U.S. currency upon receipt of the first warhead. A FATEFUL VOYAGE The first of the two warheads was loaded aboard a North Korean tanker, the C'huche, at Namp'o naval base less than a month after the agreement was signed. $1.2 billion would buy a lot of Soviet hardware and the young Kim was in a hurry. The C'huche, meaning "self- reliance," set sail for the Persian Gulf at a leisurely 15 knots trying to appear as inconspicuous as possible. On the return trip it would be loaded with Iraqi crude oil to further the deception. Unbeknownst to the North Koreans, the tanker was being tracked by a U.S. Lacrosse surveillance satellite from the moment it left port. In a rare successful use of HUMINT resources, the National Security Agency (NSA) based at Fort Meade, Maryland had gotten wind of the transaction. Disgruntled members of Kim's ousted cabinet eager to see the usurper disappear had passed the information to U.S. officials. Four days out of Namp'o, the C'huche was intercepted by surface elements of the U.S 7th Fleet. CH-53s (Sea Stallion) helicopters from the USS Peleliu, a Tarawa class LHA, dropped a Navy SEAL team directly on the tanker's spacious deck. Making the actual stop were two Spruance class destroyers, the John Young (DD 973) and Ingersoll (DD 990). Covering the operation from a distance was the Thomas S. Gates (CG 51), a Ticonderoga class guided-missile cruiser. Its powerful Aegis radar kept a constant vigil during the entire boarding procedure. A nuclear device was located in the tanker's hold and removed by Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) trained SEALs. In a tense transfer operation, the warhead was hoisted aboard one of the Sea Kings and flown directly to the Peleliu. U.S. Marines then boarded the C'huche and conducted a thorough top to bottom inspection. At the conclusion of the operation, ship and crew were allowed to continue. Howls of protest and cries of international piracy immediately came from North Korean diplomats worldwide. To anyone who would listen, the North Koreans promised that this act of blatant theft would not go unpunished. While steadfastly denying that a nuclear weapon had been recovered, Kim charged the U.S. with deliberately interfering with North Korea's right to free trade on the high seas. The Korean threats were viewed seriously by the administration but government officials believed they were prepared to deal with any eventuality. The State Department was quick to post travel advisories in its embassies and government employees were asked to delay their travel plans. The travel advisories were then very quickly made available to the general public. No one wished to repeat the controversy surrounding prior notification that occurred following the post-Lockerbie revelations. Several days after the tanker was stopped, a South Korean freighter suddenly and mysteriously exploded in the Sea of Japan. Although rumors of sabotage were tossed around, one unconfirmed report mentioned witnesses seeing torpedo tracks. The report of a submarine was met with a good deal of skepticism until a second freighter blew up one day later. Both the U.S. and South Korean governments lodged formal complaints at the United Nations in New York. North Korea, through its intermediaries, vehemently denied complicity in the sinking of the two freighters. It blamed the loss of these two ships on the South Korean government. According to the North Koreans, South Korea was engaged in planting contact mines off its coast. Undoubtedly, the two ships were lost as a result of premature detonations of the mines they were carrying. Satellite reconnaissance of North Korean ports, however, showed that North Korean submarines were out in force. As a precautionary measure U.S. P-3 Orion sub-hunters began doubling their daily sweeps from their bases in Japan. With two ships lost in as many days, Lloyd's brokerage in London was threatening to suspend its underwriting of civilian merchant shipping entering the Sea of Japan. After two days of stepped up efforts, a magnetic anomaly detection (or MAD) contact was finally made by an Orion crew some 220 nautical miles northeast of Wonsan. The P-3 bracketed the underwater contact with a neatly spaced double-row of sonobuoys set to active ping. Almost immediately the contact began evasive maneuvering but it was too late. Caught moving parallel to the buoys, the contact's revved-up prop returns identified it as a Whiskey class diesel-electric boat. THE DEATH OF RENO ZERO ONE As the P-3 crew (designated RENO 01) continued to work the sub contact, an AWACS flying out of Misawa AB, Japan detected a pair of "bogeys" closing in on the sub-hunter from the north . The female controller's steady voice was easily recognizable above all the extraneous chatter. "RENO 01, This is FREEBIRD. Hot Dog, Hot Dog, Hot Dog....Bogies bearing 327, Angels 5 at 100 miles." "FREEBIRD, this RENO 01. Authenticate Bravo Thr..." "Authenticate nothing, RENO 01. Clear outta' there. You've got a pair of MiGs in the neighborhood and headed your way. Come right to a heading of 125, that'll put 'em in your seven 'o clock " "Roger, FREEBIRD. Can you call in some friendlies for me?" "RENO 01, This is FREEBIRD. Already done. There's a couple of Eagle- Charlies on the way at the speed o' heat. Should be there in five. " "FREEBIRD, This is RENO 01. We just got a radar spike. I think they're really gonna' shoot Tell those guys to hurry up." P3 ORION (RENO-01) The intercept order had already gone out to the Ready Fives on the ground at Kunsan. It was clear that they would never reach RENO 01 in time. Even though the Orion pilot had gone to full military power and was receiving guidance from the AWACS, the bogies' closure rate was just too high. The P-3 would not get away. At a range of 40 nautical miles, two MiG-29A Fulcrums locked-up the slow moving sub-hunter on their "Slot Back" pulse-Doppler targeting radar. Closing to eight nautical miles the lead aircraft let loose a pair of AA10 "Alamo-A" radar guided missiles. The J-band seekers in the missiles' nose cone would have no trouble in distinguishing the target. The radar cross section of a P-3 would look like a barn door to the missile's microchip brain. As the first AA-10 slammed into the plane's mid-section the second buried itself in the starboard wing before exploding. RENO 01 immediately went into a 45 degree right bank and nosed over. It hit the water at over 300 knots, cart wheeled, and broke apart. The AWACS controller solemnly watched her screen showing the two MiGs retreat back into North Korean airspace and land at Toksan airfield outside of Hamhung. Two F-15Cs reached the sinking wreckage within minutes only to report back that no survivors were sighted. Diplomatic communications between the White House and government ministry building in Pyongyang all but ceased. Instead, a heated series of back channel exchanges took place, full of charge and countercharge. The players weren't out to score debating points though; American military personnel were dead and North Korea was going to pay. This wasn't some tree clearing incident along the DMZ. This had been a deliberate attack in international airspace. HAIL TO THE CHIEFS Back on the flight line at Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base in North Carolina, F-15Es belonging to the 335th Fighter Squadron or "Chiefs" were in motion . A major redeployment to Korea was about to get underway and the eagle-keepers had their hands full. Arcing skyward in the predawn hours off runway 08, F-15Es left Seymour-Johnson in flights of six at one hour intervals. The first leg of the long flight to Korea would take them over the Great Lakes and then north into Canada. The F-15s would need to rendezvous 1 57 with at least four tankers before reaching their initial stopover in Alaska. As the lead group touched down on Elmendorf AFB's runway 25, over on the right the morning sun was reflecting off Mt. Mckinley's snow-capped peak. The stay at Elmendorf was a brief one for the 335th crews. The pilots and "Wizzos" had just enough time to catch a quick nap and maybe grab a Moose-nugget key chain from the local Base Exchange as a souvenir. Maintenance crews at Elmendorf worked feverishly checking and rechecking flight systems for the "feet-wet" leg of the trip to Korea. After an abbreviated turn around, the men of the 335th were once again on their way. Leveling off at flight level 260 (26,000 ft), the F-15 crews had not even settled in before having to hit the first tanker. Each member of the flight would top-off with about 800 Ibs. of fuel just to ensure the fuel tanks were operating properly. Aircraft with defective fuel tanks would have to be identified and abort the mission prior to heading out over the Pacific. ACROSS THE BIG POND Travelling at 460 knots, the trans-Pacific leg into Kadena AB on Okinawa took about eight hours. Since taking off at Elmendorff the F- 15s had logged 3,900 miles before going wheels down at Kadena. Both men and machines were in need of rest. Maintenance crews would be flying into Kadena on C-141 Starlifters in the next several hours. In the meantime, the drivers and back-seaters would be catching up on some well-deserved sleep. Before long they would be making the short hop to Osan AB, South Korea. In the interim, relations between the U.S. and North Korea had been steadily deteriorating. The National Security Council (NSC) and Joint Chiefs had reached a general consensus concerning North Korean sales of nuclear weapons to Iraq. If necessary, the U.S. would resort to ground strikes on North Korean nuclear facilities to prevent the transfer of nuclear hardware. Word out of the ClA's Vint Hill Farms complex was that Kim was going to attempt another transfer in the near future. Having failed by sea, this second transfer according to sources would probably take place by air, making interception somewhat more difficult. Impromptu think tanks tried to address the obvious questions. What if the warhead was secretly placed aboard a civilian airliner along with passengers? How do you stop and search a passenger jet? And finally, would the U.S. shoot down a plane loaded with civilians to prevent Iraa from obtaining a nuclear weapon? A RETURN TO MIG ALLEY The President was left with no alternative but to authorize a series of air strikes on North Korean nuclear installations, ports and selected air- fields. The Yongbyon processing plant in particular would have to be taken out. The 335th Squadron's Strike Eagles at Osan were put on alert. At any minute the call would come through to begin hitting predetermined targets. After all these years, the Chiefs will be returning to "MiG Alley" once again. KOREAN COMMENTARY The first Korean War took place in an era far removed from the type of aerial combat you will experience in F-15 Strike Eagle lll. There were no long-range engagements. Everything was done up close and personal. Air-to-air missiles and precision guided ordnance had yet to make their debut. In fact, the majority of bombing raids were conducted by aircraft with piston-driven engines, remnants of the last major war. Even the venerable P-51 Mustang of WW ll was a common sight over North Korea early in the war. The war did provide the venue for a classic confrontation, reminding one of the World War ll duel between German Me-109s and British Spitfires. The F-86 and MiG-15, two evenly matched fighters, became locked in a lethal air battle with the prize being air supremacy over Korea. 1 58 While neither aircraft could claim a significant advantage over the other, each had its own unique set of characteristics which could potentially give it an edge in a dogfight. Aerial combat in the 1950s was almost exclusively a "stick and rudder" affair with guns thrown in. It was actually more akin to the last aerial battles in WW ll than the first battles of the jet age. With both sides possessing similar aircraft, aerial combat was often decided by the individual skills of the pilots. In F-15 Strike Eagle IlI's Korean War scenario, you are required to revisit many of the same targets struck during the 1950s. This time, however, you face significant threats that the earlier pilots did not. Since the Fifties, North Korea has purchased a substantial amount of SAMs and has invested heavily in triple-A guns. Not only are the air defenses better equipped but the air force is much improved. Its pilots are far better trained the "recruit pilots" which flew the MiG- 15s. Staging from South Korean bases, your F-15E is required to penetrate the heart of the enemy's air defenses. Lavishly equipped with SAMs, North Korea can best be described as treacherous. Rugged North Korean terrain, with its numerous peaks and valleys, makes flying more difficult yet provides a sanctuary for you to hide in. An experienced pilot can shake a missile "lock" in a hurry by using terrain properly. _ NORTH KOREAN ORDER OF BATTLE _ GROUND FORCES: 2 Armored divisions, 5 Mechanized Infantry divisions, 31 Infantry divisions, 6 Armored brigades, 4 Artillery brigades, 20 Artillery regiments, 5 Airborne battalions Major Equipment: (3,500) MBTs T54155162s, PT-76s, Type 62s, (2,000) APCs BTR40/50/60/152s, BMP-ls, (3,500) artillery pieces incl. 122mm and 152mm SPA AIR FORCE: 3 Light Bomber squadrons, 10 F/GA squadrons, 12 Interceptor squadrons, 3 Transport squadrons, 7 Training squadrons Major Equipment: (50) IL- 28, (30) SU-7, (10) SU-25, (50) MiG-19, (58) MiG-23, (48) MiG-29, (40) A-5 Fantan, (200) An-2, (10) An-24 NAVAL FORCES: (2) Najin class Frigates, (1) Soho class Frigates, (16) Romeo class Submarines, (4) Whiskey class Submarines, (4) Soju class FACs (imrroved Osa). (12) Osa Is AIR DEFENSES: 2 SAM divisions, 5 SSM regiments Maior Equipment: 50) SA-2, (30) SA-3, (54) SA-5 III. CENTRAL AMERICA SCENARIO "A MAN, A PIAN, A CANAL PANAMA" Prior to the 20th century, Panama had been just a distant province of Colombia, separated from the rest of the country by mountains and jungle. But the proposed construction of a trans-oceanic canal through the region had made it a very desirable piece of property. Linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, the Panama Canal would make the lengthy voyage around South America's Cape Horn unnecessary. The benefit of such a short cut was driven home during the SpanishAmerican war when the battleship USS Oregon had to sail around South America in order to join the U.S. fleet off Cuba. The Oregon had been instrumental in providing America's margin of victory in the Battle of Santiago. The military usefulness of such a link thus demonstrated, commercial transportation costs would also be cut dramatically by shortening the length of time goods spent at sea. A French engineering firm had been awarded the contract to complete the canal in the 1880s. But after six years and the death of 20,000 workers due to disease, the company abandoned the effort. Asking for over $100 million to cover its expenses, French investors put the unfinished canal up for sale. The United States quickly expressed an interest but at the same time entered into negotiations concerning an alternate route through Nicaragua. Faced with this new competition, the French firm decided to cut its losses and lowered its offer to only $40 million. The United States, which had not been discouraged by the French failure, accepted this lowered asking price. However, if Americans were going to build the canal, we were equally determined to own it. Even at $40 million, the Panama route was expensive when one considers the $15 million paid for the whole of the Louisiana territory, or $7,200,000 paid for Alaska. The United States opened a round of negotiations with Colombian authorities seeking to create a six mile wide Canal Zone. In 1903, the Hay-Herran treaty formally gave the U.S. rights 1 61 to the Canal Zone for $10 million down and $250,000 a year in rent. After the pact was concluded, Colombian officials decided to up the price to $25 million. Referring to those "foolish and homicidal corruptionists in Bogota~" rough-riding Theodore Roosevelt flew in to a rage. Now acting as President as a result of McKinley's assassination i n 1901, Roosevelt was determined to have the canal. Having won fame in the Caribbean for his charge up San Juan Hill, he was used to confrontational tactics with Latin Americans. In a display of chicanery unparalleled since the Mexican-American war, Roosevelt engineered an uprising in the port of Colon against Colombian officials. Headquarters for this "people's revolt" was Room 1162 of the New York Waldorf-Astoria hotel, an unlikely spot for Colombian revolutionaries to meet. It was here that the conspirators raised money to secure Panama's independence from Colombia. The revolution FLYING DANGER-CLOSE OVER PANAMA CITY was led by a number of former Colombian soldiers in the pay of the certain U.S. citizens. In case Bogota protested, the navy cruiser USS Nashville just happened to be on hand. Not only did Colombia protest but it tried to send military forces into Panama to reclaim it. Unfortunately, an impenetrable jungle stood in the way and U.S. warships were in position to interfere with any move up the coast. A civil war in Colombia had ended just prior to the Panamanian revolt. Known as the War of a Thousand Days, it had cost the military over lO,000 lives. Consequently, Colombia was in no shape to confront the U.S. on this issue and in the end was forced to recognize the independence of its former province. "Tell them that I am going to make the dirt fly." --Theodore Roosevelt in 1903 The revolt had been successful. After placing hand-picked Panamanian officials in power Roosevelt signed a treaty giving the U.S. rights to the canal in perpetuity. For $10 million down and $250,000 a year (terms of the original deal with Colombia), the U.S. had gotten its bargain after all. The canal was built ahead of schedule and by coincidence was opened for business only days after the start of World War I in 1914. The unsavory manner in which Roosevelt obtained the Canal Zone never sat well with American ideals of fair play. When asked by Roosevelt himself to defend the President's actions, Attorney General Philander C. Knox responding, "Oh, Mr. President, do not let so great an achievement suffer from any taint of legality." Though ownership of the Canal had been crucial to the conduct of our two-ocean war strategy in World War II, it still had a certain stigma attached to it. Continued possession lent credence to Latino charges of Yanqui imperialism and tainted relations with our hemispheric neighbors. "We stole it fair and square, so why can't we keep it?" --U.S. Senator during the 1977 debates Serious consideration over the return of the canal to Panama began during the Carter administration in the late 1970s. President Jimmy Carter 1 62 and fellow Democrats pushed hard for Senate ratification of the Panama Canal Treaty which would relinquish control of the canal in 1999. The debate was divisive. Republicans charged the Democrats with being soft on foreign policy but in the end the treaty managed to squeezed through passage. The 1977 Panama Canal Treaty was now law, committing the United States to return the Canal Zone to Panama by 31 December 1999. OPERATION "JUST CAUSE" In 1989, after invoking the right of "self defense" clause contained in the treaty, the United States launched "Operation Just Cause." Just Cause came in response to repeated harassment of U.S. citizens, military and civilian, within the Zone. But the underlying goal of the operation was the capture of Panama's "Maximum Leader" General Manuel Antonio Noriega. Noriega had been a onetime CIA paid informant but lately the U.S. had linked him to illicit drug trafficking. Over a five-day period General Noriega had managed to elude over 20,000 U.S. servicemen by making his way to the Vatican embassy in Panama City. Fed a diet of steady high volume rock 'n roll music by members of the 82nd Airborne Division, Noriega finally surrendered to U.S. authorities. He was immediately whisked away to eventually stand trial for various crimes including dealing in narcotics. In the decade following the ouster of strongman and CIA confidant, Manuel Noriega, much has happened to the former Republic of Panama. A succession of civilian governments, all enjoying tacit U.S. approval, have failed due to rampant inflation and stagnant national economy. The support promised by the United States in the wake of General Noriega's departure did not materialize. With severe budgetary problems of its own, the United States was forced to curtail many of its foreign aid programs. Panama, never high on anyone's list to begin with, was dropped entirely. As a result, Panama became a nation adrift. Burdened by a mounting national debt and nonexistent middle class, the tiny country descended into chaos. The few fortunate souls with means took their money and their families out of the country. Those remaining behind were mainly native mestizos. With no hope for the future a generation of poor grew up just outside governmental installations, subsisting on occasional handouts or scrounging through military refuse. The only source of steady income still open was plantation work on land owned by a few large corporations. Obligated by treaty to turn over control of the Canal Zone, the United States was alarmed by what it saw happening in Panama. In secret Congressional deliberations, National Security Counsel (NSC) staffers testified in favor of postponing the return of the canal area indefinitely. Citing unrest and the potential for terrorist activity, the NSC called for, ". . . the removal of all military forces from the region or reinforcing those forces already in theater to degree commensurate with the level of violence." Civilian officials in the State Department had also taken a pessimistic tone, summing up their findings by concluding, ". . .an intolerable situation exists in which elected representatives in Panama are unlikely to exercise positive control over the Canal proper and its environs in the future." THE YANQUIS GO HOME Despite these dire predictions, the President ignored the warnings of this cabinet officials and dutifully carried out the letter of the treaty. The 193rd Infantry Brigade was removed from the Canal Zone accompanied by much public fanfare. Panama rejoiced over the proceedings as the Stars and Stripes was hauled down from Albrook Air Base for the last time. All U.S. Army personnel were redeployed back to the states while the Air Force sent its people to other overseas locations. Months ahead of the required date the Canal Zone was for the first time in its history sovereign territory of the Panamanian republic. As the glow of celebration died down, the responsibility stemming from ownership began to sink in. The Canal had never been profitable since it began operating in 1914. It had survived year after year only as a result of huge U.S. subsidies. Whether Panama could now afford its prize possession remained an open question. THE "LEBANON-IZATION" OF PANAMA The social divide separating rich from poor in Panama resulted in the formation of very distinct political castes. The peasant class, which had originally banded together for economic survival, wound up fragmenting into a system of regional alliances. As the these ties grew, a more structured and formalized system of family loyalties emerged. As this fragmentation progressed, Panamanian society began to rely far less heavily on its central government. 1 63 Largely seen as a tool of northern imperialism, the government lacked both credibility and relevance. It was as if no one was paying attention any longer. As the various clans gained strength, they evolved into something closely resembling large fraternities. Though there were strong similarities between the clans and organized crime in the U.S. it would be wrong to make too much of this analogy. The Panamanian peasants gathered more to present a solid political front against exploitation than to engage sinister activities. In a less anarchic state these groups might even been considered political parties. But, because the central government had to ceased to function effectively, there was no point in running for elective office. No one group could hope to win enough converts from the others to achieve anything close a national consensus. The break down in government led to a situation where the clans began exercising unchecked power. Recognizing no law higher than their own each group had taken part in the de facto dismantling of the country. A new period in Panamanian history was dawning, the country was becoming "Lebanon-ized." "BARRIO BEIRUT"; PANAMANIAN CML WAR A crisis was brewing that even Americans working in the Zone could detect. The nickname "Barrio Beirut" came into popular use when referring to Panama City. In deference to the U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia, military retirees began tooling around the city with bumper-stickers reading "PANA-NAM." Luckily for them, perhaps, the locals weren't hip to the humor. It is hard to pinpoint the exact moment when civil war broke out in Panama. There were never any declarations just a noticeable increase in the level of violence. As wars go, this one was fought more as a series of grudges. One faction would pick a fight with another over some perceived insult, either real or imagined. For the next few weeks both sides would bang away at each other and then things would go pretty much back to "normal." Torn by civil strife, it wasn't long before outside influences began making inroads. The country was overrun by small groups of Cuban socialists, Peruvian-Marxists, right-wing totalitarians, hemispherists, and radicals of every conceivable political bent. But on the heels of this ideological stew came a more insidious intrusion. Intent on opening new drug routes to the United States, narco-trafficantes flocked to the lawless "Wild West" atmosphere of Panama's steaming jungles. "LITTLE COLOMBIA" South American drug cartels looked upon Panama as an ideal spot from which to operate. In the day when Noriega was in charge, Colombian drug lords had paid a high sum in brides to use its facilities. Dirt strip runways abounded in areas which were otherwise inaccessible. Now, with routes already established, these same smugglers could open shop in jungle clearings for nothing. In fact, using their huge profits they could recruit battalions of impoverished natives as guards. Motivated by a desire to provide a decent life for their families these men willingly participated in the drug trade. What choice did they have other than watching their children slowly starve? Within several years, drug activity through Panama became pandemic. Marijuana grown in clandestine fields competed with the jungle laboratories producing cocaine slag from Peruvian leaves. The Chucunaque river valley in eastern Panama became so infested with cocaine processing camps it became known as "Little Colombia." Nestled snugly between two mountain ranges, del Darien and de Canazas, to Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) men, Little Colombia was Panama's A-Shau Valley. Despite the U.S. declaration of war on drugs, very little had actually been accomplished. The reluctance to train and use military personnel in this war had crippled the effort. More importantly the DEA's high- handed tactics had alienated the very foreign governments it depended on for help. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1992 to allow the kidnapping and extradition of wanted persons from foreign countries had not played well in South American capitals. The intrusive nature of America's "War on Drugs" had driven relations to a new low, worse even, than during the Falkland-Malvinas conflict. The Colombian government in particular had been extremely upset by this policy and warned the U.S. against conducting such operations on its territory. As might be expected, DEA agents in Bogota and Medellin began to get rather frosty receptions from government officials. In Peru and Venezuela, cooperation in the drug war had never progressed much 164 beyond lip service, even before the Supreme Court's announcement. Relations between countries were further poisoned by the "accidental" attack on a P-3 Orion aircraft by a Peruvian Air Force jet, also in 1992. U .S. agents were being asked leave South America and escorted to the border by host-nation police. As worrisome as the situation in Panama was to the United States, Colombia was even more concerned. For a long time officials in Bogota had been turning a blind eye towards the drug related activities of its citizens within Panama. But while Bogota was well aware of Little Colombia, it could not overlook the fact that Panama also provided a safe haven for the terrorist organization, M-19. M l9 (APRIL l9TH MOVEMENT) M-19 made its first appearance during the early 1970s. Since then, it has waged a bloody terrorist campaign aimed at overthrowing the Colombian government. The group became famous for its theft of the priceless sword of Bolivar, the George Washington of South America. During the 1976 elections, M-19 gained a reputation for ruthlessness by kidnapping and murdering a local labor union leader. Then in 1980, the group staged a takeover of the Dominican Republic's Colombian embassy. With increased notoriety came support from Cuba. Throughout the eighties, Castro allegedly provided arms and terrorist training to the subversives causing Bogota to severe diplomatic relations. Using the arms and equipment obtained from Cuba, M-19 conducted its most famous operation to date. In 1985, 24 of its members captured the Palace of Justice in Bogota. During the two day siege which followed, the terrorists murdered the supreme court justices they had found inside. The military was called in and finally retook the building but only after more than 100 people were killed. The exploit electrified the nation. The Colombian government responded by declaring an "all-out offensive" on terrorism which continued into the mid-199Os. It reluctantly made concessions to various drug barons in return for money and assistance. Their effort paid off. Within months, Colombia was successful in disrupting M-19 within its own borders. Cells were broken up, arms caches discovered and soon the group was out of the terrorist business. Recognizing the extent of their defeat, surviving members of the group surrendered to authorities. With their weapons turned in, M-19 could no longer use terror as a means of persuasion. Over the next several years the group worked on repairing its image and sought to join the legitimate political process. Unfortunately, their brand of totalitarian socialism was no more palatable even when presented peacefully. The people of Colombia were not about to adopt anything remotely resembling communism, not after watching the Soviet Union implode during the 1990s. Before long, ideological firebrands within the M-19 organization were once again advocating a return to violence. Clearly, the country would not become socialist through normal methods. Turning again to Cuba for support, M-19 discarded any pretense of legitimacy. Legal means were just too slow when the country could be won by force of arms. Gathering its membership among young Cuban idealists and disaffected Colombian migrants, the group was back in the terrorist business. Not ready to challenge the government on its own soil, the guerrillas found the unrest in Panama to be perfect cover. Having been driven out of Colombia once, they established a network of jungle base camps just over the border. From these camps they were able to resume their terrorist campaigns within a very short time. In fact much of Colombia northwest of the Rio Atrato was soon under their influence. COLOMBIA'S MASTER STROKE Using the destruction of M-19's border sanctuaries as a pretense, Colombia has mounted a major land-sea-air campaign into eastern Panama. Prepared texts were sent out after the operation was underway to all O A.S. member states, including the United States. By comparing this operation to Israel's 1982 "Peace for Galilee" campaign, Colombia was trying to minimize unfavorable public opinion. According to the statement, Bogota viewed the incursion as a temporary measure only. Its forces would be withdrawn immediately upon completion of the operation. By any standards the operation was deftly handled. Naval units from the port of Buenaventura on Colombia's pacific coast disembarked a battalion of naval infantry at the mouth of the Rio Tuira. Upon landing the marine unit headed inland to the InterAmerican highway where they would be in position to intercept any M-19 guerillas retreating northward. On the ground, units of Colombia's 3rd Division had left their billets in Calli the day before. Pushing north up the highway, the 3rd Division's two mechanized brigades became the hammer against the marine battalion's anvil. True, the units were only equipped with M4A3 Sherman tanks, but if all went well the guerillas would be destroyed by two squadrons of A-37s waiting overhead. As the operation unfolded Colombian Rangers and Special Forces were airlifted deep into Panama. Riding in UH-ls and their new UH-60 Blackhawks, these troops were to secure key bridges and other strategic points along the InterAmerican highway. For example, an entire company of Rangers was inserted next to the bridge connecting both sides of Lake Bayano. The mission of these airmobile troops was actually two-fold, preventing guerillas from escaping to the Canal Zone and preventing outside forces (possibly U S ) from interfering. Flying Combat Air Patrol (CAP) over the entire operation were twenty- plus Mirage Ills and 5s. Pilots were told not to expect interference from Panamanian F-5 interceptors in the Canal zone but were warned to HIGH-G TURN OVER THE CANAL stay alert nonetheless. The Colombian jets circled along the border in long, lazy, oval Patterns being careful not provoke any reaction from Fort Howard. For the United States, Colombia's abrupt decision to invade eastern Panama had placed it in a delicate situation. One the one hand, the security of Panama was still largely a U S responsibility. But, upon reflection, the U.S was guilty of resorting to the same thing in 1989, using force to remove terrorism in the form of Noreiga. How could the United States protest a Colombian operation aimed at ridding itself of a communist terror organization? It couldn't. Like it or not, the U.S. was trapped in the logic of its own policies. The momentary indecision cost the U.S. the opportunity to keep the Colombians out of the Canal Zone. As efficient as the Colombians were, the operation failed to encircle the M-19 units. The guerillas had been tipped off by their undercover agents still in government. By picking up and moving their jungle camps deeper and farther west into Panama, they were able to elude the Colombian assault. Though the Colombian armored units rolling up the highway didn't yet know it, but they were throwing their best punch into thin air. Still, Colombian troops would soon be in control of most of eastern Panama. The fact that nothing had been heard from the Americans was encouraging. COLOMBIA STRIKES THE CANAL Very few guerrillas were captured during the initial phase of the Colombian operation. Aerial observation detected that many members of M-19 were heading for Panama City. Colombian mechanized units headed out of their bivouac cantonment near Lake Bayano. Moving at a high rate of speed for the canal, more than one hapless civilian lay crushed beneath their treads. Publicly it would be announced that these units were still engaged in rooting out the fleeing members of M-19. Privately, Colombian military officers had already decided to wrest control of the Canal Zone from Panama. After the American invasion in 1989, the Panamanian Defense Force (PDF) was disbanded. Also disarmed were Noriega's "Dignity Battalions," Panama's local militia comprised of little more than street toughs and thugs. In place of the Dignity Battalions a new military infrastructure had been created. In reality these changes were only cosmetic. The Panamanian military after 1990 was largely an army consisting of administrative headquarters. 166 Having inherited excellent airbases from the Americans after their departure, the Panamanian Air Force had no planes to fly. The Navy consisted of a few LSTs and patrol craft. But with nowhere to go and hardly any troops to transport, it spent all of its time at anchor. So while the 11,000 man Panamanian police force constituted the major opposition to Colombia, it could hardly be expected to hold the advancing armor for long. With the country in the midst of civil war, it had its hands full trying to maintain order in the first place. Since certain factions were actively assisting the Colombian military, prospects for halting their offensive were nil. On the northern end of the Canal Zone, a protracted firefight was in full swing. Seeking to carve up the port of Colon, Colombian drug barons sent members of their private army into the streets to drive out loyal Panamanian police units. Outnumbered and outgunned, the police evacuated the city after several days, leaving it to the hired mercenaries. What concerned Colombian military leaders the most was the possible intervention of U.S. air power. Although the decision to take on the United States was bitterly opposed by many junior officers, the ruling clique was solidly behind the plan. Having watched the performance of U.S. forces during the Gulf war spectacle, the generals still believed they could win. BANKING ON THE 'VIETNAM SYNDROME" For one thing, Colombia was not a desert nation. The area was covered with dense jungle growth and towering mountains. A war in this region would be largely an infantry affair, nullifying American advantages in armored forces. It would not be the type of fast moving, hard-hitting war fought in the Middle East or Europe. It was assumed that the United States would probably react strongly once satellite reconnaissance spotted tanks moving on the Canal Zone. But by the time U S forces could respond, Colombian forces would be firmly in possession of Panama and daring the U.S. to expend its "smart weaponry" in the dense jungle cover. Fighting in Central and South America would be more akin to fighting in Vietnam. Colombian soldiers were considered some of the best trained light infantry in South America, if not the world. Having fought guerrilla groups like, M-19, FARC and ELN for decades, the Colombian military could rightly lay claim to being battle-hardened. Its forces were superbly equipped and accustomed to jungle warfare just in case the U.S. was foolish enough to take them on in their own backyard. Most importantly however, Colombia had friends in the region it could turn to for help. Whereas, Iraq had been militarily and diplomatically isolated by the world community, Colombia was not. SEARCHING FOR ALLIES In 1981, Colombia's elected president Julio Cesar Turbay Ayala had flatly stated, " . . . i n view of the uncertain future and danger that is threatening the Caribbean ," Colombia had plans, "to improve all its deterrent military equipment ." In the 1980s and 1990s, Venezuela had been the danger he was speaking of. As a result, Turbay's rearmament program was specifically aimed at improving Colombia's conventional force deterrence. More recently however, the two countries have found cooperation more profitable than confrontation. Their economic policies have marched in lockstep for well over half a decade. It had always been assumed that should a ground war break out with Venezuela, Colombia's coal rich Guajira peninsula would be the reason. Disputed ownership of the land had come close to touching off war many times late in the 20th Century. But in the spirit of the new ColombiaVenezuela relationship, profits from the Guajira mines were to be shared. As these strong economic ties were forged, military co- operation and exchange further lessened tensions. It had allowed the Colombian military to concentrate on combating internal guerillas while Venezuela would be spared the expense of a costly arms race. The price for Colombian generosity came with potential strings attached. Under terms of the 1947 Rio Pact, South American nations were obligated to come to the aid of fellow co-signers should they be attacked. Colombian military officials had every intention of requesting assistance from their Venezuela counterparts should the U.S. decide to intervene on Panama's behalf. Colombian officials were particularly interested in Venezuela's three fighter squadrons. Equipped with F-16As, Mirages, and F-5s, the 11th, 12th, 16th Interceptor/attack Squadrons would be necessary to deal with 1 67 the potential U.S. carrier and land based air threat. OV-10s belonging to the 15th Special Operations Group based at Maracaibo would be indispensable for jungle operations. With the eastern flank secure now that Venezuela was tentatively on board, Colombia now turned its attention to enlisting additional conspirators. Since waving a carrot in the form of Guajira coal had worked so well with Venezuela, the military decided to take the same approach with others in the region. A high level Colombian delegation was hurriedly sent to Managua, Nicaragua's lakeside capital. In secret meetings with Sandinista military and governmental civilian leaders, the emissaries placed two specific proposals on the table. First,Colombia promised not to oppose Nicaragua's plan to construct a second trans-oceanic canal in the future. To Colombia, this was a major concession since most future business would be directed to a wider and more modern canal system. Secondly, Colombia agreed to enter into talks concerning the islands of San Andres and Providencia off Nicaragua's eastern shore. In 1979, these two islands were the subject of a territorial dispute which intensified when Nicaragua reasserted its claims. Fearing a possible Sandinista effort to take the islands by force, Colombia constructed a major military base on San Andres. This facility, complete with airstrip, served as the naval headquarters for the Caribbean. Increased naval and air patrols near the island was meant to send a message to the Sandinistas; hands off. The cost for future negotiations concerning island repatriation was cooperation in harassing any United States response to the Panamanian operation. Anticipating that the U.S. might try to stage land-based aircraft in Costa Rica, the Colombians wanted to pre-position their aircraft at Nicaragua's Bluefields airbase. From Bluefields, interceptor/attack squadrons were in easy striking distance of Costa Rica and would be astride U .S. sea lanes of communication (SLOC). A BELATED RESPONSE As columns of tanks snaked their way along the InterAmerican highway to Panama City, the Colombian ambassador was summoned to the State Department. Behind closed doors, he was subjected to a verbal harangue from the President and his advisors. The ambassador was unable to shed any light on his government's actions and said nothing. In very undiplomatic terms, the U.S. president stated his administration's position and spelt out the repercussions if Colombia did not withdraw immediately. The Colombian ambassador replied that before he could speak with authority he would first need to consult with members of his own government. He expressed his surprise at the level of American concern since his country was in effect ending Panama's civil war. Furthermore, Colombian troops stationed in Panama were likely to accomplish more in the war on drugs than had all the previous American administrations combined. By skillfully putting the best face on the situation, he had bought his country some additional time. At about the same time the ambassador was being shown the door in Washington, the lead Colombian tanks were rolling bumper to bumper across the Bridge of the Americas. Scout jeeps fanned out to patrol Panama City's side streets while the main column of tanks proceeded down the Avenue of the Martyrs. Unknowingly, the Colombian military had triggered a military response from the U.S. when they entered Panama City. The Bridge of the Americas west of Panama City had been designated as the tripwire. Once the Colombians crossed into the Canal Zone, the United States was locked into a unilateral military response. CRISIS IN CENTRAL AMERICA The initial reaction in any crisis management session is always, "Where are the carrier bttlegroups?" In this instance only one of the 3rd Fleet's carriers was on station in the Caribbean. The Nimitz class USS United States was conducting tactical exercises off Puerto Rico when the invasion first took place. One additional carrier, the USS Carl Vinson, was off Long Island, New York. The two carriers plus their escorts were immediately ordered to rendezvous off Mexico's Yucatan peninsula before proceeding to Panama. In the meantime, F-15E squadrons from Seymour-Johnson, North Carolina were put on alert. These aircraft were to undertake a major shuttle operation to Juan Santamaria International Airport outside of San Jose, Costa Rica. Staged from Costa Rica, F-15Es would be in striking distance of all of Panama and most of Colombia with only a single refueling. 1 68 With Colombian troops spilling into the Canal Zone, airstrikes were probably a foregone conclusion. The two carrier groups and their component aircraft would buy the U.S. some needed time to deploy additional land forces. It would be at least several days before the 82nd Airborne Division could be assembled. Undergoing desert training exercises near the southern tip of the Sinai peninsula, the 82nd would have to be refitted for a jungle environment. The F-15Es in Costa Rica and the carrier-borne F/A-18 Hornets would have to bear the brunt of the initial action. The first task confronting them would be to establish air superiority over the Canal Zone before amphibious and airborne operations could commence. The television media in the U.S. was quick to pick up a story out of the Pentagon concerning a bit of historical irony. The Nimitz class carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt happened to be in Norfolk repairing a minor problem with turbine vibration. The military had originally wanted it to join the USS United States instead of the Vinson. Located in Virginia it would have arrived in the area almost a day sooner. As the orders were being cut, a junior naval attache pointed out that Teddy Roosevelt had perhaps been the root cause of this crisis over a century ago. The orders were changed. _ CENTRAL AMERICA COMMENTARY _ Despite our best intentions, the United States has never been able to maintain a stable relationship with our southern neighbors. Tension has always existed between Latin America and the United States since this country's founding. It has been hard to get beyond accusations of exploitation, since the 19th century is rife with examples of American imperialism. Even sincere and legitimate concerns over the region are often dismissed as either "Yanqui interference" or "Big Brother-ism" by South American nations. The controversy over acquiring the Panama canal is just one case which illustrates why there continues to be such a deep-seated suspicion of the United States. We are living with the legacy of "gunboat diplomacy." Having been pushed around as mere "banana republics" for so long, it only stands to reason that these nations might wish to band together against outsiders. In this scenario the United States finds itself in a dilemma. It is trying to preserve Panamanian independence without becoming mired in another guerrilla war. After some diplomatic arm twisting, Costa Rica has graciously agreed to allow U.S. aircraft to stage missions from its territory. The majority of F-15E missions will undoubtedly take place over Panama and northwestern Colombia. But watch out; rumor has it that Venezuela has joined forces with the Colombians. If true, we may wind up facing some of our own advanced equipment. The Venezuelan Air Force is known to possess F-16s. While the Venezuelan Falcons lack some of the moder navionics that are standard in our domestic models, they are still formidable dogfighters. Nicaragua may become another possible participant in this conflict. Although our State Department is working overtime to convince Managua to stay neutral, no one knows how they will react. American airpower based right next door in Costa Rica may serve as a warning but it might also act like waving a red flag in front of a bull. The Nicaraguans may submit or they may charge in a reflex action. The Panamanian Air Force was equipped with F-5s but it is unknown how many of these aircraft survived the civil war. It is also not known whether these aircraft, if they did survive, are supporting the Colombians or combating them. Determining the threat posed by the F-5s may come down to a case by case situation. While judging South American intentions has always been difficult for our intelligence services, the military aspect of the campaign is relatively cut and dry. The Air Force has assigned F-15Es to strike a wide range of potential targets. From hidden jungle laboratories belonging to the drug cartel barons to communications centers in Bogota, hundreds of targets are about to be caught in a hail of "smart" bombs. COLOMBIAN AND VENEZUELAN ORDER OF BATTLE GROUND FORCES: Colombia: (4) divisions w/ nine brigades, (9) Mechanized-Cavalry Groups, (2) marine battalions, (1) marine jungle battalion, (1) Jungle battalion, (1) Ranger battalion. (1) AAA battalion 169 Venezuela: (3) Infantry divisions, (1) Mechanized-Cavalry Division, (1) Armor division, (1) Jungle division, combat engineers and Ranger Battalion Major Equipment: Colombia: (30) M4A3 Shermans, (30) M3A1 Stuarts, (120) EE-9, (80) EE- 11, (60) M3 halftracks Venezuela: (90) AMX-30, (49) AMX-13, (100) EE-9, (80) V-100s AIR FORCE: Colombia: (2) Interceptor/Attack squadrons, (2) COIN squadrons, (1) Helicopter Transport squadron Venezuela: (3) Interceptor/Attack groups, (2) Special Operation groups, (2) Light Bomber groups Major Equipment: Colombia: (25) Kfirs, (45) Mirage lll & 5s, (18) A-37s, (25) SA-315A, (24) UH-1, (25) MD500, (10) UH-60s Venezuela: (21) Mirage Ills & 5s, (20) F-5s, (25) F-16As, (15) OV-10s NAVAL FORCES: Colombia: (4) Type FS 1500 Frigates, (2) Type 209 Submarines, assorted gunboats and patrol craft Venezuela: (6) Lupo class Frigates, (2) Coast Guard Frigates, (2) Type 209 Submarines, (6) Vosper FACs, (4) Cormoran FACs, (4) LSTs, assorted gunboats and patrol craft AIR DEFENSES: Colombia: small caliber triple-A guns only, recent discount purchases of Soviet equipment possible Venezuela: small caliber triple-A guns, Roland-1, recent discount purchases of Soviet equipment possible END OF MANUAL