TF01 3,Generations - Movie Review 4, Rory Johnston --------------- This has got to be the best Star Trek movie so far, and I loved it. Yes, it isn't like your average Next Generation episode, but then I doubt that would be appropriate for the cinema. As I'm sure other reviewers will say, "It can only get better", and on this I agree. I'm sure the next movie will be even better, but I think this is a hard act to follow. Generations is undeniably a 'passing the torch' movie, and so it's format must change and adapt to include elements of Classic Trek. I think a purely Next Gen movie will have all the more thought provoking storylines and subplots, but that's all still to come. Anyway, who can resist one last heroic adventure for Captain Kirk? And yes, "It was fun." Star Trek has always been about exploring the human condition. What does it mean to be human? Surely the most important thing about humanity is our mortality. We all have to die some time, and Generations explores this. Picard faces up to the death of his brother, and Rene who he considered almost his own son. The death the of Picard family line, and of course, the death of Kirk. I think it says something when a living legend like James Kirk, despite all the heroics he has been through and all the status he has, dies just like anyone else. Easily the best line in the film was: "Oh... shit." True, it may irrevocably change one of the Next Generation's best loved characters, but then I always thought that Data would eventually get his emotions and become more human. He had to get them eventually, and this seems as good a time as any. Now we've a couple more movies to follow Data's newest stretch on his quest to become more human, and for Geordi relive seven years worth of his bad jokes. Data has always been a way to explore the human condition, as he sees everything so honestly, as if through the eyes of a child. Emotions are very human things, and Data has never been able to examine them, other than to yearn for them and comment on their complexity. My only fear is that Data may now become solely a comic relief character, but surely the addition of emotions makes his character far more diverse than it had ever been previously. After all, how many TV shows and movies have had boring, emotionless andriods? To use a terribly over- worked cliche, he has gone were no android has gone before. Yes, the special effects were great, but extolling their virtues does beg the question: what about the rest of the movie? On the whole, I don't think Generations suffered from the wealth of effects. If Paramount were planning on making this a big selling point, they're in for a shock: come video release time, the effects won't be half as impressive on the small screen. I must complement Brannon Braga and Ron Moore on a job well done (in a small effect to offset the inevitable scathing criticisms from others). I though the story held together very well. Malcolm McDowell is easily the best Star Trek villain ever, but I had to feel sorry for him at times, as it was not his fault that he became so fanatical. Picard's grief over Rene and Robert and continuing the family line tied in well with the Nexus and allowed Soran to influence Picard with his 'listening': "Time is the fire in which we burn." Lursa and B'Etor were good as ever, although there wasn't much need to kill them. Data's reaction, "Yes!", was understandable as he was coming to terms with his emotions, and I guess relief and satisfaction were new ones for him. Note that as far as we known, Geordi is still transmitting everything he sees; I sincerely hope this doesn't play a part in any further movies. Was destroying the Enterprise necessary? Whatever the arguments about storylines needing it and any ulterior motives behind having a new Enterprise in further movies, it still makes a damn good scene. Without the Enterprise in such disarray, Kirk would have been beamed up and saved... Worf could have shot down the rocket... and so on. Suffice to say that it would have been a completely different movie. One of the major themes of the movie is that the Enterprise survives through the generations. We see the sailing ship Enterprise, the crew from the Enterprise-A, the Enterprise-B, and then the Enterprise-D. The underlying message here is that there will be another Enterprise, better than the one before. I'm sure a lot of people would have preferred a different movie, well, you're just going to have to live with it. It seems Generations has created quite a divide. Some love it, others loathe it. A mark out of 100? Well rather than tediously break this down into special effects, plot, suspense and whatever, I will just pluck a percentage out of the air. What would be reasonable... 99%. Yes, I'm sure there are several people having wild fits right about now, but calm down, I will justify this with one remark: I'm saving the 100% for the next movie. Mark Platts ------------- I watched the film on the first day of its general release (no previews for me I'm afraid) in a small cinema in Sheffield, packed to the brim with young students. The atmosphere was optimstic and light. I have to say I really enjoyed Generations (although I seem to be in the minority here - perhaps it's because I'm not a fanatic). As I'm an artist, any film that is visually exciting and action packed gets my vote!! This film included numerous 'beauty shots' of the various ships and were beautifully done, namely the Enterprise B (thanks for changing it from the original Excelsior model so I have to make ANOTHER one guys!!) and the Nebula class ship at the end of the movie. It seems the director payed a lot of attention to the visual aspect alot. Superb special effects such as the star 'dying' (time to get Lightwave running to try that one out for myself!!) and the hole in the Enterprise B were much appreciated, but few and far between for my liking. Oe thing I did notice was very little movie time was allocated to each character. TNG has a lot of characters - I'm disappointed to see little expansion of their personalities in the movie (while Trek fans know most characters in depth, the casual movie goer needed a little more time to get to know them), the obvious exceptions being Data. While I laughed at his jokes (which went down very well in my cinema), his newly found emotions were just fear and humour - where were the others? Anger seemed to do well in "Descent" (I would have loved him to have made a pass a Troi!!) - he just seemed to be the funny man. I would liked to have seen more of Marina Sirtis (but that's only because she's the most perfect woman in both this universe and the Trek one!!!) but I got the feeling that she has borrowed Bev Crusher's wig somewhere along the line. Whose idea was that? Stick to the black hair, love! I really disliked the part when Picard/Kirk were in the Nexus - the scene could have been shortened, and the time saved could have been used developing the other characters more. I nearly burst out laughing when I saw the ridiculously inept saucer crash (Simon put it best when he said it looked like a scene from Thunderbirds - no disrespect to Gerry Anderson, as he could have done a hundred times better on a smaller budget. Gerry is GOD). I liked McDowell as Soran. Wonderfully OTT but a joy to behold (it would have been interesting to see him in a clinch with B'etor!!). When I came out of the cinema, I felt good. It was a good, enjoyable movie - a bit sad to see old Kirk hang up his toupe, but there you go - the end must come. The general consensus seems to be that the movie could have been so much more - and I agree. Can the next film have the Borg in, Mr Director??! But it comes in a close second in my fave Trek films to "The Wrath Of Khan" and I will snap up the video when it gets released. 90% for a Trek film, 70% for a film in general. Marcus Priddey ---------------- I won't bother boring you with a plot synopsis as you've all seen the movie, and those that haven't... tough. Suffice it to say this is the latest of the Trek movies combining some of the Classic Trek cast with the Next Generation cast. Now this movie, for one reason or another has had a lot of flak and undue criticism which I feel it doesn't deserve. Yes, the film has some holes in it but show me a film that doesn't. Yes, the film has some continuity errors in it, but that is going to happen when you move a series from the small screen and turn it into a big screen adventure that has to appeal not only to Trek fandom, but also to a much wider movie going audience. To try and explain why I liked it, I will have to raise the criticisms made. First, apparently, according to Gene Roddenberry's guidelines for Trek, none of the regular characters should be killed, so Kirk should not have died. Oh, really?! Why's that then? Is he, and the rest of them immortal or something? I don't like Kirk (I don't particularly like Shatner, either for that matter) and I have never liked Classic Trek. I HAVE watched all the Classic Trek episodes, just to see if there was one I liked and I didn't rate any of them higher than tolerable. So it was no great loss to me when he died (which, as you all know caused all the hoo-har about continuity). People die. That is the one guarantee in life, and you are not going to venture into something as big as space without casualties and why should any of the series characters be treated any different. Second, why was Harriman (Captain of 1701-B) so useless and what was he doing in charge of the flagship of Starfleet's erm, fleet? Right then. Hands up those of you that have been in a position of authority where there is no one to run to if anything goes wrong and no one to fall back on. Remember that feeling when you were told "There's your post. Now go do your job." It felt like you'd swallowed a lead ball, your heart was going into overdrive and your brain was a blank slate. Yes, you say, but any captain has had to go through command training and also the position of first/executive officer. Okay then, command training is just that - training. It is no substitute for experience, and I would refer you to the book, when Kirk first took command of his Enterprise. He alienated virtually the entire crew on his first mission. And as for the post of first officer, well you still have the captain to rely on if something goes wrong. Next, where were all the lights? Lighting is a key role in the setting of the atmosphere of a film. "Generations" was not a laugh a minute comedy film, but a semi-serious sci-fi yarn. Let's put it like this, Picard's brother and nephew have been burnt to death, an observatory was attacked with some few people killed, the Enterprise went into battle with a Klingon ship, which blew up killing all on board and a "legend" died at the end. Hell yeah, let's have lots of lovely light everywhere 'cause we're all a jolly bunch! Light sets the atmosphere which in turn gets the audience responsive to the film. I'm sure these same people shouting "LIGHT!" were also shouting "COLOUR!" during "Schindler's List" and "The Elephant Man". Would either of those two films been as effective if they were in colour? No, I think not. And neither would "Generations" if it had been lit up like a Christmas tree. Finally, Data should not have had the emotion chip fitted and most certainly should not have swore. Why not? Data is an android who wishes to become human. To understand the human condition you need to experience it, and emotions are part of our existance. If he felt he had reached an impasse in his learning of our behaviour then having the emotion chip fitted was the next logical step. He said he couldn't grasp such a simple concept of humour. Can you? I know I can't. Oh, we all know how to tell jokes and understand humour, but what makes one person find something funny but another find annoying. Can you define humour? The dictionary describes humour as the faculty of saying or perceiving what excites amusement. Anyone can understand the definition, but can you descibe what it actually feels like? As for saying "Oh, shit" when the Enterprise's saucer section was going to hit the planet's surface, what would you say if you were staring the Grim Reaper in the face? Besides, I thought it was quite funny myself, which is exactly the reason why the scriptwriters put it in there. These reasons are why I enjoyed Generation's and why I'm going to give it 80/100.